Effects of various exercise interventions on motor function in cerebral palsy patients: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Neurological Sciences Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-27 DOI:10.1007/s10072-024-07741-z
Bingjie Wang, Hailiang Huang
{"title":"Effects of various exercise interventions on motor function in cerebral palsy patients: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.","authors":"Bingjie Wang, Hailiang Huang","doi":"10.1007/s10072-024-07741-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>A network meta-analysis was utilized to compare the rehabilitative effectiveness of different exercise interventions on motor function in cerebral palsy(CP) patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Computer searches were conducted across 9 databases, including PubMed, Cochrane Library, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, and others, to identify randomized controlled trials focusing on different exercise interventions aimed at enhancing motor function in CP patients. The search spanned from the inception of the databases to January 31, 2024.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>20 articles, encompassing 570 patients and evaluating three types of exercise interventions, were included in the analysis. Results showed that aerobic training, resistance training, and mixed training exhibited superior outcomes compared to the control group, as evidenced by improvements in Gross Motor Function Measure scores, muscle strength, gait speed, and 10-Meter Walk Test scores (P < 0.05). Furthermore, the network meta-analysis revealed that resistance training ranked highest in enhancing gross motor function and gait speed among CP patients, while mixed training was deemed most effective in improving muscle strength and 10-Meter Walk Test scores.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Exercise interventions have been shown to significantly improve motor function in CP patients. Among these, resistance training and mixed training stand out for their effectiveness in enhancing walking capabilities. Resistance training is specifically aimed at improving gross motor function, while mixed training focuses on increasing muscle strength.</p>","PeriodicalId":19191,"journal":{"name":"Neurological Sciences","volume":" ","pages":"5915-5927"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurological Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-024-07741-z","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: A network meta-analysis was utilized to compare the rehabilitative effectiveness of different exercise interventions on motor function in cerebral palsy(CP) patients.

Methods: Computer searches were conducted across 9 databases, including PubMed, Cochrane Library, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, and others, to identify randomized controlled trials focusing on different exercise interventions aimed at enhancing motor function in CP patients. The search spanned from the inception of the databases to January 31, 2024.

Results: 20 articles, encompassing 570 patients and evaluating three types of exercise interventions, were included in the analysis. Results showed that aerobic training, resistance training, and mixed training exhibited superior outcomes compared to the control group, as evidenced by improvements in Gross Motor Function Measure scores, muscle strength, gait speed, and 10-Meter Walk Test scores (P < 0.05). Furthermore, the network meta-analysis revealed that resistance training ranked highest in enhancing gross motor function and gait speed among CP patients, while mixed training was deemed most effective in improving muscle strength and 10-Meter Walk Test scores.

Conclusion: Exercise interventions have been shown to significantly improve motor function in CP patients. Among these, resistance training and mixed training stand out for their effectiveness in enhancing walking capabilities. Resistance training is specifically aimed at improving gross motor function, while mixed training focuses on increasing muscle strength.

Abstract Image

各种运动干预对脑瘫患者运动功能的影响:系统综述和网络荟萃分析。
目的:利用网络荟萃分析比较不同运动干预对脑瘫(CP)患者运动功能的康复效果:方法:在 9 个数据库(包括 PubMed、Cochrane Library、Scopus、Web of Science、Embase 等)中进行了计算机检索,以确定旨在增强 CP 患者运动功能的不同运动干预措施的随机对照试验。结果:20 篇文章被纳入分析,涉及 570 名患者,评估了三种类型的运动干预措施。结果表明,与对照组相比,有氧训练、阻力训练和混合训练的效果更佳,这体现在粗大运动功能测量评分、肌肉力量、步速和 10 米步行测试评分的改善上(P 结论:运动干预已被证明可以改善患者的运动功能,并提高患者的生活质量:运动干预已被证明能显著改善 CP 患者的运动功能。其中,阻力训练和混合训练在提高步行能力方面效果突出。阻力训练的具体目标是改善粗大运动功能,而混合训练则侧重于增强肌肉力量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neurological Sciences
Neurological Sciences 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
3.00%
发文量
743
审稿时长
4 months
期刊介绍: Neurological Sciences is intended to provide a medium for the communication of results and ideas in the field of neuroscience. The journal welcomes contributions in both the basic and clinical aspects of the neurosciences. The official language of the journal is English. Reports are published in the form of original articles, short communications, editorials, reviews and letters to the editor. Original articles present the results of experimental or clinical studies in the neurosciences, while short communications are succinct reports permitting the rapid publication of novel results. Original contributions may be submitted for the special sections History of Neurology, Health Care and Neurological Digressions - a forum for cultural topics related to the neurosciences. The journal also publishes correspondence book reviews, meeting reports and announcements.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信