{"title":"Lumbar Osteoarthritis in Patients with Osteoporosis Evaluated with the Lane and Wilke Scale and its Effect on Dexa Scores","authors":"Nurmuhammet Taş , Meltem Alkan Melikoğlu","doi":"10.1016/j.jocd.2024.101525","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><em>Objective:</em> This study aimed to compare bone mineral density (BMD) values in patients with lumbar osteoarthritis (OA) with and without osteoporosis (OP). This study evaluated the effect of lumbar osteoarthritis in patients with osteoporosis on Dexa scores using the Lane and Wilke scale.</p><p><em>Methods:</em> A total of 51 individuals with OA, 20 with OP, and 31 without OP were included in the study. Lumbar osteoarthritis was assessed and recorded using the Lane and Wilke scale. BMD was measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) at the waist and hip (femoral neck, lumbar vertebrae). Frax assessed the risk of osteoporosis and fracture risk.</p><p><em>Results:</em> The mean age of patients with OP was 68.1±8.2 years, and the mean age of patients without OP was 68.6±9.4 years. There was a significant decrease between the lumbar vertebrae and femoral neck BMD values of the two groups in favor of the osteoporosis group. The t-scores of the OP group were significantly lower (p = 0.045). All variables showed a statistically significant difference between the group with OP and those without OP (p<0.05). The median values of L1-L2, L2-L3, L3-L4, and total L1-L4 were higher in absolute value in the group with OP. In frax hip and frax primary osteoporosis, the median values were higher in the group with OP than in the group without OP (p = 0.023/p = 0.020). All L1-L2, L2-L3, and L3-L4 dexa parameters with and without OP were not significantly different between the groups according to the Lane and Wilke classification (p > 0.05).</p><p><em>Conclusion:</em> There was no statistically significant difference between DEXA parameters in osteoporosis and non-osteoporosis patients with low back osteoarthritis (according to the Lane and Wilke classification).</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50240,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Densitometry","volume":"27 4","pages":"Article 101525"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Densitometry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S109469502400060X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to compare bone mineral density (BMD) values in patients with lumbar osteoarthritis (OA) with and without osteoporosis (OP). This study evaluated the effect of lumbar osteoarthritis in patients with osteoporosis on Dexa scores using the Lane and Wilke scale.
Methods: A total of 51 individuals with OA, 20 with OP, and 31 without OP were included in the study. Lumbar osteoarthritis was assessed and recorded using the Lane and Wilke scale. BMD was measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) at the waist and hip (femoral neck, lumbar vertebrae). Frax assessed the risk of osteoporosis and fracture risk.
Results: The mean age of patients with OP was 68.1±8.2 years, and the mean age of patients without OP was 68.6±9.4 years. There was a significant decrease between the lumbar vertebrae and femoral neck BMD values of the two groups in favor of the osteoporosis group. The t-scores of the OP group were significantly lower (p = 0.045). All variables showed a statistically significant difference between the group with OP and those without OP (p<0.05). The median values of L1-L2, L2-L3, L3-L4, and total L1-L4 were higher in absolute value in the group with OP. In frax hip and frax primary osteoporosis, the median values were higher in the group with OP than in the group without OP (p = 0.023/p = 0.020). All L1-L2, L2-L3, and L3-L4 dexa parameters with and without OP were not significantly different between the groups according to the Lane and Wilke classification (p > 0.05).
Conclusion: There was no statistically significant difference between DEXA parameters in osteoporosis and non-osteoporosis patients with low back osteoarthritis (according to the Lane and Wilke classification).
研究目的本研究旨在比较伴有和不伴有骨质疏松症(OP)的腰椎骨关节炎(OA)患者的骨矿物质密度(BMD)值。该研究使用 Lane 和 Wilke 量表评估了骨质疏松症患者腰椎骨关节炎对 Dexa 评分的影响:研究共纳入了 51 名 OA 患者、20 名 OP 患者和 31 名无 OP 患者。使用 Lane 和 Wilke 量表对腰椎骨关节炎进行评估和记录。腰部和臀部(股骨颈、腰椎)的骨密度是通过双能 X 射线吸收仪(DEXA)测量的。Frax 评估了骨质疏松症风险和骨折风险:OP患者的平均年龄为(68.1±8.2)岁,无OP患者的平均年龄为(68.6±9.4)岁。两组患者的腰椎和股骨颈 BMD 值均有明显下降,骨质疏松症组更优。OP 组的 t 值明显较低(p = 0.045)。所有变量均显示,OP 组与无 OP 组之间的差异具有统计学意义(p<0.05)。有 OP 组的 L1-L2、L2-L3、L3-L4 和总 L1-L4 的中值绝对值更高。在髋关节骨质疏松症和原发性骨质疏松症方面,有 OP 组的中位值高于无 OP 组(p = 0.023/p = 0.020)。根据 Lane 和 Wilke 分类法,有 OP 组和无 OP 组的所有 L1-L2、L2-L3 和 L3-L4 dexa 参数均无显著差异(p > 0.05):结论:根据Lane和Wilke分类法,骨质疏松症和非骨质疏松症腰背骨关节炎患者的DEXA参数差异无统计学意义。
期刊介绍:
The Journal is committed to serving ISCD''s mission - the education of heterogenous physician specialties and technologists who are involved in the clinical assessment of skeletal health. The focus of JCD is bone mass measurement, including epidemiology of bone mass, how drugs and diseases alter bone mass, new techniques and quality assurance in bone mass imaging technologies, and bone mass health/economics.
Combining high quality research and review articles with sound, practice-oriented advice, JCD meets the diverse diagnostic and management needs of radiologists, endocrinologists, nephrologists, rheumatologists, gynecologists, family physicians, internists, and technologists whose patients require diagnostic clinical densitometry for therapeutic management.