David R. Pillow , Janelle Kohler , Candace Bowers , Stephanie Mills , Meghan A. Crabtree
{"title":"Expressing and negotiating identities in social media ecosystems: A typology of users and their associated personality profiles","authors":"David R. Pillow , Janelle Kohler , Candace Bowers , Stephanie Mills , Meghan A. Crabtree","doi":"10.1016/j.paid.2024.112824","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In social media research, many make a distinction between active use and passive use. This distinction may focus too simplistically on the quantity of content shared rather than the qualitative ways that individuals present themselves online. Informed by self-monitoring theory, this paper examines whether there exist distinct classes of individuals who vary with respect to how actively and selectively they present themselves online. Participants reported on measures assessing open disclosure (feeling that one can share anything), restricting audiences (limiting the telling of one's story to only some audience members), limiting identities (sharing only specific identity aspects online), passive use (reading the content of others), and extent of posting content. A latent class analysis of these assessments (<span><math><mi>N</mi><mo>=</mo><mn>391</mn></math></span>) identified four types of persons: active authentic (openly sharing without restrictions), active negotiators (sharing with audience restrictions via limited aspects of self), quiet authentic (feeling free to share, but not doing so often), and passive restrictive (low use with restricted audiences and limited identities). A mixed ANOVA using the HEXACO found that the four user types differ most notably on extraversion and emotionality. Implications are discussed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48467,"journal":{"name":"Personality and Individual Differences","volume":"232 ","pages":"Article 112824"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Personality and Individual Differences","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191886924002848","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In social media research, many make a distinction between active use and passive use. This distinction may focus too simplistically on the quantity of content shared rather than the qualitative ways that individuals present themselves online. Informed by self-monitoring theory, this paper examines whether there exist distinct classes of individuals who vary with respect to how actively and selectively they present themselves online. Participants reported on measures assessing open disclosure (feeling that one can share anything), restricting audiences (limiting the telling of one's story to only some audience members), limiting identities (sharing only specific identity aspects online), passive use (reading the content of others), and extent of posting content. A latent class analysis of these assessments () identified four types of persons: active authentic (openly sharing without restrictions), active negotiators (sharing with audience restrictions via limited aspects of self), quiet authentic (feeling free to share, but not doing so often), and passive restrictive (low use with restricted audiences and limited identities). A mixed ANOVA using the HEXACO found that the four user types differ most notably on extraversion and emotionality. Implications are discussed.
期刊介绍:
Personality and Individual Differences is devoted to the publication of articles (experimental, theoretical, review) which aim to integrate as far as possible the major factors of personality with empirical paradigms from experimental, physiological, animal, clinical, educational, criminological or industrial psychology or to seek an explanation for the causes and major determinants of individual differences in concepts derived from these disciplines. The editors are concerned with both genetic and environmental causes, and they are particularly interested in possible interaction effects.