Access to Care and Health-Related Quality of Life in Multiple Sclerosis.

IF 2.3 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Neurology. Clinical practice Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-16 DOI:10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200338
Ruth Ann Marrie, Samantha Lancia, Gary R Cutter, Robert J Fox, Amber Salter
{"title":"Access to Care and Health-Related Quality of Life in Multiple Sclerosis.","authors":"Ruth Ann Marrie, Samantha Lancia, Gary R Cutter, Robert J Fox, Amber Salter","doi":"10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200338","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Despite their high health care use, it is unclear whether the health care needs of people with MS are being met and what their priorities are. We assessed priorities for access to, and affordability of care, by people living with MS in the United States. We also tested the association between perceived inadequate access to care and health-related quality of life (HRQoL).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In Fall 2022, we conducted a cross-sectional survey of participants in the North American Research Committee on Multiple Sclerosis Registry about access to care and HRQoL (Health Utilities Index Mark III). We used multivariable polytomous logistic regression to test sociodemographic and clinical factors associated with access to care. We used multivariable linear regression analysis to test the association between access to care and HRQoL.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 4,914 respondents in the analysis, of whom 3,974 (80.9%) were women, with a mean (SD) age 64.4 (9.9) years. The providers who were most reported as needed but inaccessible were complementary providers (35.5%), followed by allied health providers (24.2%), occupational therapists (22.7%), and mental health providers (20.7%). Over 80% of participants reported that it was important or very important to be able to get an appointment with their primary MS health care provider when needed, to have sufficient time in their appointments to explain their concerns, to see their neurologist if their status changed, and that their health care providers communicated to coordinate their care. Participants who reported needing to see the provider but not having access or seeing the provider but would like to see them more often had lower HRQOL (ranging from -0.059 to -0.176) than participants who saw the provider as much as needed.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Gaps in access to care persist for people with MS in the United States and substantially affect HRQoL. Improving access to care for people with MS should be a health system priority.</p>","PeriodicalId":19136,"journal":{"name":"Neurology. Clinical practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11341006/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurology. Clinical practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200338","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: Despite their high health care use, it is unclear whether the health care needs of people with MS are being met and what their priorities are. We assessed priorities for access to, and affordability of care, by people living with MS in the United States. We also tested the association between perceived inadequate access to care and health-related quality of life (HRQoL).

Methods: In Fall 2022, we conducted a cross-sectional survey of participants in the North American Research Committee on Multiple Sclerosis Registry about access to care and HRQoL (Health Utilities Index Mark III). We used multivariable polytomous logistic regression to test sociodemographic and clinical factors associated with access to care. We used multivariable linear regression analysis to test the association between access to care and HRQoL.

Results: We included 4,914 respondents in the analysis, of whom 3,974 (80.9%) were women, with a mean (SD) age 64.4 (9.9) years. The providers who were most reported as needed but inaccessible were complementary providers (35.5%), followed by allied health providers (24.2%), occupational therapists (22.7%), and mental health providers (20.7%). Over 80% of participants reported that it was important or very important to be able to get an appointment with their primary MS health care provider when needed, to have sufficient time in their appointments to explain their concerns, to see their neurologist if their status changed, and that their health care providers communicated to coordinate their care. Participants who reported needing to see the provider but not having access or seeing the provider but would like to see them more often had lower HRQOL (ranging from -0.059 to -0.176) than participants who saw the provider as much as needed.

Discussion: Gaps in access to care persist for people with MS in the United States and substantially affect HRQoL. Improving access to care for people with MS should be a health system priority.

多发性硬化症患者获得护理的机会和与健康相关的生活质量。
背景和目的:尽管多发性硬化症患者的医疗保健使用率很高,但他们的医疗保健需求是否得到满足以及他们的优先考虑事项是什么尚不清楚。我们评估了美国多发性硬化症患者获得医疗服务的优先顺序以及医疗服务的可负担性。我们还测试了感知到的医疗服务不足与健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)之间的关联:2022 年秋季,我们对北美多发性硬化症研究委员会登记处的参与者进行了一项横断面调查,内容涉及医疗服务的可及性和 HRQoL(健康效用指数 Mark III)。我们使用多变量多项式逻辑回归来检验与就医相关的社会人口学和临床因素。我们使用多变量线性回归分析来检验获得医疗服务与 HRQoL 之间的关联:我们在分析中纳入了 4,914 名受访者,其中 3,974 人(80.9%)为女性,平均(标清)年龄为 64.4(9.9)岁。据报告,最需要但无法获得的医疗服务提供者是辅助医疗服务提供者(35.5%),其次是专职医疗服务提供者(24.2%)、职业治疗师(22.7%)和心理健康服务提供者(20.7%)。超过 80% 的参与者表示,在需要时能够与他们的主要多发性硬化症医疗服务提供者预约、在预约时有足够的时间解释他们的担忧、在他们的状况发生变化时能够见到他们的神经科医生,以及他们的医疗服务提供者能够沟通协调他们的医疗服务,这些都很重要或非常重要。那些表示需要看医疗服务提供者但无法获得医疗服务或希望更经常看医疗服务提供者的参与者的 HRQOL(从-0.059 到-0.176 不等)低于那些根据需要经常看医疗服务提供者的参与者:讨论:在美国,多发性硬化症患者在获得医疗服务方面仍然存在差距,这严重影响了患者的 HRQoL。改善多发性硬化症患者获得医疗服务的机会应成为卫生系统的当务之急。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neurology. Clinical practice
Neurology. Clinical practice CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
77
期刊介绍: Neurology® Genetics is an online open access journal publishing peer-reviewed reports in the field of neurogenetics. The journal publishes original articles in all areas of neurogenetics including rare and common genetic variations, genotype-phenotype correlations, outlier phenotypes as a result of mutations in known disease genes, and genetic variations with a putative link to diseases. Articles include studies reporting on genetic disease risk, pharmacogenomics, and results of gene-based clinical trials (viral, ASO, etc.). Genetically engineered model systems are not a primary focus of Neurology® Genetics, but studies using model systems for treatment trials, including well-powered studies reporting negative results, are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信