Dose-dependent target engagement of a clinical iTBS protocol: An interleaved TMS-fMRI study in healthy subjects.

Kai-Yen Chang, Martin Tik, Yuki Mizutani-Tiebel, Paul Taylor, Timo van Hattem, Peter Falkai, Frank Padberg, Lucia Bulubas, Daniel Keeser
{"title":"Dose-dependent target engagement of a clinical iTBS protocol: An interleaved TMS-fMRI study in healthy subjects.","authors":"Kai-Yen Chang, Martin Tik, Yuki Mizutani-Tiebel, Paul Taylor, Timo van Hattem, Peter Falkai, Frank Padberg, Lucia Bulubas, Daniel Keeser","doi":"10.1016/j.bpsc.2024.08.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) is widely applied as therapeutic intervention in mental health, however understanding of its mechanisms is still incomplete. Prior MRI studies have mainly used offline iTBS or short sequences in concurrent TMS-fMRI. This study investigated a full 600 stimuli iTBS protocol using interleaved TMS-fMRI in comparison with two control conditions in healthy subjects.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a crossover design, 18 participants underwent three sessions of interleaved iTBS-fMRI: 1) left DLPFC at 40% resting motor threshold (rMT) intensity, 2) left DLPFC at 80% rMT intensity, and 3) left primary motor cortex (M1) at 80% rMT intensity. We compared immediate blood-oxygen-level-dependent (BOLD) responses during interleaved iTBS-fMRI across these conditions including correlations between individual fMRI BOLD activation and iTBS induced electric field (E-field) strength at the target sites.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Whole-brain analysis showed increased activation in several regions following iTBS. Specifically, left DLPFC, as well as bilateral M1, anterior cingulate cortex, and insula showed increased activation during 80% rMT left DLPFC stimulation. Increased BOLD activity in the left DLPFC was not observed with 40% rMT left DLPFC stimulation nor left M1 80% rMT iTBS, whereas activation in other regions was found to overlap between conditions. Of note, BOLD activation and E-field intensities were only correlated for M1 stimulation, but not for the DLPFC conditions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study showed dosage and target specific BOLD activation during interleaved TMS-fMRI with 600 stimuli iTBS in healthy subjects. Future studies may use our approach for demonstrating target engagement.</p>","PeriodicalId":93900,"journal":{"name":"Biological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpsc.2024.08.009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) is widely applied as therapeutic intervention in mental health, however understanding of its mechanisms is still incomplete. Prior MRI studies have mainly used offline iTBS or short sequences in concurrent TMS-fMRI. This study investigated a full 600 stimuli iTBS protocol using interleaved TMS-fMRI in comparison with two control conditions in healthy subjects.

Methods: In a crossover design, 18 participants underwent three sessions of interleaved iTBS-fMRI: 1) left DLPFC at 40% resting motor threshold (rMT) intensity, 2) left DLPFC at 80% rMT intensity, and 3) left primary motor cortex (M1) at 80% rMT intensity. We compared immediate blood-oxygen-level-dependent (BOLD) responses during interleaved iTBS-fMRI across these conditions including correlations between individual fMRI BOLD activation and iTBS induced electric field (E-field) strength at the target sites.

Results: Whole-brain analysis showed increased activation in several regions following iTBS. Specifically, left DLPFC, as well as bilateral M1, anterior cingulate cortex, and insula showed increased activation during 80% rMT left DLPFC stimulation. Increased BOLD activity in the left DLPFC was not observed with 40% rMT left DLPFC stimulation nor left M1 80% rMT iTBS, whereas activation in other regions was found to overlap between conditions. Of note, BOLD activation and E-field intensities were only correlated for M1 stimulation, but not for the DLPFC conditions.

Conclusions: The study showed dosage and target specific BOLD activation during interleaved TMS-fMRI with 600 stimuli iTBS in healthy subjects. Future studies may use our approach for demonstrating target engagement.

临床 iTBS 方案的剂量依赖性目标参与:健康受试者的交错 TMS-fMRI 研究。
背景:对背外侧前额叶皮层(DLPFC)的间歇θ脉冲刺激(iTBS)被广泛应用于心理健康的治疗干预,但对其机制的了解仍不全面。之前的磁共振成像研究主要使用离线 iTBS 或同期 TMS-fMRI 的短序列。本研究使用交错 TMS-fMRI 对 600 个刺激的 iTBS 方案进行了研究,并与健康受试者的两种对照条件进行了比较:在交叉设计中,18 名参与者接受了三次交错 iTBS-fMRI 治疗:1)静息运动阈值 (rMT) 强度为 40% 的左侧 DLPFC;2)静息运动阈值 (rMT) 强度为 80% 的左侧 DLPFC;3)静息运动阈值 (rMT) 强度为 80% 的左侧初级运动皮层 (M1)。我们比较了这些条件下交错 iTBS-fMRI 期间的即时血氧水平依赖性(BOLD)反应,包括目标部位的单个 fMRI BOLD 激活与 iTBS 诱导的电场(E-field)强度之间的相关性:结果:全脑分析显示,iTBS 后多个区域的激活增加。具体而言,左侧DLPFC以及双侧M1、前扣带回皮层和岛叶在80% rMT刺激左侧DLPFC时显示出激活增加。在对左侧DLPFC进行40% rMT刺激或对左侧M1进行80% rMT iTBS刺激时,均未观察到左侧DLPFC的BOLD活动增加,而其他区域的激活在不同条件下有重叠。值得注意的是,BOLD 激活和 E 场强度只与 M1 刺激相关,而与 DLPFC 条件无关:该研究显示,在健康受试者中使用 600 个刺激 iTBS 进行交错 TMS-fMRI 时,会出现剂量和目标特异性 BOLD 激活。未来的研究可能会使用我们的方法来证明目标参与。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信