{"title":"Trend and Equity in Maternal and Child Health Resource Allocation in China Since the New Health System Reform: A Nationwide Study from 2008 to 2020.","authors":"Yuanna Zhou, Lin Han, Wuxing Zhang, Yujun Fan, Wenjian Liu, Muzi Liu, Yishan Fan, Xiaoyuan Qu","doi":"10.2147/RMHP.S466680","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>China has made considerable efforts to promote the development of maternal and child health (MCH) care since the new health system reform in 2009. This study aims to evaluate the trend and equity of MCH resources allocation in China from 2008 to 2020 and provide a reference for rational distribution of MCH resources.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were collected from the China Health Statistics Yearbook and China Statistics Yearbook. The number of MCH hospitals, licensed (assistant) physicians, registered nurses and beds were selected for the measurement of the equity of MCH resources allocation. The Health Resource Agglomeration Degree and Theil index were used in evaluating MCH resource allocation equity and to compare differences among regions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 2008 to 2020, the average annual growth rates for MCH hospitals, beds, licensed (assistant) physicians, and registered nurses were 0.72%, 6.95%, 5.04%, and 9.57%, respectively. However, regional disparities in the equity of MCH resource allocation have been identified. Although the western region has shown growth in MCH resource allocation by geography, the agglomeration degree of the four indicators remains less than 1, significantly lower than the average value of greater than 2 in the eastern region. Additionally, the equity of human resource allocation in the western region is lower than the equity in the allocation of institutions. In the densely populated eastern region, the equity of MCH resource allocation by population is decreasing, with the agglomeration degree of all four indicators below 1 in 2020. The disparity in healthcare resource allocation within regions is the main cause of inequitable MCH resource allocation in China.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The allocation of MCH resources in China has improved since 2009, however, geographic equity needs further improvement, particularly in densely populated regions. Population and geographic balances should be considered in the development and implementation of MCH resource allocation policies, and improving intraregional equity should be the focus.</p>","PeriodicalId":56009,"journal":{"name":"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy","volume":"17 ","pages":"1987-2005"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11342946/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S466680","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: China has made considerable efforts to promote the development of maternal and child health (MCH) care since the new health system reform in 2009. This study aims to evaluate the trend and equity of MCH resources allocation in China from 2008 to 2020 and provide a reference for rational distribution of MCH resources.
Methods: Data were collected from the China Health Statistics Yearbook and China Statistics Yearbook. The number of MCH hospitals, licensed (assistant) physicians, registered nurses and beds were selected for the measurement of the equity of MCH resources allocation. The Health Resource Agglomeration Degree and Theil index were used in evaluating MCH resource allocation equity and to compare differences among regions.
Results: From 2008 to 2020, the average annual growth rates for MCH hospitals, beds, licensed (assistant) physicians, and registered nurses were 0.72%, 6.95%, 5.04%, and 9.57%, respectively. However, regional disparities in the equity of MCH resource allocation have been identified. Although the western region has shown growth in MCH resource allocation by geography, the agglomeration degree of the four indicators remains less than 1, significantly lower than the average value of greater than 2 in the eastern region. Additionally, the equity of human resource allocation in the western region is lower than the equity in the allocation of institutions. In the densely populated eastern region, the equity of MCH resource allocation by population is decreasing, with the agglomeration degree of all four indicators below 1 in 2020. The disparity in healthcare resource allocation within regions is the main cause of inequitable MCH resource allocation in China.
Conclusion: The allocation of MCH resources in China has improved since 2009, however, geographic equity needs further improvement, particularly in densely populated regions. Population and geographic balances should be considered in the development and implementation of MCH resource allocation policies, and improving intraregional equity should be the focus.
期刊介绍:
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal focusing on all aspects of public health, policy and preventative measures to promote good health and improve morbidity and mortality in the population. Specific topics covered in the journal include:
Public and community health
Policy and law
Preventative and predictive healthcare
Risk and hazard management
Epidemiology, detection and screening
Lifestyle and diet modification
Vaccination and disease transmission/modification programs
Health and safety and occupational health
Healthcare services provision
Health literacy and education
Advertising and promotion of health issues
Health economic evaluations and resource management
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy focuses on human interventional and observational research. The journal welcomes submitted papers covering original research, clinical and epidemiological studies, reviews and evaluations, guidelines, expert opinion and commentary, and extended reports. Case reports will only be considered if they make a valuable and original contribution to the literature. The journal does not accept study protocols, animal-based or cell line-based studies.