Decomposer faecal food web and C sequestration in soil. Can near infrared spectroscopy describe transfers and transformations from fresh organic inputs to protected forms in soil aggregates?

IF 3.7 2区 农林科学 Q1 ECOLOGY
Maria Camila Buitrago, Amauri Garcia, Patrick Lavelle, Elena Velásquez
{"title":"Decomposer faecal food web and C sequestration in soil. Can near infrared spectroscopy describe transfers and transformations from fresh organic inputs to protected forms in soil aggregates?","authors":"Maria Camila Buitrago,&nbsp;Amauri Garcia,&nbsp;Patrick Lavelle,&nbsp;Elena Velásquez","doi":"10.1016/j.ejsobi.2024.103663","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study sought to characterize the transfer of agricultural organic inputs by macrofauna to the biogenic aggregate compartments of the soil and test the existence of a faecal food web process based on coprophagic feeding behaviours. In an experimental plantain crop field of Colombia, we applied the agroecological FBO (Fertilisation Bio Organique ®) technology, a nucleation technique which consists in planting perennial plants in 1.0 x 0.4 × 0.4 m deep trenches where low- and high-quality organic materials are added in a specific design, and endogeic earthworms are inoculated. We evaluated the effectiveness of Near Infrared Spectroscopy (NIRS) to track this flow of organic matter through different natural stages of decomposition represented by soil macroaggregates produced by soil macroinvertebrates as faecal pellets and casts. After one year, great part of the organic inputs had been either mineralized or incorporated into macroaggregates of different sizes and origins. Using NIRS and physicochemical laboratory analyses, we assessed the quality and quantity of organic matter in the different types of aggregates separated manually according to their origin: large biogenic aggregates (LBA), medium sized biogenic aggregates (MBA) and small biogenic aggregates (SBA); physical aggregates (PA), root aggregates (RA) and residual soil (RS).</p><p>Earlier studies had shown that these structures were presumably formed by the activity of macroinvertebrates of three different functional groups, Diplopoda and Isopoda litter transformers for SBA, epidendogeic earthworms for MBA and mesohumic endogeic earthworms for LBA, organized in a feeding succession.</p><p>A Coinertia analysis between showed significant covariation among the two sets of physico chemical (22 variables) and NIR spectral (100 different wavelength absorbances) characterization of 135 samples representative of the three classes of biogenic macroaggregates, physical aggregates and residual non macroaggregated soil, (RV = 0.55; p &lt; 0.001). This analysis clearly separated biogenic structures and ranked them according to their size, from small SBA to medium sized MBA and large LBA. Physical PA aggregates and RS residual soil were projected close to the LBAs in the coinertia factorial plan. Multiple combinatorial data analysis CDA, associated 5 specific wavelength absorbance ranges with aggregate types and residual soil. Along the sequence from small to large biogenic aggregates, residual soil and physical aggregates, wavelengths associated to easily decomposed substrates (in ranges 1708–1716 nm; 1796–1948 and 2164–2316 nm) had progressively decreasing absorbances. Substrates associated to slowly decomposing aromatic, alkane and phenolic substrates either increased (1420–1436) or decreased (1284–1380) along this sequence.</p><p>These results are compatible with the hypothesis of a progressive transformation and transfer of organic residues first into small biogenic aggregates that are presumably faecal pellets of Isopoda and Diplopoda, then to medium sized biogenic aggregates identified as casts of epiendogeic earthworms and finally to large biogenic aggregates expected to be the casts of the large endogeic earthworms present in these soils. A definitive verification of the hypothesis and the involvement of specific macroinvertebrates will require direct experimentation in controlled laboratory conditions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":12057,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Soil Biology","volume":"122 ","pages":"Article 103663"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Soil Biology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1164556324000694","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study sought to characterize the transfer of agricultural organic inputs by macrofauna to the biogenic aggregate compartments of the soil and test the existence of a faecal food web process based on coprophagic feeding behaviours. In an experimental plantain crop field of Colombia, we applied the agroecological FBO (Fertilisation Bio Organique ®) technology, a nucleation technique which consists in planting perennial plants in 1.0 x 0.4 × 0.4 m deep trenches where low- and high-quality organic materials are added in a specific design, and endogeic earthworms are inoculated. We evaluated the effectiveness of Near Infrared Spectroscopy (NIRS) to track this flow of organic matter through different natural stages of decomposition represented by soil macroaggregates produced by soil macroinvertebrates as faecal pellets and casts. After one year, great part of the organic inputs had been either mineralized or incorporated into macroaggregates of different sizes and origins. Using NIRS and physicochemical laboratory analyses, we assessed the quality and quantity of organic matter in the different types of aggregates separated manually according to their origin: large biogenic aggregates (LBA), medium sized biogenic aggregates (MBA) and small biogenic aggregates (SBA); physical aggregates (PA), root aggregates (RA) and residual soil (RS).

Earlier studies had shown that these structures were presumably formed by the activity of macroinvertebrates of three different functional groups, Diplopoda and Isopoda litter transformers for SBA, epidendogeic earthworms for MBA and mesohumic endogeic earthworms for LBA, organized in a feeding succession.

A Coinertia analysis between showed significant covariation among the two sets of physico chemical (22 variables) and NIR spectral (100 different wavelength absorbances) characterization of 135 samples representative of the three classes of biogenic macroaggregates, physical aggregates and residual non macroaggregated soil, (RV = 0.55; p < 0.001). This analysis clearly separated biogenic structures and ranked them according to their size, from small SBA to medium sized MBA and large LBA. Physical PA aggregates and RS residual soil were projected close to the LBAs in the coinertia factorial plan. Multiple combinatorial data analysis CDA, associated 5 specific wavelength absorbance ranges with aggregate types and residual soil. Along the sequence from small to large biogenic aggregates, residual soil and physical aggregates, wavelengths associated to easily decomposed substrates (in ranges 1708–1716 nm; 1796–1948 and 2164–2316 nm) had progressively decreasing absorbances. Substrates associated to slowly decomposing aromatic, alkane and phenolic substrates either increased (1420–1436) or decreased (1284–1380) along this sequence.

These results are compatible with the hypothesis of a progressive transformation and transfer of organic residues first into small biogenic aggregates that are presumably faecal pellets of Isopoda and Diplopoda, then to medium sized biogenic aggregates identified as casts of epiendogeic earthworms and finally to large biogenic aggregates expected to be the casts of the large endogeic earthworms present in these soils. A definitive verification of the hypothesis and the involvement of specific macroinvertebrates will require direct experimentation in controlled laboratory conditions.

分解者粪便食物网与土壤中的碳螯合。近红外光谱能否描述从新鲜有机输入到土壤团聚体中受保护形式的转移和转化?
本研究试图描述大型底栖动物将农业有机投入物转移到土壤生物聚集区的过程,并测试是否存在基于桡食性摄食行为的粪便食物网过程。在哥伦比亚的一块芭蕉作物试验田中,我们应用了农业生态 FBO(Fertilisation Bio Organique ®)技术,这是一种核化技术,包括在 1.0 x 0.4 x 0.4 米深的沟槽中种植多年生植物,并在沟槽中按照特定设计添加低质和优质有机材料,同时接种内生蚯蚓。我们评估了近红外光谱仪(NIRS)在跟踪有机物流经土壤大型无脊椎动物产生的以粪便颗粒和粪块为代表的土壤大颗粒物的不同自然分解阶段方面的有效性。一年后,大部分有机物已经被矿化或融入不同大小和来源的大颗粒中。利用近红外光谱和实验室理化分析,我们评估了不同类型聚集体中有机物的质量和数量,并根据其来源进行了人工分离:大型生物聚集体(LBA)、中型生物聚集体(MBA)和小型生物聚集体(SBA);物理聚集体(PA)、根聚集体(RA)和残留土壤(RS)。早先的研究表明,这些结构可能是由三个不同功能群的大型无脊椎动物的活动形成的,在 SBA 中为双足类和等足类垃圾转化器,在 MBA 中为表生蚯蚓,在 LBA 中为中生内生蚯蚓,它们以取食演替的方式组织在一起。对代表生物大团聚体、物理团聚体和残余非大团聚体三类土壤的 135 个样本进行的两组物理化学(22 个变量)和近红外光谱(100 个不同波长的吸光度)特征描述之间的协变分析表明,它们之间存在显著的协变关系(RV = 0.55;p <;0.001)。该分析清楚地将生物成因结构区分开来,并根据它们的大小进行排序,从小型 SBA 到中型 MBA 和大型 LBA。在共惯性因子计划中,物理 PA 聚集体和 RS 残土被投影到接近 LBA 的位置。多重组合数据分析 CDA 将 5 个特定波长吸光度范围与聚集体类型和残留土壤联系起来。沿着从小到大的生物集料、残余土壤和物理集料的顺序,与易分解基质相关的波长(波长范围为 1708-1716 nm、1796-1948 nm 和 2164-2316 nm)的吸光度逐渐降低。与缓慢分解的芳香族、烷烃和酚类底物有关的底物的吸光度则沿着这一顺序上升(1420-1436)或下降(1284-1380)。这些结果符合有机残留物逐步转化和转移的假说,即首先转化为小型生物聚集体,这些生物聚集体可能是等足目和双足目动物的粪便,然后转化为中型生物聚集体,这些中型生物聚集体被确定为外生蚯蚓的粪便,最后转化为大型生物聚集体,这些大型生物聚集体预计是存在于这些土壤中的大型内生蚯蚓的粪便。要最终验证这一假设和特定大型无脊椎动物的参与,需要在受控实验室条件下进行直接实验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Journal of Soil Biology
European Journal of Soil Biology 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
51
审稿时长
27 days
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Soil Biology covers all aspects of soil biology which deal with microbial and faunal ecology and activity in soils, as well as natural ecosystems or biomes connected to ecological interests: biodiversity, biological conservation, adaptation, impact of global changes on soil biodiversity and ecosystem functioning and effects and fate of pollutants as influenced by soil organisms. Different levels in ecosystem structure are taken into account: individuals, populations, communities and ecosystems themselves. At each level, different disciplinary approaches are welcomed: molecular biology, genetics, ecophysiology, ecology, biogeography and landscape ecology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信