“Shock kidney-like Appearance”: Objective evaluation of renal color changes in hemorrhagic shock deaths

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, LEGAL
Shogo Shimbashi , Motoo Yoshimiya , Akiko Tashiro , Sakon Noriki , Hideki Hyodoh
{"title":"“Shock kidney-like Appearance”: Objective evaluation of renal color changes in hemorrhagic shock deaths","authors":"Shogo Shimbashi ,&nbsp;Motoo Yoshimiya ,&nbsp;Akiko Tashiro ,&nbsp;Sakon Noriki ,&nbsp;Hideki Hyodoh","doi":"10.1016/j.legalmed.2024.102521","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Severe bleeding due to various traumatic injuries can cause hemorrhagic shock, which is difficult to diagnose using forensic medicine. Therefore, we defined the difference in color between the renal cortex and medulla observed in hemorrhagic shock deaths as “shock kidney-like appearance (SKLA)” and digitally analyzed the color difference with a digital camera and color analysis software. The aim of this study was to develop and evaluate a method for objectively determining SKLA and improve the accuracy of forensic diagnosis. We examined the kidneys of 122 cases (83 males and 39 females; average age, 64.8 years) autopsied at our facility. Using Image J, we analyzed the color of the cortex and medulla from photographs of bisected kidneys. We defined the color difference between the cortex and medulla in the L*a*b* color space as cortical-medullary color difference and performed a comparative analysis between the hemorrhage and control groups. Significant differences were observed in ΔL* and Δa* values between the two groups (p &lt; 0.05 and p &lt; 0.001, respectively). Analysis of Δa* values showed that the cortex was less reddish than the medulla in the hemorrhage group. The cutoff value for determining SKLA was set at Δa* = −1.33 (sensitivity, 0.79; specificity, 0.81; AUC, 0.859). Traditional evaluations of color rely on subjective assessments, which raise issues of reliability and reproducibility. This study successfully overcame the limitations of subjective evaluation by objectively assessing cortical-medullary color difference in the kidneys. Our results represent an important step towards improving the objectivity of color evaluations.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49913,"journal":{"name":"Legal Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1344622324001317/pdfft?md5=18a4678876178b794d597bea1379b1d3&pid=1-s2.0-S1344622324001317-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Legal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1344622324001317","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, LEGAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Severe bleeding due to various traumatic injuries can cause hemorrhagic shock, which is difficult to diagnose using forensic medicine. Therefore, we defined the difference in color between the renal cortex and medulla observed in hemorrhagic shock deaths as “shock kidney-like appearance (SKLA)” and digitally analyzed the color difference with a digital camera and color analysis software. The aim of this study was to develop and evaluate a method for objectively determining SKLA and improve the accuracy of forensic diagnosis. We examined the kidneys of 122 cases (83 males and 39 females; average age, 64.8 years) autopsied at our facility. Using Image J, we analyzed the color of the cortex and medulla from photographs of bisected kidneys. We defined the color difference between the cortex and medulla in the L*a*b* color space as cortical-medullary color difference and performed a comparative analysis between the hemorrhage and control groups. Significant differences were observed in ΔL* and Δa* values between the two groups (p < 0.05 and p < 0.001, respectively). Analysis of Δa* values showed that the cortex was less reddish than the medulla in the hemorrhage group. The cutoff value for determining SKLA was set at Δa* = −1.33 (sensitivity, 0.79; specificity, 0.81; AUC, 0.859). Traditional evaluations of color rely on subjective assessments, which raise issues of reliability and reproducibility. This study successfully overcame the limitations of subjective evaluation by objectively assessing cortical-medullary color difference in the kidneys. Our results represent an important step towards improving the objectivity of color evaluations.

"休克肾样外观":客观评估失血性休克死亡患者的肾脏颜色变化
各种外伤导致的严重出血可引起失血性休克,而失血性休克很难通过法医学进行诊断。因此,我们将在失血性休克死亡病例中观察到的肾皮质和髓质之间的颜色差异定义为 "休克肾样外观(SKLA)",并使用数码相机和颜色分析软件对颜色差异进行数字化分析。本研究旨在开发和评估一种客观确定 SKLA 的方法,提高法医诊断的准确性。我们检查了在本机构解剖的 122 个病例(83 名男性和 39 名女性;平均年龄 64.8 岁)的肾脏。我们使用 Image J 分析了一分为二的肾脏照片中皮质和髓质的颜色。我们将皮质和髓质在 L*a*b* 色彩空间中的色差定义为皮质-髓质色差,并对出血组和对照组进行了比较分析。两组之间的 ΔL* 和 Δa* 值存在显著差异(分别为 p < 0.05 和 p < 0.001)。对Δa*值的分析表明,出血组的大脑皮层比髓质更红。确定 SKLA 的临界值定为 Δa* = -1.33 (灵敏度为 0.79;特异性为 0.81;AUC 为 0.859)。传统的颜色评估依赖于主观评估,这就产生了可靠性和可重复性问题。本研究通过客观评估肾脏皮质-髓质颜色差异,成功克服了主观评估的局限性。我们的研究结果是提高颜色评估客观性的重要一步。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Legal Medicine
Legal Medicine Nursing-Issues, Ethics and Legal Aspects
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
6.70%
发文量
119
审稿时长
7.9 weeks
期刊介绍: Legal Medicine provides an international forum for the publication of original articles, reviews and correspondence on subjects that cover practical and theoretical areas of interest relating to the wide range of legal medicine. Subjects covered include forensic pathology, toxicology, odontology, anthropology, criminalistics, immunochemistry, hemogenetics and forensic aspects of biological science with emphasis on DNA analysis and molecular biology. Submissions dealing with medicolegal problems such as malpractice, insurance, child abuse or ethics in medical practice are also acceptable.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信