Antithrombotic Strategies in Atrial Fibrillation After ACS and/or PCI

IF 21.7 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
{"title":"Antithrombotic Strategies in Atrial Fibrillation After ACS and/or PCI","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jacc.2024.06.022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The optimal antithrombotic regimen for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) who had an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) or have undergone percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is not known.</p></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>The authors sought to determine which antithrombotic regimen best balances safety and efficacy.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>AUGUSTUS, a multicenter 2 × 2 factorial design randomized trial compared apixaban with vitamin K antagonist (VKA) and aspirin with placebo in patients with AF with recent ACS and/or PCI treated with a P2Y<sub>12</sub> inhibitor. We conducted a 4-way analysis comparing safety and efficacy outcomes in the 4 randomized groups. The primary outcome was a composite of all-cause death, major or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding, or hospitalization for cardiovascular causes over 6-month follow-up. Secondary outcomes included individual components of the primary endpoint.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 4,614 patients were enrolled. All patients were treated with a P2Y<sub>12</sub> inhibitor. The primary endpoint occurred in 21.9% of patients randomized to apixaban plus placebo, 27.3% randomized to apixaban plus aspirin, 28.0% randomized to VKA plus placebo, and 33.3% randomized to VKA plus aspirin. Rates of major or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding and hospitalization for cardiovascular causes were lower with apixaban and placebo compared with the other 3 antithrombotic strategies. There was no difference between the 4 randomized groups with respect to all-cause death.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>In patients with AF and a recent ACS and/or PCI, an antithrombotic regimen that included a P2Y<sub>12</sub> inhibitor and apixaban without aspirin resulted in a lower incidence of the composite of death, bleeding, or cardiovascular hospitalization than regimens including VKA, aspirin, or both. (An Open-label, 2 x 2 Factorial, Randomized Controlled, Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Safety of Apixaban vs. Vitamin K Antagonist and Aspirin vs. Aspirin Placebo in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation and Acute Coronary Syndrome or Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; <span><span>NCT02415400</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>)</p></div>","PeriodicalId":17187,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American College of Cardiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":21.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American College of Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0735109724077453","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The optimal antithrombotic regimen for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) who had an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) or have undergone percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is not known.

Objectives

The authors sought to determine which antithrombotic regimen best balances safety and efficacy.

Methods

AUGUSTUS, a multicenter 2 × 2 factorial design randomized trial compared apixaban with vitamin K antagonist (VKA) and aspirin with placebo in patients with AF with recent ACS and/or PCI treated with a P2Y12 inhibitor. We conducted a 4-way analysis comparing safety and efficacy outcomes in the 4 randomized groups. The primary outcome was a composite of all-cause death, major or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding, or hospitalization for cardiovascular causes over 6-month follow-up. Secondary outcomes included individual components of the primary endpoint.

Results

A total of 4,614 patients were enrolled. All patients were treated with a P2Y12 inhibitor. The primary endpoint occurred in 21.9% of patients randomized to apixaban plus placebo, 27.3% randomized to apixaban plus aspirin, 28.0% randomized to VKA plus placebo, and 33.3% randomized to VKA plus aspirin. Rates of major or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding and hospitalization for cardiovascular causes were lower with apixaban and placebo compared with the other 3 antithrombotic strategies. There was no difference between the 4 randomized groups with respect to all-cause death.

Conclusions

In patients with AF and a recent ACS and/or PCI, an antithrombotic regimen that included a P2Y12 inhibitor and apixaban without aspirin resulted in a lower incidence of the composite of death, bleeding, or cardiovascular hospitalization than regimens including VKA, aspirin, or both. (An Open-label, 2 x 2 Factorial, Randomized Controlled, Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Safety of Apixaban vs. Vitamin K Antagonist and Aspirin vs. Aspirin Placebo in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation and Acute Coronary Syndrome or Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; NCT02415400)

ACS 和/或 PCI 后心房颤动的抗血栓策略
背景对于患有急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)或接受过经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的心房颤动(AF)患者,目前尚不清楚最佳的抗血栓治疗方案。方法AUGUSTUS是一项多中心2 × 2因子设计随机试验,在近期接受过P2Y12抑制剂治疗的ACS和/或PCI房颤患者中,比较了阿哌沙班、维生素K拮抗剂(VKA)和阿司匹林与安慰剂。我们对 4 个随机分组的安全性和有效性结果进行了 4 向分析比较。主要结果是随访 6 个月期间全因死亡、大出血或临床相关的非大出血或因心血管原因住院的复合结果。次要结果包括主要终点的各个组成部分。所有患者均接受了 P2Y12 抑制剂治疗。在随机接受阿哌沙班加安慰剂治疗的患者中,21.9%出现了主要终点;在随机接受阿哌沙班加阿司匹林治疗的患者中,27.3%出现了主要终点;在随机接受VKA加安慰剂治疗的患者中,28.0%出现了主要终点;在随机接受VKA加阿司匹林治疗的患者中,33.3%出现了主要终点。与其他三种抗血栓策略相比,阿哌沙班和安慰剂的大出血或临床相关的非大出血以及因心血管原因住院的比例较低。结论 在房颤和近期 ACS 和/或 PCI 患者中,与包含 VKA、阿司匹林或两者的方案相比,包含 P2Y12 抑制剂和阿哌沙班而不包含阿司匹林的抗栓方案可降低死亡、出血或心血管住院的综合发生率。(评估心房颤动合并急性冠状动脉综合征或经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者使用阿哌沙班与维生素 K 拮抗剂和阿司匹林与阿司匹林安慰剂的安全性的开放标签、2 x 2因子随机对照临床试验;NCT02415400)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
42.70
自引率
3.30%
发文量
5097
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of the American College of Cardiology (JACC) publishes peer-reviewed articles highlighting all aspects of cardiovascular disease, including original clinical studies, experimental investigations with clear clinical relevance, state-of-the-art papers and viewpoints. Content Profile: -Original Investigations -JACC State-of-the-Art Reviews -JACC Review Topics of the Week -Guidelines & Clinical Documents -JACC Guideline Comparisons -JACC Scientific Expert Panels -Cardiovascular Medicine & Society -Editorial Comments (accompanying every Original Investigation) -Research Letters -Fellows-in-Training/Early Career Professional Pages -Editor’s Pages from the Editor-in-Chief or other invited thought leaders
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信