Correlation of Macular Ganglion Cell Layer + Inner Plexiform Layer (GCL + IPL) and Circumpapillary Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer (cRNFL) Thickness in Glaucoma Suspects and Glaucomatous Eyes.

Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) Pub Date : 2024-08-20 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.2147/OPTH.S439501
Marie Jeremy B San Pedro, George Michael N Sosuan, Maria Imelda R Yap-Veloso
{"title":"Correlation of Macular Ganglion Cell Layer + Inner Plexiform Layer (GCL + IPL) and Circumpapillary Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer (cRNFL) Thickness in Glaucoma Suspects and Glaucomatous Eyes.","authors":"Marie Jeremy B San Pedro, George Michael N Sosuan, Maria Imelda R Yap-Veloso","doi":"10.2147/OPTH.S439501","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The study aimed to correlate macular ganglion cell layer + inner plexiform layer (GCL + IPL) thickness and circumpapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (cRNFL) thickness and to determine the validity of GCL + IPL in the evaluation of glaucoma across different stages using the area under the curve (AUC) analysis in comparison to cRNFL.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>The charts of 260 adult glaucoma suspect and glaucoma patients having macular ganglion cell analysis, optical coherence tomography (OCT) of the cRNFL and automated visual field (AVF) were reviewed. GCL + IPL thickness (average, minimum and sectoral) and sectoral cRNFL thickness were obtained. Glaucomatous eyes were further classified into stages based on the Hodapp-Anderson-Parrish Visual Field Criteria of Glaucoma Severity. AUC analysis was used to compare GCL + IPL parameters with cRNFL in glaucoma suspects and glaucoma patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 122 eyes were included in the study and were grouped into glaucoma suspects (n = 43), early or mild glaucoma (n = 40), and moderate-to-severe glaucoma (n = 39). Both GCL + IPL and cRNFL thickness parameters showed a significant decline with greater glaucoma severity. In the determination of visual field defects across all glaucoma stages, the highest AUC was obtained by minimum GCL + IPL (AUC = 0.859) with cut-off value at ≤70 µm. Average GCL + IPL had the highest AUC (0.835) in detecting progression from glaucoma suspect to mild glaucoma, while the inferior sector of the cRNFL had the highest AUC (0.937) in discerning mild from moderate-to-severe glaucoma.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results of this study highlight the significance of macular ganglion cell analysis in the screening, detection and staging of glaucoma. Compared to cRNFL, macular ganglion analysis may be more beneficial in glaucoma screening and detecting progression from glaucoma suspect to mild glaucoma.</p>","PeriodicalId":93945,"journal":{"name":"Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11344544/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S439501","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The study aimed to correlate macular ganglion cell layer + inner plexiform layer (GCL + IPL) thickness and circumpapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (cRNFL) thickness and to determine the validity of GCL + IPL in the evaluation of glaucoma across different stages using the area under the curve (AUC) analysis in comparison to cRNFL.

Patients and methods: The charts of 260 adult glaucoma suspect and glaucoma patients having macular ganglion cell analysis, optical coherence tomography (OCT) of the cRNFL and automated visual field (AVF) were reviewed. GCL + IPL thickness (average, minimum and sectoral) and sectoral cRNFL thickness were obtained. Glaucomatous eyes were further classified into stages based on the Hodapp-Anderson-Parrish Visual Field Criteria of Glaucoma Severity. AUC analysis was used to compare GCL + IPL parameters with cRNFL in glaucoma suspects and glaucoma patients.

Results: A total of 122 eyes were included in the study and were grouped into glaucoma suspects (n = 43), early or mild glaucoma (n = 40), and moderate-to-severe glaucoma (n = 39). Both GCL + IPL and cRNFL thickness parameters showed a significant decline with greater glaucoma severity. In the determination of visual field defects across all glaucoma stages, the highest AUC was obtained by minimum GCL + IPL (AUC = 0.859) with cut-off value at ≤70 µm. Average GCL + IPL had the highest AUC (0.835) in detecting progression from glaucoma suspect to mild glaucoma, while the inferior sector of the cRNFL had the highest AUC (0.937) in discerning mild from moderate-to-severe glaucoma.

Conclusion: The results of this study highlight the significance of macular ganglion cell analysis in the screening, detection and staging of glaucoma. Compared to cRNFL, macular ganglion analysis may be more beneficial in glaucoma screening and detecting progression from glaucoma suspect to mild glaucoma.

青光眼疑似患者和青光眼患者眼底黄斑神经节细胞层+内层丛状层(GCL + IPL)与环毛细视网膜神经纤维层(cRNFL)厚度的相关性。
目的:该研究旨在将黄斑神经节细胞层+内丛状层(GCL + IPL)厚度与环毛细血管视网膜神经纤维层(cRNFL)厚度相关联,并使用曲线下面积(AUC)分析与cRNFL进行比较,确定GCL + IPL在评估不同阶段青光眼中的有效性:对 260 名成年青光眼疑似患者和青光眼患者进行黄斑神经节细胞分析、cRNFL 光学相干断层扫描(OCT)和自动视野(AVF)检查。获得了 GCL + IPL 厚度(平均、最小和扇形)和扇形 cRNFL 厚度。根据青光眼严重程度的 Hodapp-Anderson-Parrish 视野标准,将青光眼眼球进一步分期。使用AUC分析比较青光眼疑似患者和青光眼患者的GCL + IPL参数和cRNFL:研究共纳入了 122 只眼睛,分为青光眼疑似患者(43 只)、早期或轻度青光眼(40 只)和中重度青光眼(39 只)。随着青光眼严重程度的增加,GCL + IPL 和 cRNFL 厚度参数均显著下降。在确定各期青光眼的视野缺损时,最小 GCL + IPL 的 AUC 最高(AUC = 0.859),临界值≤70 µm。平均 GCL + IPL 在检测从疑似青光眼到轻度青光眼的进展方面具有最高的 AUC(0.835),而 cRNFL 的下半部分在区分轻度和中重度青光眼方面具有最高的 AUC(0.937):本研究的结果凸显了黄斑神经节细胞分析在青光眼筛查、检测和分期中的重要性。与cRNFL相比,黄斑神经节细胞分析可能更有利于青光眼筛查和检测从青光眼疑似患者到轻度青光眼的进展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信