[Reasons and strategies of reoperation after oblique lateral interbody fusion].

Q4 Medicine
Zhong-You Zeng, Deng-Wei He, Wen-Fei Ni, Ping-Quan Chen, Wei Yu, Yong-Xing Song, Hong-Fei Wu, Shi-Yang Fan, Guo-Hao Song, Hai-Feng Wang, Fei Pei
{"title":"[Reasons and strategies of reoperation after oblique lateral interbody fusion].","authors":"Zhong-You Zeng, Deng-Wei He, Wen-Fei Ni, Ping-Quan Chen, Wei Yu, Yong-Xing Song, Hong-Fei Wu, Shi-Yang Fan, Guo-Hao Song, Hai-Feng Wang, Fei Pei","doi":"10.12200/j.issn.1003-0034.20230338","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To summarize the reasons and management strategies of reoperation after oblique lateral interbody fusion (OLIF), and put forward preventive measures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From October 2015 to December 2019, 23 patients who underwent reoperation after OLIF in four spine surgery centers were retrospectively analyzed. There were 9 males and 14 females with an average age of (61.89±8.80) years old ranging from 44 to 81 years old. The index diagnosis was degenerative lumbar intervertebral dics diseases in 3 cases, discogenic low back pain in 1 case, degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis in 6 cases, lumbar spinal stenosis in 9 cases and degenerative lumbar spinal kyphoscoliosis in 4 cases. Sixteen patients were primarily treated with Stand-alone OLIF procedures and 7 cases were primarily treated with OLIF combined with posterior pedicle screw fixation. There were 17 cases of single fusion segment, 2 of 2 fusion segments, 4 of 3 fusion segments. All the cases underwent reoperation within 3 months after the initial surgery. The strategies of reoperation included supplementary posterior pedicle screw instrumentation in 16 cases;posterior laminectomy, cage adjustment and neurolysis in 2 cases, arthroplasty and neurolysis under endoscope in 1 case, posterior laminectomy and neurolysis in 1 case, pedicle screw adjustment in 1 case, exploration and decompression under percutaneous endoscopic in 1 case, interbody fusion cage and pedicle screw revision in 1 case. Visual analogue scale (VAS) and Oswestry disability index (ODI) index were used to evaluate and compare the recovery of low back pain and lumbar function before reoperation and at the last follow-up. During the follow-up process, the phenomenon of fusion cage settlement or re-displacement, as well as the condition of intervertebral fusion, were observed. The changes in intervertebral space height before the first operation, after the first operation, before the second operation, 3 to 5 days after the second operation, 6 months after the second operation, and at the latest follow-up were measured and compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no skin necrosis and infection. All patients were followed up from 12 to 48 months with an average of (28.1±7.3) months. Nerve root injury symptoms were relieved within 3 to 6 months. No cage transverse shifting and no dislodgement, loosening or breakage of the instrumentation was observed in any patient during the follow-up period. Though the intervertebral disc height was obviously increased at the first postoperative, there was a rapid loss in the early stage, and still partially lost after reoperation. The VAS for back pain recovered from (6.20±1.69) points preoperatively to (1.60±0.71) points postoperatively(<i>P</i><0.05). The ODI recovered from (40.60±7.01)% preoperatively to (9.14±2.66)% postoperatively(<i>P</i><0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There is a risk of reoperation due to failure after OLIF surgery. The reasons for reoperation include preoperative bone loss or osteoporosis the initial surgery was performed by Stand-alone, intraoperative endplate injury, significant subsidence of the fusion cage after surgery, postoperative fusion cage displacement, nerve damage, etc. As long as it is discovered in a timely manner and handled properly, further surgery after OLIF surgery can achieve better clinical results, but prevention still needs to be strengthened.</p>","PeriodicalId":23964,"journal":{"name":"Zhongguo gu shang = China journal of orthopaedics and traumatology","volume":"37 8","pages":"756-64"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zhongguo gu shang = China journal of orthopaedics and traumatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12200/j.issn.1003-0034.20230338","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To summarize the reasons and management strategies of reoperation after oblique lateral interbody fusion (OLIF), and put forward preventive measures.

Methods: From October 2015 to December 2019, 23 patients who underwent reoperation after OLIF in four spine surgery centers were retrospectively analyzed. There were 9 males and 14 females with an average age of (61.89±8.80) years old ranging from 44 to 81 years old. The index diagnosis was degenerative lumbar intervertebral dics diseases in 3 cases, discogenic low back pain in 1 case, degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis in 6 cases, lumbar spinal stenosis in 9 cases and degenerative lumbar spinal kyphoscoliosis in 4 cases. Sixteen patients were primarily treated with Stand-alone OLIF procedures and 7 cases were primarily treated with OLIF combined with posterior pedicle screw fixation. There were 17 cases of single fusion segment, 2 of 2 fusion segments, 4 of 3 fusion segments. All the cases underwent reoperation within 3 months after the initial surgery. The strategies of reoperation included supplementary posterior pedicle screw instrumentation in 16 cases;posterior laminectomy, cage adjustment and neurolysis in 2 cases, arthroplasty and neurolysis under endoscope in 1 case, posterior laminectomy and neurolysis in 1 case, pedicle screw adjustment in 1 case, exploration and decompression under percutaneous endoscopic in 1 case, interbody fusion cage and pedicle screw revision in 1 case. Visual analogue scale (VAS) and Oswestry disability index (ODI) index were used to evaluate and compare the recovery of low back pain and lumbar function before reoperation and at the last follow-up. During the follow-up process, the phenomenon of fusion cage settlement or re-displacement, as well as the condition of intervertebral fusion, were observed. The changes in intervertebral space height before the first operation, after the first operation, before the second operation, 3 to 5 days after the second operation, 6 months after the second operation, and at the latest follow-up were measured and compared.

Results: There was no skin necrosis and infection. All patients were followed up from 12 to 48 months with an average of (28.1±7.3) months. Nerve root injury symptoms were relieved within 3 to 6 months. No cage transverse shifting and no dislodgement, loosening or breakage of the instrumentation was observed in any patient during the follow-up period. Though the intervertebral disc height was obviously increased at the first postoperative, there was a rapid loss in the early stage, and still partially lost after reoperation. The VAS for back pain recovered from (6.20±1.69) points preoperatively to (1.60±0.71) points postoperatively(P<0.05). The ODI recovered from (40.60±7.01)% preoperatively to (9.14±2.66)% postoperatively(P<0.05).

Conclusion: There is a risk of reoperation due to failure after OLIF surgery. The reasons for reoperation include preoperative bone loss or osteoporosis the initial surgery was performed by Stand-alone, intraoperative endplate injury, significant subsidence of the fusion cage after surgery, postoperative fusion cage displacement, nerve damage, etc. As long as it is discovered in a timely manner and handled properly, further surgery after OLIF surgery can achieve better clinical results, but prevention still needs to be strengthened.

[斜侧椎体间融合术后再次手术的原因和策略]。
摘要总结斜外侧椎间融合术(OLIF)术后再次手术的原因及处理策略,并提出预防措施:回顾性分析2015年10月至2019年12月在4家脊柱外科中心接受OLIF术后再次手术的23例患者。其中男性9例,女性14例,平均年龄(61.89±8.80)岁,年龄在44岁至81岁之间。诊断指标为退行性腰椎间盘突出症3例,椎间盘源性腰痛1例,退行性腰椎滑脱症6例,腰椎管狭窄症9例,退行性腰椎脊柱侧弯症4例。16例患者主要采用独立的OLIF手术治疗,7例患者主要采用OLIF联合后路椎弓根螺钉固定术治疗。17例为单节段融合,2例为2节段融合,4例为3节段融合。所有病例均在初次手术后 3 个月内接受了再次手术。再次手术的策略包括:16例补充后路椎弓根螺钉器械;2例后路椎板切除术、椎笼调整和神经切除术;1例内窥镜下关节成形术和神经切除术;1例后路椎板切除术和神经切除术;1例椎弓根螺钉调整;1例经皮内窥镜下探查和减压;1例椎间融合椎笼和椎弓根螺钉翻修。采用视觉模拟量表(VAS)和Oswestry残疾指数(ODI)评估和比较再次手术前和最后一次随访时腰痛和腰椎功能的恢复情况。在随访过程中,观察融合骨架的沉降或再移位现象以及椎间融合情况。测量并比较第一次手术前、第一次手术后、第二次手术前、第二次手术后 3 至 5 天、第二次手术后 6 个月以及最近一次随访时椎间隙高度的变化:结果:无皮肤坏死和感染。所有患者均接受了 12 至 48 个月的随访,平均随访时间为(28.1±7.3)个月。神经根损伤症状在3至6个月内得到缓解。在随访期间,所有患者均未发现椎笼横向移位、器械脱落、松动或断裂。虽然椎间盘高度在术后初期明显增加,但在早期迅速下降,再次手术后仍有部分下降。背部疼痛的 VAS 从术前的(6.20±1.69)分恢复到术后的(1.60±0.71)分(PPConclusion:OLIF手术后存在因失败而再次手术的风险。再次手术的原因包括术前骨质流失或骨质疏松症、初次手术为独立手术、术中终板损伤、术后融合骨架明显下沉、术后融合骨架移位、神经损伤等。只要发现及时,处理得当,OLIF术后再次手术可以取得较好的临床效果,但仍需加强预防。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
189
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信