Physician Associate/Assistant Program Medical Directors Are Important Advocates for the Physician Associate/Assistant Profession: Results From a National Pilot Study.

Q2 Health Professions
Marcia Bouton, Jennifer Wild, Charlotte Bolch, Katherine Mitzel, Tian Zhou
{"title":"Physician Associate/Assistant Program Medical Directors Are Important Advocates for the Physician Associate/Assistant Profession: Results From a National Pilot Study.","authors":"Marcia Bouton, Jennifer Wild, Charlotte Bolch, Katherine Mitzel, Tian Zhou","doi":"10.1097/JPA.0000000000000620","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This pilot study aimed to evaluate whether and how physician associate/assistant (PA) program medical directors play a role in advocating on behalf of PAs and what factors correlate with this.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study used a mixed-methods grounded theory approach and was deemed institutional review board exempt. After literature review, a survey was developed and piloted by study personnel and faculty to affirm validity. Recruits with known email addresses were sent a link to a survey that included demographic information and 10 Likert scale questions. There were 69 respondents, and the response rate was 26%. Fisher's exact test and analysis of variance were performed using the R program. A P-value <.05 indicated significance. Thematic analysis of qualitative data was performed using ChatGPT, followed by iterative analysis by the research team. Consensus was achieved for each response.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most of the respondents had the following characteristics: MD degree, male, White, practicing clinically, and worked as PA medical directors 8 to 12 hours per week. Participants did not support PA title change, nor had they engaged in legislative efforts to support optimal team practice. Participants were strong PA advocates by promoting PA leadership positions, PA employment, improved attitudes in health care organizations toward PAs, and securing clinical rotations. Many respondents (41%) felt that none of their professional organizations supported them in their role as PA program medical director.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Exploring ways to support continued advocacy by our valued PA program medical directors within PA professional organizations could be advantageous to PA program medical directors' professional growth and the PA profession.</p>","PeriodicalId":39231,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Physician Assistant Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Physician Assistant Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JPA.0000000000000620","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: This pilot study aimed to evaluate whether and how physician associate/assistant (PA) program medical directors play a role in advocating on behalf of PAs and what factors correlate with this.

Methods: The study used a mixed-methods grounded theory approach and was deemed institutional review board exempt. After literature review, a survey was developed and piloted by study personnel and faculty to affirm validity. Recruits with known email addresses were sent a link to a survey that included demographic information and 10 Likert scale questions. There were 69 respondents, and the response rate was 26%. Fisher's exact test and analysis of variance were performed using the R program. A P-value <.05 indicated significance. Thematic analysis of qualitative data was performed using ChatGPT, followed by iterative analysis by the research team. Consensus was achieved for each response.

Results: Most of the respondents had the following characteristics: MD degree, male, White, practicing clinically, and worked as PA medical directors 8 to 12 hours per week. Participants did not support PA title change, nor had they engaged in legislative efforts to support optimal team practice. Participants were strong PA advocates by promoting PA leadership positions, PA employment, improved attitudes in health care organizations toward PAs, and securing clinical rotations. Many respondents (41%) felt that none of their professional organizations supported them in their role as PA program medical director.

Discussion: Exploring ways to support continued advocacy by our valued PA program medical directors within PA professional organizations could be advantageous to PA program medical directors' professional growth and the PA profession.

医生助理/助理项目医务主任是医生助理/助理专业的重要倡导者:全国试点研究的结果。
简介:本试验性研究旨在评估医生助理/助理医师(PA)项目医务主任是否以及如何代表 PA 发挥倡导作用,以及与之相关的因素:本试验性研究旨在评估助理医师/助理医师(PA)项目的医务主任是否以及如何在代表助理医师进行宣传方面发挥作用,以及与此相关的因素有哪些:该研究采用了混合方法基础理论方法,并被视为机构审查委员会豁免的方法。在查阅文献后,研究人员和教职员工制定并试行了一份调查问卷,以确认其有效性。向已知电子邮件地址的新聘人员发送了一个调查链接,其中包括人口统计学信息和 10 个李克特量表问题。共有 69 人回复,回复率为 26%。使用 R 程序进行了费雪精确检验和方差分析。P 值结果:大多数受访者具有以下特征:医学博士学位、男性、白人、从事临床工作、每周担任助理医务主任 8 至 12 小时。受访者不支持改变助理医师的职称,也没有参与支持最佳团队实践的立法工作。参与者通过促进 PA 领导职位、PA 就业、改善医疗机构对 PA 的态度以及确保临床轮转等方式大力倡导 PA。许多受访者(41%)认为,他们的专业组织都不支持他们担任 PA 项目医务主任:讨论:探讨如何支持我们所珍视的 PA 项目医务主任在 PA 专业组织中继续发挥倡导作用,这对 PA 项目医务主任的专业成长和 PA 行业都是有利的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
109
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信