Comparison of Upper Central Incisor Torque in the ClinCheck® with and without CBCT Integration: A Cross-Sectional Study.

IF 2.5 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Cíntia Queirós, Maria Gonçalves, Sofia Ferreira, Inês de Castro, Rui M S Azevedo, Teresa Pinho
{"title":"Comparison of Upper Central Incisor Torque in the ClinCheck<sup>®</sup> with and without CBCT Integration: A Cross-Sectional Study.","authors":"Cíntia Queirós, Maria Gonçalves, Sofia Ferreira, Inês de Castro, Rui M S Azevedo, Teresa Pinho","doi":"10.3390/dj12080269","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Controlling root movement is one of the greatest challenges in orthodontic treatment with aligners, like Invisalign<sup>®</sup> aligners. Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) integration into ClinCheck<sup>®</sup>, enabling bone and root visualisation, allows a more accurate follow-up of the teeth position. This study aims to compare torque measurements of the upper central incisors with and without CBCT and relate them to the upper incisor inclination and facial biotype. In a sample of 70 teeth, torque measurements were obtained by importing images into AutoCAD<sup>®</sup> software (version 2024). The angle between the tooth's long axis with CBCT duplicate and the tooth's long axis without CBCT was obtained to assess the difference. Statistically significant differences between torque measurements with and without CBCT were found, as well as between these measurements and the inclination of the upper incisors. No statistically significant differences were found among the facial biotypes. The average values of 27.8° ± 3.4° and 21.5° ± 3.2° were obtained for the angle between the axes. Torque without CBCT was lower than torque with CBCT, for the same tooth. The angle between the axes had a similar mean for both teeth. CBCT integration into ClinCheck<sup>®</sup> allows for a more correct torque measurement.</p>","PeriodicalId":11269,"journal":{"name":"Dentistry Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11353991/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dentistry Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/dj12080269","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Controlling root movement is one of the greatest challenges in orthodontic treatment with aligners, like Invisalign® aligners. Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) integration into ClinCheck®, enabling bone and root visualisation, allows a more accurate follow-up of the teeth position. This study aims to compare torque measurements of the upper central incisors with and without CBCT and relate them to the upper incisor inclination and facial biotype. In a sample of 70 teeth, torque measurements were obtained by importing images into AutoCAD® software (version 2024). The angle between the tooth's long axis with CBCT duplicate and the tooth's long axis without CBCT was obtained to assess the difference. Statistically significant differences between torque measurements with and without CBCT were found, as well as between these measurements and the inclination of the upper incisors. No statistically significant differences were found among the facial biotypes. The average values of 27.8° ± 3.4° and 21.5° ± 3.2° were obtained for the angle between the axes. Torque without CBCT was lower than torque with CBCT, for the same tooth. The angle between the axes had a similar mean for both teeth. CBCT integration into ClinCheck® allows for a more correct torque measurement.

ClinCheck® 上中切牙扭力与未整合 CBCT 的比较:横断面研究
在使用隐适美®矫正器等矫正器进行正畸治疗时,控制牙根移动是最大的挑战之一。将锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)集成到 ClinCheck® 中,可实现牙槽骨和牙根的可视化,从而更准确地跟踪牙齿位置。本研究旨在比较使用和未使用 CBCT 时上中切牙的扭矩测量值,并将其与上切牙倾斜度和面部生物类型联系起来。在 70 颗牙齿的样本中,通过将图像导入 AutoCAD® 软件(2024 版)获得了扭矩测量值。复制了 CBCT 的牙齿长轴与未复制 CBCT 的牙齿长轴之间的角度被用来评估差异。发现使用 CBCT 和未使用 CBCT 时的扭矩测量值之间以及这些测量值与上切牙倾斜度之间存在明显的统计学差异。面部生物类型之间没有发现明显的统计学差异。轴间角的平均值分别为 27.8° ± 3.4° 和 21.5° ± 3.2°。对于相同的牙齿,不使用 CBCT 的扭矩低于使用 CBCT 的扭矩。两颗牙齿的轴间角平均值相似。将 CBCT 集成到 ClinCheck® 中可以更正确地测量扭矩。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Dentistry Journal
Dentistry Journal Dentistry-Dentistry (all)
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
213
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信