The use of reduced DOAC doses in atrial fibrillation patients does not always lead to good anticoagulation levels and avoid adverse events

IF 4.3 3区 材料科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
Gualtiero Palareti , Sophie Testa , Cristina Legnani , Oriana Paoletti , Michela Cini , Emilia Antonucci , Vittorio Pengo , Daniela Poli , Walter Ageno , Paolo Prandoni , Domenico Prisco , Alberto Tosetto , for the MAS Study group
{"title":"The use of reduced DOAC doses in atrial fibrillation patients does not always lead to good anticoagulation levels and avoid adverse events","authors":"Gualtiero Palareti ,&nbsp;Sophie Testa ,&nbsp;Cristina Legnani ,&nbsp;Oriana Paoletti ,&nbsp;Michela Cini ,&nbsp;Emilia Antonucci ,&nbsp;Vittorio Pengo ,&nbsp;Daniela Poli ,&nbsp;Walter Ageno ,&nbsp;Paolo Prandoni ,&nbsp;Domenico Prisco ,&nbsp;Alberto Tosetto ,&nbsp;for the MAS Study group","doi":"10.1016/j.ijcard.2024.132484","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The MAS study (Blood Advances 2024) showed that a high proportion of Italian AF patients treated with direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) receive reduced doses. This sub-analysis of MAS data aimed to analyze the effects of reduced (appropriate or not)- or standard-dose use on DOAC activity assessed at baseline and the occurrence of thrombotic or bleeding complications during follow-up.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The MAS study design, the methods for DOAC measurement, the results, and the adverse events during follow-up, are described in detail elsewhere.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Seven hundred AF patients (42 % of the total 1657) received a reduced dose (considered inappropriate in 140 [20 %]). They were older, more frequently women, with lower body mass index (BMI), hemoglobin levels, and creatinine clearance. They more often had cerebral or cardiovascular diseases, were taking more medications, with higher scores for thrombotic or bleeding risk. Despite the use of low doses, 133 (19.0 %) patients had high standardized C-trough DOAC levels and experienced a high proportion of bleeding events (8.3 % per year). Conversely, some patients (4.7 %) had very low levels, resulting in a high incidence of thrombotic events (6.7 % per year). No difference was detected if the reduced dose was appropriate or not.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The unpredictable, highly variable inter-individual anticoagulant effect of DOACs may lead to either too low or too high anticoagulant levels, increasing the risk of thrombotic or bleeding events. This is particularly relevant for patients with high-risk conditions, such as those chosen for reduced-dose treatment. Further studies are needed to investigate this important clinical issue.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":3,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167527324011069","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The MAS study (Blood Advances 2024) showed that a high proportion of Italian AF patients treated with direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) receive reduced doses. This sub-analysis of MAS data aimed to analyze the effects of reduced (appropriate or not)- or standard-dose use on DOAC activity assessed at baseline and the occurrence of thrombotic or bleeding complications during follow-up.

Methods

The MAS study design, the methods for DOAC measurement, the results, and the adverse events during follow-up, are described in detail elsewhere.

Results

Seven hundred AF patients (42 % of the total 1657) received a reduced dose (considered inappropriate in 140 [20 %]). They were older, more frequently women, with lower body mass index (BMI), hemoglobin levels, and creatinine clearance. They more often had cerebral or cardiovascular diseases, were taking more medications, with higher scores for thrombotic or bleeding risk. Despite the use of low doses, 133 (19.0 %) patients had high standardized C-trough DOAC levels and experienced a high proportion of bleeding events (8.3 % per year). Conversely, some patients (4.7 %) had very low levels, resulting in a high incidence of thrombotic events (6.7 % per year). No difference was detected if the reduced dose was appropriate or not.

Conclusion

The unpredictable, highly variable inter-individual anticoagulant effect of DOACs may lead to either too low or too high anticoagulant levels, increasing the risk of thrombotic or bleeding events. This is particularly relevant for patients with high-risk conditions, such as those chosen for reduced-dose treatment. Further studies are needed to investigate this important clinical issue.

心房颤动患者使用较小剂量的 DOAC 并不总能达到良好的抗凝水平和避免不良事件的发生。
背景:MAS研究(Blood Advances 2024)显示,接受直接口服抗凝血剂(DOACs)治疗的意大利房颤患者中有很大一部分接受了减量治疗。这项对 MAS 数据的子分析旨在分析减量(适当或不适当)或标准剂量使用对基线评估的 DOAC 活性以及随访期间血栓或出血并发症发生率的影响:MAS研究的设计、DOAC测量方法、结果以及随访期间的不良事件在其他地方有详细描述:700名房颤患者(占总数1657人的42%)接受了减量治疗(其中140人[20%]被认为不合适)。他们年龄较大,多为女性,体重指数(BMI)、血红蛋白水平和肌酐清除率较低。他们多患有脑部或心血管疾病,服用的药物较多,血栓或出血风险评分较高。尽管使用的剂量较低,但仍有 133 例(19.0%)患者的标准 C-trough DOAC 水平较高,发生出血事件的比例也较高(每年 8.3%)。相反,一些患者(4.7%)的 DOAC 水平很低,导致血栓事件发生率很高(每年 6.7%)。结论:降低剂量是否合适并无差异:结论:DOACs 的抗凝效果不可预测,个体间差异很大,可能导致抗凝剂水平过低或过高,增加血栓或出血事件的风险。这与高危患者(如选择减量治疗的患者)尤其相关。这一重要的临床问题还需要进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
567
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信