{"title":"Utility of special AT-rich sequence-binding protein 2 (SATB2) immunohistochemistry as a marker for secondary perianal paget disease.","authors":"Krithika Shenoy, Kathleen Byrnes","doi":"10.1007/s00428-024-03906-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A panel-based approach using immunohistochemistry (IHC) is currently used for subtyping perianal Paget disease (PPD) in the absence of a synchronous neoplasm. Special AT-rich Sequence Binding Protein 2 (SATB2) has been established as a sensitive and specific marker for lower gastrointestinal tract carcinomas. We evaluated its performance as a marker of secondary PPD. A panel of IHCs including CK7, CK20, GCDFP-15, CDX2, and SATB2 were performed on fifteen cases of PPD (identified between 1991-2001) and seven cases of primary vulvar Paget disease with perianal involvement. Eight cases (53%) were classified as secondary PPD based on the presence of a synchronous (n = 7) or a metachronous neoplasm (n = 1). There was no differential staining for CK7 (positive in 7/7 primary vs. 7/8 secondary PPD; P = 1.00) and CK20 (positive in 4/7 primary vs. 8/8 secondary PPD; P = .08). GCDFP-15 was positive in 5/7 cases of primary PPD while negative in all cases of secondary PPD (P = .01). CDX2 was positive in all cases of secondary PPD (P = .001) while SATB2 was positive in 7/8 cases of secondary PPD (P = .01). Both CDX2 and SATB2 were positive in 1/7 cases of primary PPD. The addition of an IHC panel in conjunction with clinical/imaging findings can help definitively classify PPD as either primary or secondary in most cases. We show that SATB2 has comparable performance to CDX2 and can be a helpful additional tool.</p>","PeriodicalId":23514,"journal":{"name":"Virchows Archiv","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Virchows Archiv","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-024-03906-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
A panel-based approach using immunohistochemistry (IHC) is currently used for subtyping perianal Paget disease (PPD) in the absence of a synchronous neoplasm. Special AT-rich Sequence Binding Protein 2 (SATB2) has been established as a sensitive and specific marker for lower gastrointestinal tract carcinomas. We evaluated its performance as a marker of secondary PPD. A panel of IHCs including CK7, CK20, GCDFP-15, CDX2, and SATB2 were performed on fifteen cases of PPD (identified between 1991-2001) and seven cases of primary vulvar Paget disease with perianal involvement. Eight cases (53%) were classified as secondary PPD based on the presence of a synchronous (n = 7) or a metachronous neoplasm (n = 1). There was no differential staining for CK7 (positive in 7/7 primary vs. 7/8 secondary PPD; P = 1.00) and CK20 (positive in 4/7 primary vs. 8/8 secondary PPD; P = .08). GCDFP-15 was positive in 5/7 cases of primary PPD while negative in all cases of secondary PPD (P = .01). CDX2 was positive in all cases of secondary PPD (P = .001) while SATB2 was positive in 7/8 cases of secondary PPD (P = .01). Both CDX2 and SATB2 were positive in 1/7 cases of primary PPD. The addition of an IHC panel in conjunction with clinical/imaging findings can help definitively classify PPD as either primary or secondary in most cases. We show that SATB2 has comparable performance to CDX2 and can be a helpful additional tool.
期刊介绍:
Manuscripts of original studies reinforcing the evidence base of modern diagnostic pathology, using immunocytochemical, molecular and ultrastructural techniques, will be welcomed. In addition, papers on critical evaluation of diagnostic criteria but also broadsheets and guidelines with a solid evidence base will be considered. Consideration will also be given to reports of work in other fields relevant to the understanding of human pathology as well as manuscripts on the application of new methods and techniques in pathology. Submission of purely experimental articles is discouraged but manuscripts on experimental work applicable to diagnostic pathology are welcomed. Biomarker studies are welcomed but need to abide by strict rules (e.g. REMARK) of adequate sample size and relevant marker choice. Single marker studies on limited patient series without validated application will as a rule not be considered. Case reports will only be considered when they provide substantial new information with an impact on understanding disease or diagnostic practice.