Evaluation of risk prediction scores for adults hospitalized with COVID-19 in a highly-vaccinated population, Aotearoa New Zealand 2022

IF 1.5 Q4 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
{"title":"Evaluation of risk prediction scores for adults hospitalized with COVID-19 in a highly-vaccinated population, Aotearoa New Zealand 2022","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ijregi.2024.100424","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>COVID-19 severity prediction scores need further validation due to evolving COVID-19 illness. We evaluated existing COVID-19 risk prediction scores in Aotearoa New Zealand, including for Māori and Pacific peoples who have been inequitably affected by COVID-19.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We conducted a multicenter retrospective cohort study in adults hospitalized with COVID-19 from January to May 2022, including all Māori and Pacific patients, and every second non-Māori, non-Pacific (NMNP) patient to achieve equal analytic power by ethnic grouping. We assessed the accuracy of existing severity scores (4C Mortality, CURB-65, PRIEST, and VACO) to predict death in the hospital or within 28 days.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of 2319 patients, 582 (25.1%) identified as Māori, 914 (39.4%) as Pacific, and 862 (37.2%) as NMNP. There were 146 (6.3%, 95% confidence interval 5.4-7.4%) deaths, with a predicted probability of death higher than observed mortality for VACO (10.4%), modified PRIEST (15.1%) and 4C mortality (15.5%) scores, but lower for CURB-65 (4.5%). C-statistics (95% CI) of severity scores were: 4C mortality: Māori 0.82 (0.75, 0.88), Pacific 0.87 (0.83, 0.90), NMNP 0.90 (0.86, 0.93); CURB-65: Māori 0.83 (0.69, 0.92), Pacific 0.87 (0.82, 0.91), NMNP 0.86 (0.80, 0.91); modified PRIEST: Māori 0.85 (0.79, 0.90), Pacific 0.81 (0.76, 0.86), NMNP 0.83 (0.78, 0.87); and VACO: Māori 0.79 (0.75, 0.83), Pacific 0.71 (0.58, 0.82), NMNP 0.78 (0.73, 0.83).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Following re-calibration, existing risk prediction scores accurately predicted mortality.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":73335,"journal":{"name":"IJID regions","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S277270762400095X/pdfft?md5=12b91021951bfed895a69fd6d281af9c&pid=1-s2.0-S277270762400095X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IJID regions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S277270762400095X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

COVID-19 severity prediction scores need further validation due to evolving COVID-19 illness. We evaluated existing COVID-19 risk prediction scores in Aotearoa New Zealand, including for Māori and Pacific peoples who have been inequitably affected by COVID-19.

Methods

We conducted a multicenter retrospective cohort study in adults hospitalized with COVID-19 from January to May 2022, including all Māori and Pacific patients, and every second non-Māori, non-Pacific (NMNP) patient to achieve equal analytic power by ethnic grouping. We assessed the accuracy of existing severity scores (4C Mortality, CURB-65, PRIEST, and VACO) to predict death in the hospital or within 28 days.

Results

Of 2319 patients, 582 (25.1%) identified as Māori, 914 (39.4%) as Pacific, and 862 (37.2%) as NMNP. There were 146 (6.3%, 95% confidence interval 5.4-7.4%) deaths, with a predicted probability of death higher than observed mortality for VACO (10.4%), modified PRIEST (15.1%) and 4C mortality (15.5%) scores, but lower for CURB-65 (4.5%). C-statistics (95% CI) of severity scores were: 4C mortality: Māori 0.82 (0.75, 0.88), Pacific 0.87 (0.83, 0.90), NMNP 0.90 (0.86, 0.93); CURB-65: Māori 0.83 (0.69, 0.92), Pacific 0.87 (0.82, 0.91), NMNP 0.86 (0.80, 0.91); modified PRIEST: Māori 0.85 (0.79, 0.90), Pacific 0.81 (0.76, 0.86), NMNP 0.83 (0.78, 0.87); and VACO: Māori 0.79 (0.75, 0.83), Pacific 0.71 (0.58, 0.82), NMNP 0.78 (0.73, 0.83).

Conclusions

Following re-calibration, existing risk prediction scores accurately predicted mortality.

对新西兰奥特亚罗瓦高度接种人群中因 COVID-19 而住院的成人的风险预测评分进行评估 2022 年
由于 COVID-19 疾病不断发展,COVID-19 严重程度预测评分需要进一步验证。我们对新西兰奥特亚罗瓦地区现有的 COVID-19 风险预测评分进行了评估,其中包括毛利人和太平洋岛民,他们受到 COVID-19 的影响并不公平。方法 我们对 2022 年 1 月至 5 月期间因 COVID-19 住院的成人进行了一项多中心回顾性队列研究,其中包括所有毛利人和太平洋岛民患者,以及每两名非毛利人、非太平洋岛民 (NMNP) 患者,以实现各族裔群体的平等分析能力。我们评估了现有严重程度评分(4C Mortality、CURB-65、PRIEST 和 VACO)预测住院期间或 28 天内死亡的准确性。共有 146 例(6.3%,95% 置信区间为 5.4-7.4%)患者死亡,VACO(10.4%)、改良 PRIEST(15.1%)和 4C 死亡率(15.5%)评分的预测死亡概率高于观察死亡率,但 CURB-65 的预测死亡概率低于观察死亡率(4.5%)。严重程度评分的 C 统计量(95% CI)为4C 死亡率毛利人 0.82 (0.75, 0.88),太平洋人 0.87 (0.83, 0.90),NMNP 0.90 (0.86, 0.93);CURB-65:毛利人 0.83 (0.69, 0.92),太平洋人 0.87 (0.82, 0.91),非毛利民族人口 0.86 (0.80, 0.91);修改后的 PRIEST:毛利人 0.85 (0.79, 0.90),太平洋人 0.81 (0.76, 0.86),非毛利民族人口 0.83 (0.78, 0.87);VACO:毛利人 0.85 (0.79, 0.90),太平洋人 0.81 (0.76, 0.86),非毛利民族人口 0.83 (0.78, 0.91)。87);VACO:毛利人 0.79(0.75,0.83),太平洋人 0.71(0.58,0.82),NMNP 0.78(0.73,0.83)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
IJID regions
IJID regions Infectious Diseases
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
64 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信