One Versus Three-Level Fusion in Patients Undergoing Multilevel Lumbar Decompression : Relative Perioperative Risks and Five-Year Revisions.

IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Spine Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-27 DOI:10.1097/BRS.0000000000005130
Philip P Ratnasamy, Michael J Gouzoulis, Sahir S Jabbouri, Daniel R Rubio, Jonathan N Grauer
{"title":"One Versus Three-Level Fusion in Patients Undergoing Multilevel Lumbar Decompression : Relative Perioperative Risks and Five-Year Revisions.","authors":"Philip P Ratnasamy, Michael J Gouzoulis, Sahir S Jabbouri, Daniel R Rubio, Jonathan N Grauer","doi":"10.1097/BRS.0000000000005130","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess relative odds of perioperative complications, readmissions, and 5-year survival to reoperation for patients undergoing 3-level lumbar decompression who undergo 3-level fusion relative to 1-level fusion.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients undergoing multilevel lumbar decompression may be indicated for fusion at one or more levels. The question of fusing only one level with indications such as spondylolisthesis or fusing all levels decompressed is of clinical interest in both the short and longer term.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Patients undergoing 3-level lumbar decompression were extracted from the PearlDiver M165Orto database. The subset of these patients undergoing concomitant 3-level and 1-level lumbar fusion were identified and matched 1:1 based on patient age, sex, and Elixhauser Comorbidity Index scores. The incidence and odds of 90-day postoperative adverse events were compared between the two groups by multivariable analysis, and a comparative 5-year survival to lumbar spinal reoperation was determined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After matching, 28,276 patients were identified as undergoing 3-level lumbar decompression with 3-level fusion and the same for those undergoing 3-level decompression with 1-level fusion. Controlling for patient age, sex, and Elixhauser Comorbidity Index, patients undergoing 3-level fusion had significantly greater odds ratio (OR) of many 90-day adverse events and aggregated any (OR: 1.42), serious (OR: 1.44), and minor (OR: 1.42) adverse events, as well as readmissions (OR: 1.51; P < 0.0001 for all). Five-year survival to reoperation was significantly lower for those undergoing 3-level decompression with 3-level fusion ( P < 0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients undergoing 3-level lumbar decompression who underwent 3-level fusion were found to be at significantly greater odds of 90-day postoperative adverse events, readmissions, and 5-year reoperations relative to those undergoing 1-level fusion. The current data support the concept of limiting fusion to the levels with specific indications in the setting of multilevel lumbar decompressions and not needing to match the decompression and fusion levels.</p>","PeriodicalId":22193,"journal":{"name":"Spine","volume":" ","pages":"E242-E247"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000005130","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study design: Retrospective cohort study.

Objective: To assess relative odds of perioperative complications, readmissions, and 5-year survival to reoperation for patients undergoing 3-level lumbar decompression who undergo 3-level fusion relative to 1-level fusion.

Background: Patients undergoing multilevel lumbar decompression may be indicated for fusion at one or more levels. The question of fusing only one level with indications such as spondylolisthesis or fusing all levels decompressed is of clinical interest in both the short and longer term.

Patients and methods: Patients undergoing 3-level lumbar decompression were extracted from the PearlDiver M165Orto database. The subset of these patients undergoing concomitant 3-level and 1-level lumbar fusion were identified and matched 1:1 based on patient age, sex, and Elixhauser Comorbidity Index scores. The incidence and odds of 90-day postoperative adverse events were compared between the two groups by multivariable analysis, and a comparative 5-year survival to lumbar spinal reoperation was determined.

Results: After matching, 28,276 patients were identified as undergoing 3-level lumbar decompression with 3-level fusion and the same for those undergoing 3-level decompression with 1-level fusion. Controlling for patient age, sex, and Elixhauser Comorbidity Index, patients undergoing 3-level fusion had significantly greater odds ratio (OR) of many 90-day adverse events and aggregated any (OR: 1.42), serious (OR: 1.44), and minor (OR: 1.42) adverse events, as well as readmissions (OR: 1.51; P < 0.0001 for all). Five-year survival to reoperation was significantly lower for those undergoing 3-level decompression with 3-level fusion ( P < 0.0001).

Conclusions: Patients undergoing 3-level lumbar decompression who underwent 3-level fusion were found to be at significantly greater odds of 90-day postoperative adverse events, readmissions, and 5-year reoperations relative to those undergoing 1-level fusion. The current data support the concept of limiting fusion to the levels with specific indications in the setting of multilevel lumbar decompressions and not needing to match the decompression and fusion levels.

腰椎多平面减压术患者的单层融合与三层融合:围手术期的相对风险和五年修订。
研究设计回顾性队列研究:目的:评估接受三椎间融合术的三椎间腰椎减压患者与接受一椎间融合术的患者在围手术期并发症、再入院率和五年生存率方面的相对几率:背景:接受多水平腰椎减压术的患者可能需要进行一个或多个水平的融合术。背景:接受多椎间孔减压术的患者可能有一个或多个椎间孔融合的适应症。在脊柱滑脱症等适应症下只融合一个椎间孔,还是融合所有减压椎间孔,这个问题在短期和长期内都具有临床意义:方法:从 PearlDiver M165Orto 数据库中提取了接受三级腰椎减压术的患者。方法:从PearlDiver M165Orto数据库中提取了接受三级腰椎减压术的患者,并根据患者的年龄、性别和Elixhauser合并症指数(ECI)评分,确定了同时接受三级和一级腰椎融合术的患者子集,并进行了1:1配对。通过多变量分析比较了两组患者术后 90 天不良事件的发生率和几率,并确定了腰椎再手术的五年生存率:结果:经过比对,28276 名患者被确定为接受了三级腰椎减压术和三级融合术,而接受三级腰椎减压术和一级融合术的患者也被确定为接受了三级腰椎减压术和一级融合术。研究发现,与接受一级融合术的患者相比,接受三级融合术的三级腰椎减压患者发生术后 90 天不良事件、再入院和五年内再次手术的几率明显更高。目前的数据支持这样一种理念,即在多层次腰椎减压的情况下,应将融合术限制在具有特定适应症的水平,而不必将减压和融合水平相匹配。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Spine
Spine 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
361
审稿时长
6.0 months
期刊介绍: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins is a leading international publisher of professional health information for physicians, nurses, specialized clinicians and students. For a complete listing of titles currently published by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and detailed information about print, online, and other offerings, please visit the LWW Online Store. Recognized internationally as the leading journal in its field, Spine is an international, peer-reviewed, bi-weekly periodical that considers for publication original articles in the field of Spine. It is the leading subspecialty journal for the treatment of spinal disorders. Only original papers are considered for publication with the understanding that they are contributed solely to Spine. The Journal does not publish articles reporting material that has been reported at length elsewhere.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信