Effectiveness of different mixed physical barriers in controlling seawater intrusion in homogeneous and layered coastal aquifers

IF 4.9 Q2 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
{"title":"Effectiveness of different mixed physical barriers in controlling seawater intrusion in homogeneous and layered coastal aquifers","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.gsd.2024.101318","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The intrusion of salt water into coastal regions threatens water resources, especially in arid and semi-arid regions. It damages large quantities of fresh water in these regions, and the productivity of the freshwater abstraction wells declines. Management of seawater intrusion (SWI) is therefore needed to improve fresh groundwater in these regions. This study investigated 12 different configurations of mixed physical subsurface barriers (MPBs) to control SWI in homogeneous and heterogeneous layered aquifers. The effectiveness of different MPB locations and configurations was tested, including (i) a barrier wall on the landward side and the subsurface dams on the seaward side, (ii) a barrier wall on the seaward side and a subsurface dam on the landward side, and (iii) the barrier wall was placed above the subsurface dam, both with different permeabilities. All simulations were based on the SEAWAT code. The numerical model was validated against experimental data. The results showed that a permeable cut-off wall above an impermeable subterranean dam (case MPB-3) with different permeabilities resulted in a reduction of the seawater wedge of 91% and 92% for homogeneous and heterogeneous layered aquifers, respectively. When the barrier wall was placed on the land side and the dam on the seaside (case MPB-1), the reduction of the seawater wedge reached 83% and 85% for homogeneous and heterogeneous layered aquifers, respectively. In contrast, when the dam was placed on the land side and the wall on the seaside (case MPB-2), the saltwater wedge was reduced by 73% for both homogeneous and heterogeneous layered aquifers. In addition, a case study was conducted on the Biscayne aquifer, southeast Florida, USA, with homogeneous conditions. Seawater intrusion was reduced by 36% and 44% in case MPB-1, 41% and 38% in case MPB-2, and 43% and 46% in case MPB-3. These seawater intrusion control methods offer numerous benefits, including improving freshwater storage, effectively controlling salinity during droughts, and potentially improving contaminant management.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37879,"journal":{"name":"Groundwater for Sustainable Development","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352801X24002418/pdfft?md5=586219f7ec0de4ee3881606bc6a0f1dc&pid=1-s2.0-S2352801X24002418-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Groundwater for Sustainable Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352801X24002418","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The intrusion of salt water into coastal regions threatens water resources, especially in arid and semi-arid regions. It damages large quantities of fresh water in these regions, and the productivity of the freshwater abstraction wells declines. Management of seawater intrusion (SWI) is therefore needed to improve fresh groundwater in these regions. This study investigated 12 different configurations of mixed physical subsurface barriers (MPBs) to control SWI in homogeneous and heterogeneous layered aquifers. The effectiveness of different MPB locations and configurations was tested, including (i) a barrier wall on the landward side and the subsurface dams on the seaward side, (ii) a barrier wall on the seaward side and a subsurface dam on the landward side, and (iii) the barrier wall was placed above the subsurface dam, both with different permeabilities. All simulations were based on the SEAWAT code. The numerical model was validated against experimental data. The results showed that a permeable cut-off wall above an impermeable subterranean dam (case MPB-3) with different permeabilities resulted in a reduction of the seawater wedge of 91% and 92% for homogeneous and heterogeneous layered aquifers, respectively. When the barrier wall was placed on the land side and the dam on the seaside (case MPB-1), the reduction of the seawater wedge reached 83% and 85% for homogeneous and heterogeneous layered aquifers, respectively. In contrast, when the dam was placed on the land side and the wall on the seaside (case MPB-2), the saltwater wedge was reduced by 73% for both homogeneous and heterogeneous layered aquifers. In addition, a case study was conducted on the Biscayne aquifer, southeast Florida, USA, with homogeneous conditions. Seawater intrusion was reduced by 36% and 44% in case MPB-1, 41% and 38% in case MPB-2, and 43% and 46% in case MPB-3. These seawater intrusion control methods offer numerous benefits, including improving freshwater storage, effectively controlling salinity during droughts, and potentially improving contaminant management.

Abstract Image

不同混合物理屏障在控制同质和分层沿海含水层海水入侵方面的效果
盐水侵入沿海地区威胁着水资源,尤其是干旱和半干旱地区的水资源。海水入侵破坏了这些地区的大量淡水,淡水取水井的生产率也随之下降。因此,需要对海水入侵(SWI)进行管理,以改善这些地区的地下淡水状况。本研究调查了 12 种不同配置的地下混合物理屏障(MPB),以控制同质和异质层状含水层中的海水入侵。测试了不同 MPB 位置和配置的有效性,包括:(i) 向陆一侧为隔离墙,向海一侧为地下坝;(ii) 向海一侧为隔离墙,向陆一侧为地下坝;(iii) 隔离墙位于地下坝之上,两者的渗透率均不同。所有模拟均基于 SEAWAT 代码。数值模型与实验数据进行了验证。结果表明,在具有不同渗透率的不透水地下大坝(MPB-3)上方设置可渗透的隔离墙,可使同质和异质层状含水层的海水楔分别减少 91% 和 92%。当隔离墙建在陆地一侧,大坝建在海边时(MPB-1),同质和异质层状含水层的海水楔分别减少了 83% 和 85%。相反,当水坝建在陆地一侧,而围墙建在海边时(MPB-2 案例),同质和异质层状含水层的海水楔减少了 73%。此外,还对美国佛罗里达州东南部具有均质条件的比斯坎含水层进行了案例研究。在 MPB-1 案例中,海水入侵分别减少了 36% 和 44%;在 MPB-2 案例中,海水入侵分别减少了 41% 和 38%;在 MPB-3 案例中,海水入侵分别减少了 43% 和 46%。这些海水入侵控制方法好处多多,包括改善淡水储存、在干旱期间有效控制盐度,以及可能改善污染物管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Groundwater for Sustainable Development
Groundwater for Sustainable Development Social Sciences-Geography, Planning and Development
CiteScore
11.50
自引率
10.20%
发文量
152
期刊介绍: Groundwater for Sustainable Development is directed to different stakeholders and professionals, including government and non-governmental organizations, international funding agencies, universities, public water institutions, public health and other public/private sector professionals, and other relevant institutions. It is aimed at professionals, academics and students in the fields of disciplines such as: groundwater and its connection to surface hydrology and environment, soil sciences, engineering, ecology, microbiology, atmospheric sciences, analytical chemistry, hydro-engineering, water technology, environmental ethics, economics, public health, policy, as well as social sciences, legal disciplines, or any other area connected with water issues. The objectives of this journal are to facilitate: • The improvement of effective and sustainable management of water resources across the globe. • The improvement of human access to groundwater resources in adequate quantity and good quality. • The meeting of the increasing demand for drinking and irrigation water needed for food security to contribute to a social and economically sound human development. • The creation of a global inter- and multidisciplinary platform and forum to improve our understanding of groundwater resources and to advocate their effective and sustainable management and protection against contamination. • Interdisciplinary information exchange and to stimulate scientific research in the fields of groundwater related sciences and social and health sciences required to achieve the United Nations Millennium Development Goals for sustainable development.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信