Risk factors for the development of refeeding syndrome in adults: A systematic review.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Ping Zheng, Yilin Chen, Feng Chen, Min Zhou, Caixia Xie
{"title":"Risk factors for the development of refeeding syndrome in adults: A systematic review.","authors":"Ping Zheng, Yilin Chen, Feng Chen, Min Zhou, Caixia Xie","doi":"10.1002/ncp.11203","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Identifying patients with a particularly high risk of refeeding syndrome (RFS) is essential for taking preventive measures. To guide the development of clinical decision-making and risk prediction models or other screening tools for RFS, increased knowledge of risk factors is needed. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review to identify risk factors for the development of RFS. PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were searched from January 1990 until March 2023. Studies investigating demographic, clinical, drug use, laboratory, and/or nutrition factors for RFS were considered. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to appraise the methodological quality of included studies. Of 1589 identified records, 30 studies were included. Thirty-three factors associated with increased risk of RFS after multivariable adjustments were identified. The following factors were reported by two or more studies, with 0-1 study reporting null findings: a previous history of alcohol misuse, cancer, comorbid hypertension, high Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score, high Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score, low Glasgow coma scale score, the use of diuretics before refeeding, low baseline serum prealbumin level, high baseline level of creatinine, and enteral nutrition. The majority of the studies (20, 66.7%) were of high methodological quality. In conclusion, this systematic review informs on several risk factors for RFS in patients. To improve risk stratification and guide development of risk prediction models or other screening tools, further confirmation is needed because there were a small number of studies and a low number of high-quality studies on each factor.</p>","PeriodicalId":19354,"journal":{"name":"Nutrition in Clinical Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nutrition in Clinical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ncp.11203","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Identifying patients with a particularly high risk of refeeding syndrome (RFS) is essential for taking preventive measures. To guide the development of clinical decision-making and risk prediction models or other screening tools for RFS, increased knowledge of risk factors is needed. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review to identify risk factors for the development of RFS. PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were searched from January 1990 until March 2023. Studies investigating demographic, clinical, drug use, laboratory, and/or nutrition factors for RFS were considered. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to appraise the methodological quality of included studies. Of 1589 identified records, 30 studies were included. Thirty-three factors associated with increased risk of RFS after multivariable adjustments were identified. The following factors were reported by two or more studies, with 0-1 study reporting null findings: a previous history of alcohol misuse, cancer, comorbid hypertension, high Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score, high Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score, low Glasgow coma scale score, the use of diuretics before refeeding, low baseline serum prealbumin level, high baseline level of creatinine, and enteral nutrition. The majority of the studies (20, 66.7%) were of high methodological quality. In conclusion, this systematic review informs on several risk factors for RFS in patients. To improve risk stratification and guide development of risk prediction models or other screening tools, further confirmation is needed because there were a small number of studies and a low number of high-quality studies on each factor.

成人发生反食综合征的风险因素:系统综述。
识别反食综合征(RFS)风险特别高的患者对于采取预防措施至关重要。为了指导临床决策和风险预测模型或其他 RFS 筛查工具的开发,需要增加对风险因素的了解。因此,我们进行了一项系统性综述,以确定 RFS 发生的风险因素。我们检索了从 1990 年 1 月到 2023 年 3 月的 PubMed、EMBASE、Cochrane Library 和 Web of Science。研究考虑了调查 RFS 的人口统计学、临床、药物使用、实验室和/或营养因素的研究。采用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表评估纳入研究的方法学质量。在确定的 1589 条记录中,共纳入了 30 项研究。经多变量调整后,确定了 33 个与 RFS 风险增加相关的因素。有两项或两项以上的研究报告了以下因素,0-1 项研究报告的结果为空:既往有酗酒史、癌症、合并高血压、急性生理学和慢性健康评估 II 评分高、序贯器官衰竭评估评分高、格拉斯哥昏迷量表评分低、再进食前使用利尿剂、基线血清前白蛋白水平低、基线肌酐水平高和肠内营养。大多数研究(20 项,66.7%)的方法学质量较高。总之,本系统综述为患者的 RFS 提供了几个风险因素。为了改善风险分层并指导风险预测模型或其他筛查工具的开发,还需要进一步的确认,因为针对每个因素的研究数量较少且高质量的研究较少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
9.70%
发文量
128
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: NCP is a peer-reviewed, interdisciplinary publication that publishes articles about the scientific basis and clinical application of nutrition and nutrition support. NCP contains comprehensive reviews, clinical research, case observations, and other types of papers written by experts in the field of nutrition and health care practitioners involved in the delivery of specialized nutrition support. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信