Impact of Previous Surgery and/or Radiation Therapy on Endoscopic Reconstruction Outcomes.

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Rita Snyder, Franco Rubino, Scott Seaman, Matei Banu, Shirley Y Su, Ehab Y Hanna, Franco DeMonte, Shaan M Raza
{"title":"Impact of Previous Surgery and/or Radiation Therapy on Endoscopic Reconstruction Outcomes.","authors":"Rita Snyder, Franco Rubino, Scott Seaman, Matei Banu, Shirley Y Su, Ehab Y Hanna, Franco DeMonte, Shaan M Raza","doi":"10.1227/ons.0000000000001318","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>The impact of prior local therapies, including radiation and surgery, on reconstruction outcomes after endonasal surgery is currently not well known. Reconstruction nuances in the preoperative setting merit further evaluation to avoid potential postoperative complications that can hinder overall tumor management and negatively impact patient outcome. We sought to determine whether prior treatments increase risk of reconstruction-related postoperative morbidity and to evaluate the effectiveness of our current treatment paradigm for skull base reconstruction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review of all endonasal surgeries for tumor resection between March 2000 and March 2022 was performed. Patients were grouped based on treatment history. Patient demographics, operative, and postoperative reconstruction-related morbidity data were collected, including cerebrospinal fluid leak, sinonasal morbidity, and infectious complications. Variables significantly associated with postoperative complications in the univariate analysis were included in the multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression model. Complication-free survival curves were generated, and the log-rank test evaluated the relationship between complication-free survival and the different clinical, surgical, and treatment parameters. All statistical analyses were performed with SPSS 26 (IBM Corp) and Graph Pad 9.0 (GraphPad Software).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 418 patients were included. 291 patients had no prior treatments, 49 patients had previously received radiation, and 78 patients had prior surgeries. Of the 49 patients who had prior radiation, 27% underwent reconstruction with tunneled pericranial flaps vs 16% of treatment-naïve patients. On multivariate analysis, prior treatment was not significantly associated with reconstruction-related complications. Negative smoking history, no leak or small intraoperative leak, and use of vascularized flap in reconstruction were protective factors.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In patients undergoing endonasal surgery, prior radiation and/or surgery does not appear to significantly increase the risk of immediate or delayed reconstruction complications using our current reconstructive management plan, which incorporates an upfront regional flap for high-risk cases.</p>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1227/ons.0000000000001318","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: The impact of prior local therapies, including radiation and surgery, on reconstruction outcomes after endonasal surgery is currently not well known. Reconstruction nuances in the preoperative setting merit further evaluation to avoid potential postoperative complications that can hinder overall tumor management and negatively impact patient outcome. We sought to determine whether prior treatments increase risk of reconstruction-related postoperative morbidity and to evaluate the effectiveness of our current treatment paradigm for skull base reconstruction.

Methods: A retrospective review of all endonasal surgeries for tumor resection between March 2000 and March 2022 was performed. Patients were grouped based on treatment history. Patient demographics, operative, and postoperative reconstruction-related morbidity data were collected, including cerebrospinal fluid leak, sinonasal morbidity, and infectious complications. Variables significantly associated with postoperative complications in the univariate analysis were included in the multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression model. Complication-free survival curves were generated, and the log-rank test evaluated the relationship between complication-free survival and the different clinical, surgical, and treatment parameters. All statistical analyses were performed with SPSS 26 (IBM Corp) and Graph Pad 9.0 (GraphPad Software).

Results: A total of 418 patients were included. 291 patients had no prior treatments, 49 patients had previously received radiation, and 78 patients had prior surgeries. Of the 49 patients who had prior radiation, 27% underwent reconstruction with tunneled pericranial flaps vs 16% of treatment-naïve patients. On multivariate analysis, prior treatment was not significantly associated with reconstruction-related complications. Negative smoking history, no leak or small intraoperative leak, and use of vascularized flap in reconstruction were protective factors.

Conclusion: In patients undergoing endonasal surgery, prior radiation and/or surgery does not appear to significantly increase the risk of immediate or delayed reconstruction complications using our current reconstructive management plan, which incorporates an upfront regional flap for high-risk cases.

既往手术和/或放射治疗对内窥镜重建结果的影响
背景和目的:目前还不太清楚之前的局部治疗(包括放疗和手术)对鼻内手术后重建结果的影响。术前重建的细微差别值得进一步评估,以避免潜在的术后并发症,这些并发症会妨碍整体肿瘤管理并对患者预后产生负面影响。我们试图确定之前的治疗是否会增加重建相关术后发病率的风险,并评估我们目前的颅底重建治疗模式的有效性:方法:我们对 2000 年 3 月至 2022 年 3 月间所有鼻内肿瘤切除手术进行了回顾性分析。根据治疗史对患者进行分组。收集了患者的人口统计学、手术和术后重建相关的发病率数据,包括脑脊液漏、鼻窦发病率和感染性并发症。在单变量分析中与术后并发症明显相关的变量被纳入多变量 Cox 比例危险度回归模型。生成无并发症生存率曲线,并用对数秩检验评估无并发症生存率与不同临床、手术和治疗参数之间的关系。所有统计分析均使用 SPSS 26 (IBM Corp) 和 Graph Pad 9.0 (GraphPad Software) 进行:结果:共纳入 418 例患者。291 名患者之前未接受过治疗,49 名患者之前接受过放射治疗,78 名患者之前接受过手术治疗。在 49 名曾接受过放射治疗的患者中,27% 的患者接受了隧道式颅周皮瓣重建术,而 16% 的患者未接受过治疗。经多变量分析,既往治疗与重建相关并发症无明显关联。无吸烟史、无渗漏或术中渗漏较小以及在重建中使用血管化皮瓣是保护因素:结论:对于接受鼻内镜手术的患者,采用我们目前的重建管理方案,即在高风险病例中使用前期区域皮瓣,之前的放射治疗和/或手术似乎不会显著增加即刻或延迟重建并发症的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信