Cone Beam Computed Tomography Panoramic Mandibular Indices in the Screening of Postmenopausal Women with Low Bone Mass: Correlations with Bone Quantity and Quality.

IF 2.5 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Ioana Ruxandra Poiană, Iulia Florentina Burcea, Silviu-Mirel Pițuru, Alexandru Bucur
{"title":"Cone Beam Computed Tomography Panoramic Mandibular Indices in the Screening of Postmenopausal Women with Low Bone Mass: Correlations with Bone Quantity and Quality.","authors":"Ioana Ruxandra Poiană, Iulia Florentina Burcea, Silviu-Mirel Pițuru, Alexandru Bucur","doi":"10.3390/dj12080256","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study examined the potential use of computed tomography panoramic mandibular indices on cone beam CT (CBCT) for assessing bone density in postmenopausal women with low bone mass.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>The study enrolled 104 postmenopausal women who underwent dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) using a DXA scanner and mental foramen region CBCT alongside the NewTom VGi EVO Cone Beam 3D system. We assessed the relationship between the following DXA parameters: lumbar, femoral neck, and total hip T score, bone mineral density (BMD), and lumbar trabecular bone score (TBS). The following panoramic mandibular indices were also considered: the computed tomography mandibular index superior (CTI(S)), computed tomography mandibular index inferior (CTI(I)), and computed tomography mental index (CTMI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study revealed moderate correlations between CBCT indices and BMD/TBS scores: CTMI showed the highest correlation with the femoral neck T-score (r = 0.551, <i>p</i> < 0.0001). TBS scores were also moderately correlated with CBCT indices: CTMI showed a moderate positive correlation with TBS (r = 0.431, <i>p</i> < 0.0001); CTI(S) had a similar moderate positive correlation with TBS (r = 0.421, <i>p</i> < 0.0001). AUC values ranged from 0.697 to 0.733 for osteoporosis versus the osteopenia/normal group and from 0.734 to 0.744 for low versus normal bone quality groups, <i>p</i> < 0.0001. The comparison of the values of the studied indices between low versus normal bone quality (quantified with TBS) groups showed high sensitivity but low specificity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CBCT-measured indices CTI(S), CTI(I), and CTMI are useful in assessing patients with low bone mass to improve, by specific treatment, the prognosis of dental implants.</p>","PeriodicalId":11269,"journal":{"name":"Dentistry Journal","volume":"12 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11353085/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dentistry Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/dj12080256","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study examined the potential use of computed tomography panoramic mandibular indices on cone beam CT (CBCT) for assessing bone density in postmenopausal women with low bone mass.

Study design: The study enrolled 104 postmenopausal women who underwent dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) using a DXA scanner and mental foramen region CBCT alongside the NewTom VGi EVO Cone Beam 3D system. We assessed the relationship between the following DXA parameters: lumbar, femoral neck, and total hip T score, bone mineral density (BMD), and lumbar trabecular bone score (TBS). The following panoramic mandibular indices were also considered: the computed tomography mandibular index superior (CTI(S)), computed tomography mandibular index inferior (CTI(I)), and computed tomography mental index (CTMI).

Results: The study revealed moderate correlations between CBCT indices and BMD/TBS scores: CTMI showed the highest correlation with the femoral neck T-score (r = 0.551, p < 0.0001). TBS scores were also moderately correlated with CBCT indices: CTMI showed a moderate positive correlation with TBS (r = 0.431, p < 0.0001); CTI(S) had a similar moderate positive correlation with TBS (r = 0.421, p < 0.0001). AUC values ranged from 0.697 to 0.733 for osteoporosis versus the osteopenia/normal group and from 0.734 to 0.744 for low versus normal bone quality groups, p < 0.0001. The comparison of the values of the studied indices between low versus normal bone quality (quantified with TBS) groups showed high sensitivity but low specificity.

Conclusions: CBCT-measured indices CTI(S), CTI(I), and CTMI are useful in assessing patients with low bone mass to improve, by specific treatment, the prognosis of dental implants.

锥形束计算机断层扫描全景下颌骨指数在绝经后低骨量妇女筛查中的应用:与骨量和骨质的相关性。
研究目的本研究探讨了锥形束CT(CBCT)上的计算机断层扫描下颌骨全景指数在评估绝经后低骨量妇女骨密度中的潜在用途:该研究招募了104名绝经后妇女,她们使用DXA扫描仪和NewTom VGi EVO锥形束3D系统进行了双能X射线吸收测定(DXA)和精神孔区域CBCT检查。我们评估了以下 DXA 参数之间的关系:腰椎、股骨颈和全髋 T 评分、骨矿密度 (BMD) 和腰椎骨小梁评分 (TBS)。同时还考虑了以下下颌骨全景指数:计算机断层扫描下颌骨指数上(CTI(S))、计算机断层扫描下颌骨指数下(CTI(I))和计算机断层扫描心理指数(CTMI):研究显示,计算机断层扫描指数与 BMD/TBS 评分之间存在中度相关性:CTMI 与股骨颈 T 评分的相关性最高(r = 0.551,p < 0.0001)。TBS 评分与 CBCT 指数也呈中度相关:CTMI 与 TBS 呈中度正相关(r = 0.431,p < 0.0001);CTI(S) 与 TBS 呈类似的中度正相关(r = 0.421,p < 0.0001)。骨质疏松症组与骨质疏松症/正常组的 AUC 值从 0.697 到 0.733 不等,低骨质量组与正常骨质量组的 AUC 值从 0.734 到 0.744 不等,p < 0.0001。对低骨质组和正常骨质组(用 TBS 定量)的研究指数值进行比较,结果显示灵敏度高,但特异性低:结论:CBCT 测量的 CTI(S)、CTI(I) 和 CTMI 指数可用于评估低骨量患者,通过特定治疗改善牙科植入物的预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Dentistry Journal
Dentistry Journal Dentistry-Dentistry (all)
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
213
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信