UK parliamentary inquiry reports in forensic science – Plus ça change?

Q1 Social Sciences
Shrey Jhalani , Ruth M. Morgan , Amelia Shooter , John Cassella
{"title":"UK parliamentary inquiry reports in forensic science – Plus ça change?","authors":"Shrey Jhalani ,&nbsp;Ruth M. Morgan ,&nbsp;Amelia Shooter ,&nbsp;John Cassella","doi":"10.1016/j.fsisyn.2024.100549","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Forensic Science provision in England and Wales underpins scientific evidence in many criminal cases. The quality of scientific investigation by scientists and the presentation of science insights has been under scrutiny and it is increasingly established that multiple significant, deep-rooted and persistent issues exist in the Forensic Science ecosystem.</p><p>A thematic analysis of seven UK parliamentary inquiry reports that addressed Forensic Science and published since 2000, identified key themes and contextual factors. A matrix model that illustrates the connectivity between these themes and factors was produced. The primary issue identified was the challenge of the traditionally narrow focus of inquiries on specific elements of the Forensic Science ecosystem, rather than considering that ecosystem holistically.</p><p>Through the analysis of these seven inquiry reports, it was possible to develop a matrix which provides a structured framework to critically consider the interconnections, interdependencies and connectivity between the key elements of the Forensic Science ecosystem. The matrix serves to highlight the need for an integrated approach that brings together an understanding of each component of the system and their intersections and connections to address the Forensic Science ecosystem more holistically and address the root causes of key Forensic Science challenges within the criminal justice system. It is hoped that the insights identified in this study offer a starting point for broader discussions and strategic activities across the Forensic Science community to find pathways forward to address persistent deep-seated challenges that have been identified in Forensic Science and find solutions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36925,"journal":{"name":"Forensic Science International: Synergy","volume":"9 ","pages":"Article 100549"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589871X24000962/pdfft?md5=9dc0988197be9108d07f2fa45079d2bb&pid=1-s2.0-S2589871X24000962-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forensic Science International: Synergy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589871X24000962","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Forensic Science provision in England and Wales underpins scientific evidence in many criminal cases. The quality of scientific investigation by scientists and the presentation of science insights has been under scrutiny and it is increasingly established that multiple significant, deep-rooted and persistent issues exist in the Forensic Science ecosystem.

A thematic analysis of seven UK parliamentary inquiry reports that addressed Forensic Science and published since 2000, identified key themes and contextual factors. A matrix model that illustrates the connectivity between these themes and factors was produced. The primary issue identified was the challenge of the traditionally narrow focus of inquiries on specific elements of the Forensic Science ecosystem, rather than considering that ecosystem holistically.

Through the analysis of these seven inquiry reports, it was possible to develop a matrix which provides a structured framework to critically consider the interconnections, interdependencies and connectivity between the key elements of the Forensic Science ecosystem. The matrix serves to highlight the need for an integrated approach that brings together an understanding of each component of the system and their intersections and connections to address the Forensic Science ecosystem more holistically and address the root causes of key Forensic Science challenges within the criminal justice system. It is hoped that the insights identified in this study offer a starting point for broader discussions and strategic activities across the Forensic Science community to find pathways forward to address persistent deep-seated challenges that have been identified in Forensic Science and find solutions.

英国议会法医学调查报告 - Plus ça change?
英格兰和威尔士的法医学是许多刑事案件中科学证据的基础。科学家的科学调查质量和科学见解的呈现方式一直受到严格审查,而且越来越多的事实证明,在法医学生态系统中存在着多种重大、根深蒂固和长期存在的问题。对英国议会自 2000 年以来发布的七份涉及法医学的调查报告进行了专题分析,确定了关键主题和背景因素。我们制作了一个矩阵模型,说明这些主题和因素之间的联系。通过对这七份调查报告的分析,有可能建立一个矩阵,为批判性地考虑法医学生态系统关键要素之间的相互联系、相互依存和相互连接提供一个结构化框架。该矩阵强调了采取综合方法的必要性,这种方法将对系统各组成部分及其交叉和联系的理解结合在一起,以更全面地解决法医学生态系统问题,并从根本上解决刑事司法系统中法医学面临的主要挑战。我们希望本研究报告中提出的见解能为整个法医科学界更广泛的讨论和战略活动提供一个起点,从而找到解决法医科学中已发现的持续存在的深层次挑战的途径,并找到解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
75
审稿时长
90 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信