Safety of potassium-competitive acid blockers in the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Angela Tietto, Sofia Faggin, Carmelo Scarpignato, Edoardo Vincenzo Savarino, Maria Cecilia Giron
{"title":"Safety of potassium-competitive acid blockers in the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease.","authors":"Angela Tietto, Sofia Faggin, Carmelo Scarpignato, Edoardo Vincenzo Savarino, Maria Cecilia Giron","doi":"10.1080/17425255.2024.2397433","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are the first-line treatment for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). However, due to their intrinsic limitations, there are still unmet clinical needs that have fostered the development of potassium-competitive acid blockers (P-CABs). Currently, four different drugs (vonoprazan, tegoprazan, fexuprazan, and keverprazan) are marketed in some Asian countries, whereas only vonoprazan and tegoprazan are available in Western countries (USA and Brazil or Mexico, respectively).</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>This review summarizes the current knowledge on P-CABs acute and long-term safety in GERD treatment compared to that of PPIs. Full-text articles and abstracts were searched in PubMed.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>P-CABs proved to address some of the unmet clinical needs in GERD, with a favorable risk-benefit ratio compared to conventional PPIs. Preclinical and clinical findings have highlighted P-CAB safety to be superimposable, to that of PPIs, in short-term treatments, although further studies are warranted to monitor their effects in long-term therapy. From an epidemiological point of view, the paucity of rigorous data for many variables (e.g. age, ethnicity, drug interactions, comorbidities, genetic polymorphisms, interindividual susceptibility, and gut dysbiosis) deserves a worldwide framework of continuous pre/post-marketing pharmacovigilance programs to reduce potential confounding factors and accurately link acute and chronic P-CAB therapy to adverse outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":94005,"journal":{"name":"Expert opinion on drug metabolism & toxicology","volume":" ","pages":"53-68"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert opinion on drug metabolism & toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17425255.2024.2397433","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are the first-line treatment for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). However, due to their intrinsic limitations, there are still unmet clinical needs that have fostered the development of potassium-competitive acid blockers (P-CABs). Currently, four different drugs (vonoprazan, tegoprazan, fexuprazan, and keverprazan) are marketed in some Asian countries, whereas only vonoprazan and tegoprazan are available in Western countries (USA and Brazil or Mexico, respectively).

Areas covered: This review summarizes the current knowledge on P-CABs acute and long-term safety in GERD treatment compared to that of PPIs. Full-text articles and abstracts were searched in PubMed.

Expert opinion: P-CABs proved to address some of the unmet clinical needs in GERD, with a favorable risk-benefit ratio compared to conventional PPIs. Preclinical and clinical findings have highlighted P-CAB safety to be superimposable, to that of PPIs, in short-term treatments, although further studies are warranted to monitor their effects in long-term therapy. From an epidemiological point of view, the paucity of rigorous data for many variables (e.g. age, ethnicity, drug interactions, comorbidities, genetic polymorphisms, interindividual susceptibility, and gut dysbiosis) deserves a worldwide framework of continuous pre/post-marketing pharmacovigilance programs to reduce potential confounding factors and accurately link acute and chronic P-CAB therapy to adverse outcomes.

钾竞争性胃酸阻滞剂治疗胃食管反流病的安全性。
简介:质子泵抑制剂(PPIs)是治疗胃食管反流病(GERD)的一线药物。然而,由于其固有的局限性,临床需求仍未得到满足,这促进了钾竞争性酸阻滞剂(p-CABs)的开发。目前,有四种不同的药物(vonoprazan、tegoprazan、fexuprazan、keverprazan)在一些亚洲国家上市,而只有vonoprazan和tegoprazan在西方国家(分别为美国、巴西或墨西哥)上市:本综述总结了与 PPIs 相比,p-CABs 治疗胃食管反流病的急性和长期安全性方面的现有知识。专家观点:事实证明,p-CABs 能满足胃食管反流病尚未满足的部分临床需求,其风险效益比优于传统的 PPIs。临床前和临床研究结果表明,在短期治疗中,p-CAB 的安全性可与 PPIs 相媲美,但仍需进一步研究以监测其在长期治疗中的效果。从流行病学的角度来看,由于缺乏有关许多变量(如年龄、种族、药物相互作用、合并症、基因多态性、个体间易感性、微生物菌群失调)的严格数据,因此需要在全球范围内建立一个持续的上市前/后药物警戒计划框架,以减少潜在的混杂因素,并准确地将急性和慢性 p-CAB 治疗与不良后果联系起来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信