Ethical assessment of genome resource banking (GRB) in wildlife conservation

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
Pierfrancesco Biasetti , Elena Mercugliano , Lisa Schrade , Maria Michela Spiriti , Frank Göritz , Susanne Holtze , Steven Seet , Cesare Galli , Jan Stejskal , Silvia Colleoni , Daniel Čižmár , Raffaella Simone , Thomas B. Hildebrandt , Barbara de Mori
{"title":"Ethical assessment of genome resource banking (GRB) in wildlife conservation","authors":"Pierfrancesco Biasetti ,&nbsp;Elena Mercugliano ,&nbsp;Lisa Schrade ,&nbsp;Maria Michela Spiriti ,&nbsp;Frank Göritz ,&nbsp;Susanne Holtze ,&nbsp;Steven Seet ,&nbsp;Cesare Galli ,&nbsp;Jan Stejskal ,&nbsp;Silvia Colleoni ,&nbsp;Daniel Čižmár ,&nbsp;Raffaella Simone ,&nbsp;Thomas B. Hildebrandt ,&nbsp;Barbara de Mori","doi":"10.1016/j.cryobiol.2024.104956","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Genome Resources Banks (GRBs) represent vital repositories for the systematic collection, storage, and management of genetic material across various taxa, with a primary objective of safeguarding genetic diversity for research and practical applications. Alongside the development of assisted reproductive techniques (ART), GRBs have evolved into indispensable tools in conservation, offering opportunities for species preservation, mitigating inbreeding risks, and facilitating genetic management across fragmented populations. By preserving genetic information in a suspended state, GRBs serve as backups against population vulnerabilities, potentially aiding in the restoration of endangered species and extending their genetic lifespan. While evidence demonstrates the efficacy of GRBs, ethical considerations surrounding biobanking procedures for wildlife conservation remain largely unexplored. In this article, we will discuss possible ethical issues related to GRBs and the need to ethically monitor biobanking procedures in wildlife conservation. We will then propose a methodological tool, ETHAS, already in use for the ethical self-assessment of assisted reproduction techniques, to assess also biobanking procedures. ETHAS can make it possible to monitor a GRB from its design phase to its actual operation, helping to build biobanking procedures that meet high ethical standards.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0011224024001111/pdfft?md5=443b13411a5e13c20c77748221cd2d9d&pid=1-s2.0-S0011224024001111-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0011224024001111","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Genome Resources Banks (GRBs) represent vital repositories for the systematic collection, storage, and management of genetic material across various taxa, with a primary objective of safeguarding genetic diversity for research and practical applications. Alongside the development of assisted reproductive techniques (ART), GRBs have evolved into indispensable tools in conservation, offering opportunities for species preservation, mitigating inbreeding risks, and facilitating genetic management across fragmented populations. By preserving genetic information in a suspended state, GRBs serve as backups against population vulnerabilities, potentially aiding in the restoration of endangered species and extending their genetic lifespan. While evidence demonstrates the efficacy of GRBs, ethical considerations surrounding biobanking procedures for wildlife conservation remain largely unexplored. In this article, we will discuss possible ethical issues related to GRBs and the need to ethically monitor biobanking procedures in wildlife conservation. We will then propose a methodological tool, ETHAS, already in use for the ethical self-assessment of assisted reproduction techniques, to assess also biobanking procedures. ETHAS can make it possible to monitor a GRB from its design phase to its actual operation, helping to build biobanking procedures that meet high ethical standards.

Abstract Image

野生动物保护中基因组资源库(GRB)的伦理评估。
基因组资源库(GRBs)是系统收集、储存和管理不同类群遗传物质的重要资源库,其主要目的是保护遗传多样性,以供研究和实际应用。随着辅助生殖技术(ART)的发展,遗传资源库已逐渐成为物种保护不可或缺的工具,为物种保护、降低近亲繁殖风险和促进分散种群的遗传管理提供了机会。通过在悬浮状态下保存遗传信息,遗传资源库可作为种群脆弱性的备份,从而有可能帮助恢复濒危物种并延长其遗传寿命。虽然有证据显示了基因库的功效,但围绕野生动物保护生物库程序的伦理考虑在很大程度上仍未得到探讨。在本文中,我们将讨论与遗传资源库相关的可能伦理问题,以及在野生动物保护中对生物库程序进行伦理监控的必要性。然后,我们将提出一种方法工具--ETHAS,该工具已用于辅助生殖技术的伦理自我评估,也可用于评估生物银行程序。ETHAS 可以对遗传资源库从设计阶段到实际操作的全过程进行监控,帮助建立符合高道德标准的生物库程序。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信