Decision-making in action: How international-level professional football players gain an advantage

IF 3.1 2区 心理学 Q2 HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM
{"title":"Decision-making in action: How international-level professional football players gain an advantage","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.psychsport.2024.102722","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Understanding how both visual and contextual in-game information influences player’s attempts to gain an advantage over their opponent is key to understanding skilled decision-making in fast-ball sports. In the present study, we conducted semi-structured interviews with 15 male professional football players to explore their reported behaviours and perspectives on their in-game decision-making and the ways in which they adapt to gain an advantage over their opponent. Professional players who have competed internationally at either Under 17, Under 19, Under 21, or senior level took part in semi-structured interviews. The data were analysed using <em>reflexive</em> thematic analysis which generated four higher-order themes about players reported behaviours and perspectives on their decision-making and ways of gaining an advantage: (i) being “unpredictable”; (ii) option generation and invitation, comprising two sub-themes: (iia) generating and realising options in action; and (iib) act on what invites you in the moment; (iii) anticipation and awareness; and (iv) dictating and controlling the game. A key finding was that players attempts to gain an advantage were largely grounded in the aim of ‘being unpredictable’ through the use of deception and disguise, as well as deliberate manipulation of action sequences in order to make their actions ‘hard to read’. A further important finding was that players do not always seek a universal <em>optimal</em> decision, as their individual action capabilities influence their available options. These findings have important implications for the assessment of decision-making performance in future empirical research.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54536,"journal":{"name":"Psychology of Sport and Exercise","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S146902922400133X/pdfft?md5=d39717335f3935376a91f2bc29d50c2f&pid=1-s2.0-S146902922400133X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychology of Sport and Exercise","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S146902922400133X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Understanding how both visual and contextual in-game information influences player’s attempts to gain an advantage over their opponent is key to understanding skilled decision-making in fast-ball sports. In the present study, we conducted semi-structured interviews with 15 male professional football players to explore their reported behaviours and perspectives on their in-game decision-making and the ways in which they adapt to gain an advantage over their opponent. Professional players who have competed internationally at either Under 17, Under 19, Under 21, or senior level took part in semi-structured interviews. The data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis which generated four higher-order themes about players reported behaviours and perspectives on their decision-making and ways of gaining an advantage: (i) being “unpredictable”; (ii) option generation and invitation, comprising two sub-themes: (iia) generating and realising options in action; and (iib) act on what invites you in the moment; (iii) anticipation and awareness; and (iv) dictating and controlling the game. A key finding was that players attempts to gain an advantage were largely grounded in the aim of ‘being unpredictable’ through the use of deception and disguise, as well as deliberate manipulation of action sequences in order to make their actions ‘hard to read’. A further important finding was that players do not always seek a universal optimal decision, as their individual action capabilities influence their available options. These findings have important implications for the assessment of decision-making performance in future empirical research.

决策行动:国际级职业足球运动员如何获得优势》。
了解比赛中的视觉信息和上下文信息如何影响球员试图获得对对手的优势,是理解快球运动中熟练决策的关键。在本研究中,我们对 15 名男性职业足球运动员进行了半结构化访谈,以探讨他们报告的行为、对赛中决策的看法以及他们为获得对对手的优势而进行调整的方式。参加过国际比赛的 17 岁以下、19 岁以下、21 岁以下或高级别的职业球员参加了半结构化访谈。采用反思性主题分析法(Braun 等人,2016 年;Braun & Clarke,2019 年)对数据进行了分析,得出了四个高阶主题,分别涉及球员报告的行为以及对其决策和获得优势的方式的看法:(i) "不可预测";(ii) 选择的产生和邀请,包括两个子主题:(iia) 在行动中产生和实现选择;(iib) 根据当下的邀请采取行动;(iii) 预测和意识;以及 (iv) 主导和控制比赛。一个重要的发现是,棋手们试图获得优势的主要目的是通过使用欺骗和伪装以及故意操纵行动顺序,使自己的行动 "难以捉摸",从而达到 "难以预测 "的目的。另一个重要发现是,棋手并不总是寻求普遍的最佳决策,因为他们的个人行动能力会影响他们的可选方案。这些发现对未来实证研究中的决策绩效评估具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
5.90%
发文量
172
审稿时长
69 days
期刊介绍: Psychology of Sport and Exercise is an international forum for scholarly reports in the psychology of sport and exercise, broadly defined. The journal is open to the use of diverse methodological approaches. Manuscripts that will be considered for publication will present results from high quality empirical research, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, commentaries concerning already published PSE papers or topics of general interest for PSE readers, protocol papers for trials, and reports of professional practice (which will need to demonstrate academic rigour and go beyond mere description). The CONSORT guidelines consort-statement need to be followed for protocol papers for trials; authors should present a flow diagramme and attach with their cover letter the CONSORT checklist. For meta-analysis, the PRISMA prisma-statement guidelines should be followed; authors should present a flow diagramme and attach with their cover letter the PRISMA checklist. For systematic reviews it is recommended that the PRISMA guidelines are followed, although it is not compulsory. Authors interested in submitting replications of published studies need to contact the Editors-in-Chief before they start their replication. We are not interested in manuscripts that aim to test the psychometric properties of an existing scale from English to another language, unless new validation methods are used which address previously unanswered research questions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信