Developing a validated methodology for identifying clozapine treatment periods in electronic health records.

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Aviv Segev, Risha Govind, Ebenezer Oloyede, Hamilton Morrin, Amelia Jewell, Rowena Jones, Laura Mangiaterra, Stefano Bonora, Ehtesham Iqbal, Robert Stewart, Matthew Broadbent, James H MacCabe
{"title":"Developing a validated methodology for identifying clozapine treatment periods in electronic health records.","authors":"Aviv Segev, Risha Govind, Ebenezer Oloyede, Hamilton Morrin, Amelia Jewell, Rowena Jones, Laura Mangiaterra, Stefano Bonora, Ehtesham Iqbal, Robert Stewart, Matthew Broadbent, James H MacCabe","doi":"10.1186/s12888-024-06022-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Clozapine is the only recommended antipsychotic medication for individuals diagnosed with treatment-resistant schizophrenia. Unfortunately, its wider use is hindered by several possible adverse effects, some of which are rare but potentially life threatening. As such, there is a growing interest in studying clozapine use and safety in routinely collected healthcare data. However, previous attempts to characterise clozapine treatment have had low accuracy.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To develop a methodology for identifying clozapine treatment dates by combining several data sources and implement this on a large clinical database.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Non-identifiable electronic health records from a large mental health provider in London and a linked database from a national clozapine blood monitoring service were used to obtain information regarding patients' clozapine treatment status, blood tests and pharmacy dispensing records. A rule-based algorithm was developed to determine the dates of starting and stopping treatment based on these data, and more than 10% of the outcomes were validated by manual review of de-identified case note text.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 3,212 possible clozapine treatment periods were identified, of which 425 (13.2%) were excluded due to insufficient data to verify clozapine administration. Of the 2,787 treatments remaining, 1,902 (68.2%) had an identified start-date. On evaluation, the algorithm identified treatments with 96.4% accuracy; start dates were 96.2% accurate within 15 days, and end dates were 85.1% accurate within 30 days.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The algorithm produced a reliable database of clozapine treatment periods. Beyond underpinning future observational clozapine studies, we envisage it will facilitate similar implementations on additional large clinical databases worldwide.</p>","PeriodicalId":9029,"journal":{"name":"BMC Psychiatry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11351314/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-024-06022-5","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Clozapine is the only recommended antipsychotic medication for individuals diagnosed with treatment-resistant schizophrenia. Unfortunately, its wider use is hindered by several possible adverse effects, some of which are rare but potentially life threatening. As such, there is a growing interest in studying clozapine use and safety in routinely collected healthcare data. However, previous attempts to characterise clozapine treatment have had low accuracy.

Aim: To develop a methodology for identifying clozapine treatment dates by combining several data sources and implement this on a large clinical database.

Methods: Non-identifiable electronic health records from a large mental health provider in London and a linked database from a national clozapine blood monitoring service were used to obtain information regarding patients' clozapine treatment status, blood tests and pharmacy dispensing records. A rule-based algorithm was developed to determine the dates of starting and stopping treatment based on these data, and more than 10% of the outcomes were validated by manual review of de-identified case note text.

Results: A total of 3,212 possible clozapine treatment periods were identified, of which 425 (13.2%) were excluded due to insufficient data to verify clozapine administration. Of the 2,787 treatments remaining, 1,902 (68.2%) had an identified start-date. On evaluation, the algorithm identified treatments with 96.4% accuracy; start dates were 96.2% accurate within 15 days, and end dates were 85.1% accurate within 30 days.

Conclusions: The algorithm produced a reliable database of clozapine treatment periods. Beyond underpinning future observational clozapine studies, we envisage it will facilitate similar implementations on additional large clinical databases worldwide.

开发一种有效的方法,用于识别电子健康记录中的氯氮平治疗期。
背景介绍氯氮平是唯一被推荐用于治疗被诊断为耐药性精神分裂症患者的抗精神病药物。遗憾的是,氯氮平的广泛使用受到了一些可能的不良反应的阻碍,其中一些不良反应虽然罕见,但却有可能危及生命。因此,人们对研究常规医疗数据中氯氮平的使用和安全性越来越感兴趣。然而,以前尝试对氯氮平治疗进行特征描述的准确性较低。目的:通过结合多个数据源,开发一种识别氯氮平治疗日期的方法,并在大型临床数据库中实施:方法:利用伦敦一家大型精神医疗机构的不可识别电子健康记录和全国性氯氮平血液监测服务的链接数据库,获取患者的氯氮平治疗状态、血液检测和药房配药记录等信息。根据这些数据开发了一种基于规则的算法来确定开始和停止治疗的日期,并通过人工审核去身份化的病例记录文本验证了超过10%的结果:结果:共确定了 3,212 个可能的氯氮平治疗期,其中 425 个(13.2%)因氯氮平用药验证数据不足而被排除。在剩余的 2,787 个疗程中,1,902 个疗程(68.2%)有确定的开始日期。经评估,该算法识别治疗的准确率为 96.4%;开始日期在 15 天内的准确率为 96.2%,结束日期在 30 天内的准确率为 85.1%:该算法建立了一个可靠的氯氮平治疗期数据库。除了作为未来氯氮平观察性研究的基础外,我们预计它还将促进全球其他大型临床数据库的类似实施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Psychiatry
BMC Psychiatry 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
4.50%
发文量
716
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Psychiatry is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of psychiatric disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信