Striving for excellence: multicentre quality improvement project to optimize CT KUB technique in renal colic patients.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Aasma Nudrat Zafar, Hamza Rehman, Khalid Shakeel Babar, Humaira Anjum, Iqra Saeed, Nasrullah Yaqoob, Farzana Rahim, Ijaz Ahmed, Mahjabeen Mehmood Kamal, Naila Usmani, Ayesha Sharif Khan, Saerah Iffat Zafar, Maaz Khan, Ihsan Ali, Shumaila Arooj, Mehwish Zahra Alavi, Amber Goraya, Nazish Irfan, Muhammad Awais, Uzma Azmat
{"title":"Striving for excellence: multicentre quality improvement project to optimize CT KUB technique in renal colic patients.","authors":"Aasma Nudrat Zafar, Hamza Rehman, Khalid Shakeel Babar, Humaira Anjum, Iqra Saeed, Nasrullah Yaqoob, Farzana Rahim, Ijaz Ahmed, Mahjabeen Mehmood Kamal, Naila Usmani, Ayesha Sharif Khan, Saerah Iffat Zafar, Maaz Khan, Ihsan Ali, Shumaila Arooj, Mehwish Zahra Alavi, Amber Goraya, Nazish Irfan, Muhammad Awais, Uzma Azmat","doi":"10.1093/bjr/tqae172","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To perform audit of imaging practice in different hospitals to assess their adherence to guidelines on optimizing computerized tomography of kidneys, ureter, and bladder (CT KUB) technique in order to reduce unnecessary scan length. To assess improvement in adherence to guidelines after intervention, following education of the technologists.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>There were 12 participant radiology departments in 8 cities of Islamic Republic of Pakistan. Findings of first audit round were presented in respective departmental meetings, and technologists were educated. Second round was performed after 12 weeks. Our target was to achieve 100% compliance to standards. Comparison of adherence to guidelines before and after intervention was done. Total number of axial slices of KUB CT scan, images above upper pole of highest kidney (overscan/unnecessary slices), and percentage of unnecessary images were recorded. To calculate statistical significance of difference, Fischer exact and Chi-square tests were applied.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Percentage of patients with appropriate CT KUB technique according to RCR guidelines was far less in first round (0%-64%). It significantly improved after educating the technologists (35.57%-90.90%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>By following standard practice of CT KUB scan, significant radiation dose reduction is achievable without compromising diagnostic details.</p><p><strong>Advances in knowledge: </strong>Standardization of CT KUB examination technique can valuably contribute to reduction in unessential radiation exposure.</p>","PeriodicalId":9306,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Radiology","volume":" ","pages":"1946-1949"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjr/tqae172","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To perform audit of imaging practice in different hospitals to assess their adherence to guidelines on optimizing computerized tomography of kidneys, ureter, and bladder (CT KUB) technique in order to reduce unnecessary scan length. To assess improvement in adherence to guidelines after intervention, following education of the technologists.

Material and methods: There were 12 participant radiology departments in 8 cities of Islamic Republic of Pakistan. Findings of first audit round were presented in respective departmental meetings, and technologists were educated. Second round was performed after 12 weeks. Our target was to achieve 100% compliance to standards. Comparison of adherence to guidelines before and after intervention was done. Total number of axial slices of KUB CT scan, images above upper pole of highest kidney (overscan/unnecessary slices), and percentage of unnecessary images were recorded. To calculate statistical significance of difference, Fischer exact and Chi-square tests were applied.

Results: Percentage of patients with appropriate CT KUB technique according to RCR guidelines was far less in first round (0%-64%). It significantly improved after educating the technologists (35.57%-90.90%).

Conclusion: By following standard practice of CT KUB scan, significant radiation dose reduction is achievable without compromising diagnostic details.

Advances in knowledge: Standardization of CT KUB examination technique can valuably contribute to reduction in unessential radiation exposure.

追求卓越:优化肾绞痛患者 CT KUB 技术的多中心质量改进项目。
目的对不同医院的造影实践进行审计,评估其对优化肾脏、输尿管和膀胱计算机断层扫描(CT KUB)技术指南的遵守情况,以减少不必要的扫描时间。在对技术人员进行教育后,评估干预后遵守指南情况的改善:材料和方法:巴基斯坦伊斯兰共和国 8 个城市的 12 个放射科参与了审核。在各部门会议上介绍了第一轮审核结果,并对技术人员进行了教育。12 周后进行第二轮审核。我们的目标是实现 100% 达标。我们对干预前后遵守指南的情况进行了比较。我们记录了 KUB CT 扫描的轴向切片总数、最高肾脏上极以上的图像(过度扫描/不必要的切片)以及不必要图像的百分比。为计算差异的统计学意义,采用了费舍尔精确检验和卡方检验:结果:在第一轮检查中,根据 RCR 指南采用适当 CT KUB 技术的患者比例较低(0-64%)。对技术人员进行教育后,这一比例明显提高(35.57%- 90.90%):结论:通过遵循 CT KUB 扫描的标准做法,可以在不影响诊断细节的情况下显著降低辐射剂量:知识的进步:CT KUB 检查技术的标准化有助于减少不必要的辐射暴露。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
British Journal of Radiology
British Journal of Radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.80%
发文量
330
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: BJR is the international research journal of the British Institute of Radiology and is the oldest scientific journal in the field of radiology and related sciences. Dating back to 1896, BJR’s history is radiology’s history, and the journal has featured some landmark papers such as the first description of Computed Tomography "Computerized transverse axial tomography" by Godfrey Hounsfield in 1973. A valuable historical resource, the complete BJR archive has been digitized from 1896. Quick Facts: - 2015 Impact Factor – 1.840 - Receipt to first decision – average of 6 weeks - Acceptance to online publication – average of 3 weeks - ISSN: 0007-1285 - eISSN: 1748-880X Open Access option
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信