Appropriateness of Imaging for Low-Risk Prostate Cancer-Real World Data from the Pennsylvania Urologic Regional Collaboration (PURC).

IF 2.8 4区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Raidizon Mercedes, Dennis Head, Elizabeth Zook, Eric Eidelman, Jeffrey Tomaszewski, Serge Ginzburg, Robert Uzzo, Marc Smaldone, John Danella, Thomas J Guzzo, Daniel Lee, Laurence Belkoff, Jeffrey Walker, Adam Reese, Mihir S Shah, Bruce Jacobs, Jay D Raman
{"title":"Appropriateness of Imaging for Low-Risk Prostate Cancer-Real World Data from the Pennsylvania Urologic Regional Collaboration (PURC).","authors":"Raidizon Mercedes, Dennis Head, Elizabeth Zook, Eric Eidelman, Jeffrey Tomaszewski, Serge Ginzburg, Robert Uzzo, Marc Smaldone, John Danella, Thomas J Guzzo, Daniel Lee, Laurence Belkoff, Jeffrey Walker, Adam Reese, Mihir S Shah, Bruce Jacobs, Jay D Raman","doi":"10.3390/curroncol31080354","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Imaging for prostate cancer defines the extent of disease. Guidelines recommend against imaging low-risk prostate cancer patients with a computed tomography (CT) scan or bone scan due to the low probability of metastasis. We reviewed imaging performed for men diagnosed with low-risk prostate cancer across the Pennsylvania Urologic Regional Collaborative (PURC), a physician-led data sharing and quality improvement collaborative. The data of 10 practices were queried regarding the imaging performed in men diagnosed with prostate cancer from 2015 to 2022. The cohort included 13,122 patients with 3502 (27%) low-risk, 2364 (18%) favorable intermediate-risk, 3585 (27%) unfavorable intermediate-risk, and 3671 (28%) high-risk prostate cancer, based on the AUA guidelines. Amongst the low-risk patients, imaging utilization included pelvic MRI (59.7%), bone scan (17.8%), CT (16.0%), and PET-based imaging (0.5%). Redundant imaging occurred in 1022 patients (29.2%). There was variability among the PURC sites for imaging used in the low-risk patients, and iterative education reduced the need for CT and bone scans. Approximately 15% of low-risk patients had staging imaging performed using either a CT or bone scan, and redundant imaging occurred in almost one-third of men. Such data underscore the need for continued guideline-based education to optimize the stewardship of resources and reduce unnecessary costs to the healthcare system.</p>","PeriodicalId":11012,"journal":{"name":"Current oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11352630/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol31080354","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Imaging for prostate cancer defines the extent of disease. Guidelines recommend against imaging low-risk prostate cancer patients with a computed tomography (CT) scan or bone scan due to the low probability of metastasis. We reviewed imaging performed for men diagnosed with low-risk prostate cancer across the Pennsylvania Urologic Regional Collaborative (PURC), a physician-led data sharing and quality improvement collaborative. The data of 10 practices were queried regarding the imaging performed in men diagnosed with prostate cancer from 2015 to 2022. The cohort included 13,122 patients with 3502 (27%) low-risk, 2364 (18%) favorable intermediate-risk, 3585 (27%) unfavorable intermediate-risk, and 3671 (28%) high-risk prostate cancer, based on the AUA guidelines. Amongst the low-risk patients, imaging utilization included pelvic MRI (59.7%), bone scan (17.8%), CT (16.0%), and PET-based imaging (0.5%). Redundant imaging occurred in 1022 patients (29.2%). There was variability among the PURC sites for imaging used in the low-risk patients, and iterative education reduced the need for CT and bone scans. Approximately 15% of low-risk patients had staging imaging performed using either a CT or bone scan, and redundant imaging occurred in almost one-third of men. Such data underscore the need for continued guideline-based education to optimize the stewardship of resources and reduce unnecessary costs to the healthcare system.

低风险前列腺癌成像的适宜性--来自宾夕法尼亚州泌尿外科区域协作组织 (PURC) 的真实世界数据。
前列腺癌的成像检查可确定疾病的范围。由于低风险前列腺癌患者发生转移的可能性较低,指南建议不对其进行计算机断层扫描 (CT) 或骨扫描成像。我们审查了宾夕法尼亚州泌尿外科区域协作组织 (PURC) 为诊断为低风险前列腺癌的男性患者所做的成像检查,这是一个由医生主导的数据共享和质量改进协作组织。我们查询了 10 家医疗机构在 2015 年至 2022 年期间为确诊为前列腺癌的男性患者所做的影像学检查数据。该队列包括13122名患者,根据AUA指南,其中3502人(27%)为低风险前列腺癌,2364人(18%)为有利的中风险前列腺癌,3585人(27%)为不利的中风险前列腺癌,3671人(28%)为高风险前列腺癌。在低危患者中,使用成像技术的患者包括骨盆核磁共振成像(59.7%)、骨扫描(17.8%)、CT(16.0%)和基于 PET 的成像(0.5%)。有 1022 名患者(29.2%)使用了冗余成像。各 PURC 站点对低风险患者使用的成像存在差异,反复教育减少了对 CT 和骨扫描的需求。约 15% 的低风险患者使用 CT 或骨扫描进行了分期成像,近三分之一的男性患者进行了多余的成像。这些数据强调了继续开展基于指南的教育的必要性,以优化资源的管理并减少医疗系统不必要的成本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current oncology
Current oncology ONCOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
664
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Current Oncology is a peer-reviewed, Canadian-based and internationally respected journal. Current Oncology represents a multidisciplinary medium encompassing health care workers in the field of cancer therapy in Canada to report upon and to review progress in the management of this disease. We encourage submissions from all fields of cancer medicine, including radiation oncology, surgical oncology, medical oncology, pediatric oncology, pathology, and cancer rehabilitation and survivorship. Articles published in the journal typically contain information that is relevant directly to clinical oncology practice, and have clear potential for application to the current or future practice of cancer medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信