Tom Plovie, Ruben Schoeters, Thomas Tarnaud, Wout Joseph, Emmeric Tanghe
{"title":"Nonlinearities and timescales in neural models of temporal interference stimulation.","authors":"Tom Plovie, Ruben Schoeters, Thomas Tarnaud, Wout Joseph, Emmeric Tanghe","doi":"10.1002/bem.22522","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In temporal interference (TI) stimulation, neuronal cells react to two interfering sinusoidal electric fields with a slightly different frequency ( <math> <semantics> <mrow> <mrow><msub><mi>f</mi> <mn>1</mn></msub> </mrow> </mrow> <annotation>${f}_{1}$</annotation></semantics> </math> , <math> <semantics> <mrow> <mrow><msub><mi>f</mi> <mn>2</mn></msub> </mrow> </mrow> <annotation>${f}_{2}$</annotation></semantics> </math> in the range of about 1-4 kHz, <math> <semantics> <mrow><mrow><mo>∣</mo> <msub><mi>f</mi> <mn>1</mn></msub> <mo>-</mo> <msub><mi>f</mi> <mn>2</mn></msub> <mo>∣</mo></mrow> </mrow> <annotation>$| {f}_{1}-{f}_{2}| $</annotation></semantics> </math> in the range of about 1-100 Hz). It has been previously observed that for the same input intensity, the neurons do not react to a purely sinusoidal signal at <math> <semantics> <mrow> <mrow><msub><mi>f</mi> <mn>1</mn></msub> </mrow> </mrow> <annotation>${f}_{1}$</annotation></semantics> </math> or <math> <semantics> <mrow> <mrow><msub><mi>f</mi> <mn>2</mn></msub> </mrow> </mrow> <annotation>${f}_{2}$</annotation></semantics> </math> . This study seeks a better understanding of the largely unknown mechanisms underlying TI neuromodulation. To this end, single-compartment models are used to simulate computationally the response of neurons to the sinusoidal and TI waveform. This study compares five different neuron models: Hodgkin-Huxley (HH), Frankenhaeuser-Huxley (FH), along with leaky, exponential, and adaptive-exponential integrate-and-fire (IF). It was found that IF models do not entirely reflect the experimental behavior while the HH and FH model did qualitatively replicate the observed neural responses. Changing the time constants and steady state values of the ion gates in the FH model alters the response to both the sinusoidal and TI signal, possibly reducing the firing threshold of the sinusoidal input below that of the TI input. The results show that in the modified (simplified) model, TI stimulation is not qualitatively impacted by nonlinearities in the current-voltage relation. In contrast, ion channels have a significant impact on the neuronal response. This paper offers insights into neuronal biophysics and computational models of TI stimulation.</p>","PeriodicalId":8956,"journal":{"name":"Bioelectromagnetics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bioelectromagnetics","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/bem.22522","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In temporal interference (TI) stimulation, neuronal cells react to two interfering sinusoidal electric fields with a slightly different frequency ( , in the range of about 1-4 kHz, in the range of about 1-100 Hz). It has been previously observed that for the same input intensity, the neurons do not react to a purely sinusoidal signal at or . This study seeks a better understanding of the largely unknown mechanisms underlying TI neuromodulation. To this end, single-compartment models are used to simulate computationally the response of neurons to the sinusoidal and TI waveform. This study compares five different neuron models: Hodgkin-Huxley (HH), Frankenhaeuser-Huxley (FH), along with leaky, exponential, and adaptive-exponential integrate-and-fire (IF). It was found that IF models do not entirely reflect the experimental behavior while the HH and FH model did qualitatively replicate the observed neural responses. Changing the time constants and steady state values of the ion gates in the FH model alters the response to both the sinusoidal and TI signal, possibly reducing the firing threshold of the sinusoidal input below that of the TI input. The results show that in the modified (simplified) model, TI stimulation is not qualitatively impacted by nonlinearities in the current-voltage relation. In contrast, ion channels have a significant impact on the neuronal response. This paper offers insights into neuronal biophysics and computational models of TI stimulation.
在时间干扰(TI)刺激中,神经元细胞会对两个频率略有不同的干扰正弦电场(f 1 ${f}_{1}$ , f 2 ${f}_{2}$ 在大约 1-4 kHz 的范围内,∣ f 1 - f 2 ∣ $| {f}_{1}-{f}_{2}| $ 在大约 1-100 Hz 的范围内)产生反应。以前曾观察到,在相同的输入强度下,神经元对 f 1 ${f}_{1}$ 或 f 2 ${f}_{2}$ 的纯正弦信号没有反应。本研究旨在更好地了解 TI 神经调控的未知机制。为此,我们使用单室模型来模拟计算神经元对正弦波和 TI 波形的反应。本研究比较了五种不同的神经元模型:霍奇金-赫胥黎(HH)、弗兰肯豪泽尔-赫胥黎(FH),以及渗漏、指数和自适应-指数积分-发射(IF)。研究发现,IF 模型并不能完全反映实验行为,而 HH 和 FH 模型则从本质上复制了观察到的神经反应。改变 FH 模型中离子门的时间常数和稳态值会改变对正弦信号和 TI 信号的反应,可能会使正弦输入的点火阈值低于 TI 输入的点火阈值。结果表明,在修正(简化)模型中,电流-电压关系中的非线性并不会对 TI 刺激产生质的影响。相反,离子通道对神经元的反应有重大影响。本文为神经元生物物理学和 TI 刺激计算模型提供了深入见解。
期刊介绍:
Bioelectromagnetics is published by Wiley-Liss, Inc., for the Bioelectromagnetics Society and is the official journal of the Bioelectromagnetics Society and the European Bioelectromagnetics Association. It is a peer-reviewed, internationally circulated scientific journal that specializes in reporting original data on biological effects and applications of electromagnetic fields that range in frequency from zero hertz (static fields) to the terahertz undulations and visible light. Both experimental and clinical data are of interest to the journal''s readers as are theoretical papers or reviews that offer novel insights into or criticism of contemporary concepts and theories of field-body interactions. The Bioelectromagnetics Society, which sponsors the journal, also welcomes experimental or clinical papers on the domains of sonic and ultrasonic radiation.