Improving oxygenation in severe ARDS treated with VV-ECMO: comparative efficacy of moderate hypothermia and landiolol in a swine ARDS model.

IF 2.8 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Maud Vincendeau, Thomas Klein, Frederique Groubatch, N'Guyen Tran, Antoine Kimmoun, Bruno Levy
{"title":"Improving oxygenation in severe ARDS treated with VV-ECMO: comparative efficacy of moderate hypothermia and landiolol in a swine ARDS model.","authors":"Maud Vincendeau, Thomas Klein, Frederique Groubatch, N'Guyen Tran, Antoine Kimmoun, Bruno Levy","doi":"10.1186/s40635-024-00655-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) remains a significant challenge in critical care, with high mortality rates despite advancements in treatment. Venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO) is employed as salvage therapy for refractory cases. However, some patients may continue to experience persistent severe hypoxemia despite being treated with VV-ECMO. To achieve this, moderate hypothermia and short-acting selective β1-blockers have been proposed.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using a swine model of severe ARDS treated with VV-ECMO, this study investigated the efficacy of moderate hypothermia or β-blockade in improving arterial oxygen saturation (SaO<sub>2</sub>) three hours after VV-ECMO initiation. Primary endpoints included the ratio of VV-ECMO flow to cardiac output and arterial oxygen saturation before VV-ECMO start (H0) and three hours after ECMO start (H3). Secondary safety criteria encompassed hemodynamics and oxygenation parameters.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-two male pigs were randomized into three groups: control (n = 6), hypothermia (n = 9) and β-blockade (n = 7). At H0, all groups demonstrated similar hemodynamic and respiratory parameters. Both moderate hypothermia and β-blockade groups exhibited a significant increase in the ratio of VV-ECMO flow to cardiac output at H3, resulting in improved SaO<sub>2</sub>. At H3, despite a decrease in oxygen delivery and consumption in the intervention groups compared to the control group, oxygen extraction ratios across groups remained unchanged and lactate levels were normal.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In a swine model of severe ARDS treated with VV-ECMO, both moderate hypothermia and β-blockade led to an increase in the ratio of VV-ECMO flow to cardiac output resulting in improved arterial oxygen saturation without any impact on tissue perfusion.</p>","PeriodicalId":13750,"journal":{"name":"Intensive Care Medicine Experimental","volume":"12 1","pages":"74"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11349723/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Intensive Care Medicine Experimental","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40635-024-00655-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) remains a significant challenge in critical care, with high mortality rates despite advancements in treatment. Venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO) is employed as salvage therapy for refractory cases. However, some patients may continue to experience persistent severe hypoxemia despite being treated with VV-ECMO. To achieve this, moderate hypothermia and short-acting selective β1-blockers have been proposed.

Methods: Using a swine model of severe ARDS treated with VV-ECMO, this study investigated the efficacy of moderate hypothermia or β-blockade in improving arterial oxygen saturation (SaO2) three hours after VV-ECMO initiation. Primary endpoints included the ratio of VV-ECMO flow to cardiac output and arterial oxygen saturation before VV-ECMO start (H0) and three hours after ECMO start (H3). Secondary safety criteria encompassed hemodynamics and oxygenation parameters.

Results: Twenty-two male pigs were randomized into three groups: control (n = 6), hypothermia (n = 9) and β-blockade (n = 7). At H0, all groups demonstrated similar hemodynamic and respiratory parameters. Both moderate hypothermia and β-blockade groups exhibited a significant increase in the ratio of VV-ECMO flow to cardiac output at H3, resulting in improved SaO2. At H3, despite a decrease in oxygen delivery and consumption in the intervention groups compared to the control group, oxygen extraction ratios across groups remained unchanged and lactate levels were normal.

Conclusions: In a swine model of severe ARDS treated with VV-ECMO, both moderate hypothermia and β-blockade led to an increase in the ratio of VV-ECMO flow to cardiac output resulting in improved arterial oxygen saturation without any impact on tissue perfusion.

改善使用 VV-ECMO 治疗重度 ARDS 患者的氧合情况:中度低温和兰地洛尔在猪 ARDS 模型中的疗效比较。
背景:急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)仍然是重症监护领域的重大挑战,尽管治疗手段不断进步,但死亡率仍然很高。静脉体外膜肺氧合(VV-ECMO)被用作难治性病例的挽救疗法。然而,一些患者尽管接受了静脉体外膜肺氧合治疗,但仍可能持续出现严重的低氧血症。为此,有人提出了适度低温和短效选择性β1受体阻滞剂的建议:方法:本研究利用用 VV-ECMO 治疗重度 ARDS 的猪模型,调查了适度低温或 β 受体阻滞剂在 VV-ECMO 启动三小时后改善动脉血氧饱和度(SaO2)的效果。主要终点包括 VV-ECMO 启动前(H0)和 ECMO 启动三小时后(H3)的 VV-ECMO 流量与心输出量和动脉血氧饱和度之比。次要安全性标准包括血液动力学和氧合参数:22 头雄性猪被随机分为三组:对照组(n = 6)、低体温组(n = 9)和 β 受体阻滞组(n = 7)。在 H0 时,所有组的血液动力学和呼吸参数相似。在 H3 时,中度低体温组和 β 受体阻滞组的 VV-ECMO 流量与心输出量之比均显著增加,从而改善了 SaO2。在H3时,尽管干预组的氧输送量和消耗量与对照组相比有所下降,但各组的氧萃取比保持不变,乳酸水平正常:结论:在用 VV-ECMO 治疗严重 ARDS 的猪模型中,中度低温和 β 受体阻滞都能提高 VV-ECMO 流量与心输出量的比率,从而改善动脉血氧饱和度,而对组织灌注没有任何影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Intensive Care Medicine Experimental
Intensive Care Medicine Experimental CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE-
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
2.90%
发文量
48
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信