Dose-Dependent Target Engagement of a Clinical Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation Protocol: An Interleaved Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation–Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study in Healthy People
Kai-Yen Chang , Martin Tik , Yuki Mizutani-Tiebel , Paul Taylor , Timo van Hattem , Peter Falkai , Frank Padberg , Lucia Bulubas , Daniel Keeser
{"title":"Dose-Dependent Target Engagement of a Clinical Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation Protocol: An Interleaved Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation–Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study in Healthy People","authors":"Kai-Yen Chang , Martin Tik , Yuki Mizutani-Tiebel , Paul Taylor , Timo van Hattem , Peter Falkai , Frank Padberg , Lucia Bulubas , Daniel Keeser","doi":"10.1016/j.bpsc.2024.08.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) is widely applied as a therapeutic intervention in mental health; however, the understanding of its mechanisms is still incomplete. Prior magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies have mainly used offline iTBS or short sequences in concurrent transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS)–functional MRI (fMRI). This study investigated a full 600-stimuli iTBS protocol using interleaved TMS-fMRI in comparison with 2 control conditions in healthy subjects.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>In a crossover design, 18 participants underwent 3 sessions of interleaved iTBS-fMRI: 1) the left DLPFC at 40% resting motor threshold (rMT) intensity, 2) the left DLPFC at 80% rMT intensity, and 3) the left primary motor cortex (M1) at 80% rMT intensity. We compared immediate blood oxygen level–dependent (BOLD) responses during interleaved iTBS-fMRI across these conditions including correlations between individual fMRI BOLD activation and iTBS-induced electric field strength at the target sites.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Whole-brain analysis showed increased activation in several regions following iTBS. Specifically, the left DLPFC, as well as the bilateral M1, anterior cingulate cortex, and insula, showed increased activation during 80% rMT left DLPFC stimulation. Increased BOLD activity in the left DLPFC was observed with neither 40% rMT left DLPFC stimulation nor left M1 80% rMT iTBS, whereas activation in other regions was found to overlap between conditions. Of note, BOLD activation and electric field intensities were only correlated for M1 stimulation and not for the DLPFC conditions.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This interleaved TMS-fMRI study showed dosage- and target-specific BOLD activation during a 600-stimuli iTBS protocol in healthy individuals. Future studies may use our approach for investigating target engagement in clinical samples.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54231,"journal":{"name":"Biological Psychiatry-Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging","volume":"10 8","pages":"Pages 804-813"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biological Psychiatry-Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2451902224002441","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) is widely applied as a therapeutic intervention in mental health; however, the understanding of its mechanisms is still incomplete. Prior magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies have mainly used offline iTBS or short sequences in concurrent transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS)–functional MRI (fMRI). This study investigated a full 600-stimuli iTBS protocol using interleaved TMS-fMRI in comparison with 2 control conditions in healthy subjects.
Methods
In a crossover design, 18 participants underwent 3 sessions of interleaved iTBS-fMRI: 1) the left DLPFC at 40% resting motor threshold (rMT) intensity, 2) the left DLPFC at 80% rMT intensity, and 3) the left primary motor cortex (M1) at 80% rMT intensity. We compared immediate blood oxygen level–dependent (BOLD) responses during interleaved iTBS-fMRI across these conditions including correlations between individual fMRI BOLD activation and iTBS-induced electric field strength at the target sites.
Results
Whole-brain analysis showed increased activation in several regions following iTBS. Specifically, the left DLPFC, as well as the bilateral M1, anterior cingulate cortex, and insula, showed increased activation during 80% rMT left DLPFC stimulation. Increased BOLD activity in the left DLPFC was observed with neither 40% rMT left DLPFC stimulation nor left M1 80% rMT iTBS, whereas activation in other regions was found to overlap between conditions. Of note, BOLD activation and electric field intensities were only correlated for M1 stimulation and not for the DLPFC conditions.
Conclusions
This interleaved TMS-fMRI study showed dosage- and target-specific BOLD activation during a 600-stimuli iTBS protocol in healthy individuals. Future studies may use our approach for investigating target engagement in clinical samples.
期刊介绍:
Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging is an official journal of the Society for Biological Psychiatry, whose purpose is to promote excellence in scientific research and education in fields that investigate the nature, causes, mechanisms, and treatments of disorders of thought, emotion, or behavior. In accord with this mission, this peer-reviewed, rapid-publication, international journal focuses on studies using the tools and constructs of cognitive neuroscience, including the full range of non-invasive neuroimaging and human extra- and intracranial physiological recording methodologies. It publishes both basic and clinical studies, including those that incorporate genetic data, pharmacological challenges, and computational modeling approaches. The journal publishes novel results of original research which represent an important new lead or significant impact on the field. Reviews and commentaries that focus on topics of current research and interest are also encouraged.