Evolving patterns in systemic treatment utilization and survival among older patients with advanced cutaneous melanoma

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Cancer Medicine Pub Date : 2024-08-28 DOI:10.1002/cam4.70131
Yoon Duk Hong, Lindsey Enewold, Elad Sharon, Jeremy L. Warner, Amy J. Davidoff, Chris Zeruto, Angela B. Mariotto
{"title":"Evolving patterns in systemic treatment utilization and survival among older patients with advanced cutaneous melanoma","authors":"Yoon Duk Hong,&nbsp;Lindsey Enewold,&nbsp;Elad Sharon,&nbsp;Jeremy L. Warner,&nbsp;Amy J. Davidoff,&nbsp;Chris Zeruto,&nbsp;Angela B. Mariotto","doi":"10.1002/cam4.70131","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>In the last decade, melanoma treatment has improved significantly. However, data on population-level treatment utilization and survival trends among older patients is limited. This study aimed to analyze trends in systemic anticancer therapy (Rx), including the uptake of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), in conjunction with trends in cause-specific survival among older patients (66+) diagnosed with advanced melanoma (2008–2019).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We used the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare Condensed Resource to assess any Rx utilization among patients first diagnosed with advanced melanoma in 2008–2010, 2011–2014, and 2015–2019, stratified by stage, and type of first-line Rx among patients receiving Rx. The SEER dataset was used to evaluate trends in cause-specific survival by year of diagnosis.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Rx utilization (any type) almost doubled, from 28.6% (2008–2010) to 55.4% (2015–2019) for stage 3 melanoma, and from 35.5% to 68.0% for stage 4 melanoma. In 2008–2010, the standard first-line treatment was cytokines/cytotoxic chemotherapy/other. By 2015–2019, only 5.1% (stage 3) and &lt;3.6% (stage 4) of patients receiving Rx received these agents, as ICIs emerged as the dominant treatment. Both 1-year and 5-year cause-specific survival significantly improved since 2010 for stage 4 and since 2013 for stage 3.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>This study shows a significant rise in Rx utilization and a rapid transition from cytokines/cytotoxic chemotherapy to ICIs, reflecting a rapid uptake of highly effective treatment in a previously challenging disease with limited options before 2011. The documented survival improvement aligns with the adoption of these novel treatments, underscoring their significant impact on real-world patient outcomes.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":139,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cam4.70131","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cam4.70131","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

In the last decade, melanoma treatment has improved significantly. However, data on population-level treatment utilization and survival trends among older patients is limited. This study aimed to analyze trends in systemic anticancer therapy (Rx), including the uptake of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), in conjunction with trends in cause-specific survival among older patients (66+) diagnosed with advanced melanoma (2008–2019).

Methods

We used the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare Condensed Resource to assess any Rx utilization among patients first diagnosed with advanced melanoma in 2008–2010, 2011–2014, and 2015–2019, stratified by stage, and type of first-line Rx among patients receiving Rx. The SEER dataset was used to evaluate trends in cause-specific survival by year of diagnosis.

Results

Rx utilization (any type) almost doubled, from 28.6% (2008–2010) to 55.4% (2015–2019) for stage 3 melanoma, and from 35.5% to 68.0% for stage 4 melanoma. In 2008–2010, the standard first-line treatment was cytokines/cytotoxic chemotherapy/other. By 2015–2019, only 5.1% (stage 3) and <3.6% (stage 4) of patients receiving Rx received these agents, as ICIs emerged as the dominant treatment. Both 1-year and 5-year cause-specific survival significantly improved since 2010 for stage 4 and since 2013 for stage 3.

Conclusions

This study shows a significant rise in Rx utilization and a rapid transition from cytokines/cytotoxic chemotherapy to ICIs, reflecting a rapid uptake of highly effective treatment in a previously challenging disease with limited options before 2011. The documented survival improvement aligns with the adoption of these novel treatments, underscoring their significant impact on real-world patient outcomes.

Abstract Image

晚期皮肤黑色素瘤老年患者系统治疗的使用和存活率的演变模式。
简介在过去十年中,黑色素瘤的治疗有了显著改善。然而,有关老年患者的治疗利用率和生存趋势的数据却很有限。本研究旨在分析全身抗癌治疗(Rx)的趋势,包括免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)的使用情况,以及确诊为晚期黑色素瘤的老年患者(66 岁以上)的病因特异性生存趋势(2008-2019 年):我们利用监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)--医疗保险浓缩资源评估了2008-2010年、2011-2014年和2015-2019年首次确诊的晚期黑色素瘤患者的任何药物使用情况,并按分期和接受药物治疗患者的一线药物类型进行了分层。SEER数据集用于评估按诊断年份划分的病因特异性生存率趋势:3期黑色素瘤的药物使用率(任何类型)几乎翻了一番,从28.6%(2008-2010年)增至55.4%(2015-2019年),4期黑色素瘤的药物使用率从35.5%增至68.0%。2008-2010 年,标准的一线治疗是细胞因子/毒性化疗/其他。到 2015-2019 年,只有 5.1%(3 期)和结论:这项研究显示,药物使用率大幅上升,并从细胞因子/细胞毒化疗迅速过渡到 ICIs,这反映出在 2011 年之前,对于这种以前选择有限、具有挑战性的疾病,高效治疗已被迅速接受。记录的生存率改善与这些新型疗法的采用相吻合,凸显了它们对实际患者治疗效果的重大影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cancer Medicine
Cancer Medicine ONCOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
2.50%
发文量
907
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊介绍: Cancer Medicine is a peer-reviewed, open access, interdisciplinary journal providing rapid publication of research from global biomedical researchers across the cancer sciences. The journal will consider submissions from all oncologic specialties, including, but not limited to, the following areas: Clinical Cancer Research Translational research ∙ clinical trials ∙ chemotherapy ∙ radiation therapy ∙ surgical therapy ∙ clinical observations ∙ clinical guidelines ∙ genetic consultation ∙ ethical considerations Cancer Biology: Molecular biology ∙ cellular biology ∙ molecular genetics ∙ genomics ∙ immunology ∙ epigenetics ∙ metabolic studies ∙ proteomics ∙ cytopathology ∙ carcinogenesis ∙ drug discovery and delivery. Cancer Prevention: Behavioral science ∙ psychosocial studies ∙ screening ∙ nutrition ∙ epidemiology and prevention ∙ community outreach. Bioinformatics: Gene expressions profiles ∙ gene regulation networks ∙ genome bioinformatics ∙ pathwayanalysis ∙ prognostic biomarkers. Cancer Medicine publishes original research articles, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and research methods papers, along with invited editorials and commentaries. Original research papers must report well-conducted research with conclusions supported by the data presented in the paper.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信