Evaluation of the safety of medication-use systems in hospital emergency services.

IF 1 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
María José Otero, Montserrat Alonso Díez, Helena Esteban Cartelle, Sonia Jiménez Hernández, Iria Miguéns Blanco, Marisol Samartín Ucha, Rosario Santolaya Perrín, Jesús Ruiz Ramos
{"title":"Evaluation of the safety of medication-use systems in hospital emergency services.","authors":"María José Otero, Montserrat Alonso Díez, Helena Esteban Cartelle, Sonia Jiménez Hernández, Iria Miguéns Blanco, Marisol Samartín Ucha, Rosario Santolaya Perrín, Jesús Ruiz Ramos","doi":"10.1016/j.farma.2024.07.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The aim of this study was to assess the implementation of safe medication practices in hospital emergency services, in order to understand the points of greatest risk as well as the safety challenges faced by these departments, and to plan collaboratively improvement initiatives.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Multicentric and descriptive study based on completion of the \"Medication safety self-assessment of emergency services\" from 5/16/2023 to 11/16/2023, at voluntarily participating emergency services. The survey contained 93 items grouped into 10 key elements. Mean score and mean percentages based on the maximum possible values for the overall survey, for the key elements and for each individual item of evaluation, were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 72 emergency services completed the questionnaire. The mean score obtained for the overall questionnaire was 428.3 points (51.1% of the maximum score). Results showed a large variation among the scores of the participating services (range: 164-620.5). Four key elements had values below 50%, corresponding to competence and training of professionals in safety practices (38.4%); incorporation of pharmacists in emergency departments (42.1%), availability and accessibility of information about patients (43.1%), and patient education (48.1%). The highest values corresponded to labeling, packaging, and naming of medications (69.2%) and communication of prescriptions and other medication information (64%). No differences were found between emergency services in the key elements according to the dependency or size of the hospital, or the type of service, except for the item referring to the incorporation of pharmacists in the emergency service, where differences were observed between hospitals with less than 200 beds (28.9%) and those with more than 500 (52.2%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The application of the specific self-assessment questionnaire has made it possible to identify safety practices that are insufficiently implemented into emergency services in our country and to identify critical points for improvement for which planning collaborative initiatives to reduce medication errors in these departments should become a priority.</p>","PeriodicalId":45860,"journal":{"name":"FARMACIA HOSPITALARIA","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"FARMACIA HOSPITALARIA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.farma.2024.07.007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The aim of this study was to assess the implementation of safe medication practices in hospital emergency services, in order to understand the points of greatest risk as well as the safety challenges faced by these departments, and to plan collaboratively improvement initiatives.

Method: Multicentric and descriptive study based on completion of the "Medication safety self-assessment of emergency services" from 5/16/2023 to 11/16/2023, at voluntarily participating emergency services. The survey contained 93 items grouped into 10 key elements. Mean score and mean percentages based on the maximum possible values for the overall survey, for the key elements and for each individual item of evaluation, were assessed.

Results: A total of 72 emergency services completed the questionnaire. The mean score obtained for the overall questionnaire was 428.3 points (51.1% of the maximum score). Results showed a large variation among the scores of the participating services (range: 164-620.5). Four key elements had values below 50%, corresponding to competence and training of professionals in safety practices (38.4%); incorporation of pharmacists in emergency departments (42.1%), availability and accessibility of information about patients (43.1%), and patient education (48.1%). The highest values corresponded to labeling, packaging, and naming of medications (69.2%) and communication of prescriptions and other medication information (64%). No differences were found between emergency services in the key elements according to the dependency or size of the hospital, or the type of service, except for the item referring to the incorporation of pharmacists in the emergency service, where differences were observed between hospitals with less than 200 beds (28.9%) and those with more than 500 (52.2%).

Conclusion: The application of the specific self-assessment questionnaire has made it possible to identify safety practices that are insufficiently implemented into emergency services in our country and to identify critical points for improvement for which planning collaborative initiatives to reduce medication errors in these departments should become a priority.

评估医院急诊服务中药物使用系统的安全性。
导言:本研究旨在评估医院急诊部门安全用药实践的实施情况,以了解这些部门面临的最大风险点和安全挑战,并共同计划改进措施:多中心和描述性研究,基于自愿参与的急诊部门在 2023 年 5 月 16 日至 2023 年 11 月 16 日期间完成的 "急诊部门用药安全自我评估"。调查包含 93 个项目,分为 10 个关键要素。根据整个调查、关键要素和每个评估项目的最大可能值,评估了平均得分和平均百分比:共有 72 家急救服务机构完成了问卷调查。整个问卷的平均得分为 428.3 分(占最高分的 51.1%)。结果显示,参与调查的服务机构得分差异较大(范围:164-620.5 分)。有四项关键要素的得分低于 50%,分别是专业人员在安全操作方面的能力和培训(38.4%)、急诊科配备药剂师(42.1%)、患者信息的提供和获取(43.1%)以及患者教育(48.1%)。药品标签、包装和命名(69.2%)以及处方和其他用药信息沟通(64%)的数值最高。根据医院的依存度、规模或服务类型,各急诊服务机构在关键要素方面没有发现差异,但在急诊服务机构配备药剂师这一项上,200 张床位以下的医院(28.9%)和 500 张床位以上的医院(52.2%)之间存在差异:通过采用特定的自我评估问卷,可以发现我国急诊服务中未充分实施的安全措施,并找出需要改进的关键点,从而优先规划合作措施,减少这些部门的用药错误。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
FARMACIA HOSPITALARIA
FARMACIA HOSPITALARIA PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
21.40%
发文量
46
审稿时长
37 days
期刊介绍: Una gran revista para acceder a los mejores artículos originales y revisiones de la farmacoterapia actual. Además, es Órgano de expresión científica de la Sociedad Española de Farmacia Hospitalaria, y está indexada en Index Medicus/Medline, EMBASE/Excerpta Médica, Alert, Internacional Pharmaceutical Abstracts y SCOPUS.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信