Quantification of the size of subchorionic hematoma causing pregnancy-related complications: a retrospective cohort study.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Tatsuya Yoshihara, Yasuhiko Okuda, Osamu Yoshino
{"title":"Quantification of the size of subchorionic hematoma causing pregnancy-related complications: a retrospective cohort study.","authors":"Tatsuya Yoshihara, Yasuhiko Okuda, Osamu Yoshino","doi":"10.1007/s10396-024-01488-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to establish criteria for defining \"large\" subchorionic hematoma (SCH) and assess its association with pregnancy complications.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This was a retrospective cohort study conducted at our institution between 2019 and 2020. We compared the size of SCH between the pregnancy-related complication and non-complication groups, using two measurement methods. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis determined cutoff values. Additionally, we compared the occurrence of pregnancy complications among three groups: large SCH group (above the cutoff value), non-large SCH group (below the cutoff value), and non-SCH group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 1305 singleton pregnancies managed during the study, 80 cases were diagnosed with SCH. Pregnancy complications occurred in 15 patients. The patients with pregnancy complications had significantly larger SCH sizes with both measurement methods. For each method, the cutoff values calculated from the ROC curve analysis were as follows: Method 1, 25% (area under the ROC curve [AUC], 0.662); Method 2, 30% (AUC, 0.624). In Method 1, we found a significantly higher occurrence of preterm delivery in the large SCH group (24.1%) than in the non-large SCH (4.2%) and non-SCH groups (5.3%; all p < 0.01). In Method 2, there was a significantly higher occurrence of preterm delivery in the large SCH group (33.3%) than in the non-large SCH (6.5%) and non-SCH groups (5.3%; all p < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Large SCHs may indicate a high risk of pregnancy-related complications. Among these, recognizing and managing cases that exceed the aforementioned cutoff value as high-risk cases may be beneficial for reducing pregnancy complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":50130,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Ultrasonics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Ultrasonics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10396-024-01488-y","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to establish criteria for defining "large" subchorionic hematoma (SCH) and assess its association with pregnancy complications.

Method: This was a retrospective cohort study conducted at our institution between 2019 and 2020. We compared the size of SCH between the pregnancy-related complication and non-complication groups, using two measurement methods. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis determined cutoff values. Additionally, we compared the occurrence of pregnancy complications among three groups: large SCH group (above the cutoff value), non-large SCH group (below the cutoff value), and non-SCH group.

Results: Of 1305 singleton pregnancies managed during the study, 80 cases were diagnosed with SCH. Pregnancy complications occurred in 15 patients. The patients with pregnancy complications had significantly larger SCH sizes with both measurement methods. For each method, the cutoff values calculated from the ROC curve analysis were as follows: Method 1, 25% (area under the ROC curve [AUC], 0.662); Method 2, 30% (AUC, 0.624). In Method 1, we found a significantly higher occurrence of preterm delivery in the large SCH group (24.1%) than in the non-large SCH (4.2%) and non-SCH groups (5.3%; all p < 0.01). In Method 2, there was a significantly higher occurrence of preterm delivery in the large SCH group (33.3%) than in the non-large SCH (6.5%) and non-SCH groups (5.3%; all p < 0.01).

Conclusion: Large SCHs may indicate a high risk of pregnancy-related complications. Among these, recognizing and managing cases that exceed the aforementioned cutoff value as high-risk cases may be beneficial for reducing pregnancy complications.

Abstract Image

导致妊娠相关并发症的绒毛膜下血肿大小的量化:一项回顾性队列研究。
目的:本研究旨在建立 "大 "绒毛膜下血肿(SCH)的定义标准,并评估其与妊娠并发症的关系:这是一项回顾性队列研究,于 2019 年至 2020 年在我院进行。我们使用两种测量方法比较了妊娠相关并发症组和非并发症组之间的绒毛膜下血肿大小。接收者操作特征(ROC)曲线分析确定了临界值。此外,我们还比较了三组妊娠并发症的发生情况:大型 SCH 组(高于临界值)、非大型 SCH 组(低于临界值)和非 SCH 组:结果:在研究期间处理的 1305 例单胎妊娠中,有 80 例被诊断为 SCH。15例患者出现妊娠并发症。在两种测量方法中,出现妊娠并发症的患者的 SCH 都明显增大。根据 ROC 曲线分析计算出的每种方法的临界值如下:方法 1 为 25%(ROC 曲线下面积 [AUC],0.662);方法 2 为 30%(AUC,0.624)。在方法 1 中,我们发现大型 SCH 组(24.1%)的早产发生率明显高于非大型 SCH 组(4.2%)和非 SCH 组(5.3%;均为 p 结论:大SCH可能预示着妊娠相关并发症的高风险。其中,将超过上述临界值的病例识别为高风险病例并加以管理,可能有利于减少妊娠并发症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
11.10%
发文量
102
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Medical Ultrasonics is the official journal of the Japan Society of Ultrasonics in Medicine. The main purpose of the journal is to provide forum for the publication of papers documenting recent advances and new developments in the entire field of ultrasound in medicine and biology, encompassing both the medical and the engineering aspects of the science.The journal welcomes original articles, review articles, images, and letters to the editor.The journal also provides state-of-the-art information such as announcements from the boards and the committees of the society.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信