Effect of Anatomical Pulmonary Segmentectomy and Lobectomy under Uniportal Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery on Cardiopulmonary Function and Serum Tumor Markers in Patients with Early-Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Yiting Shi, Shuai Xiao
{"title":"Effect of Anatomical Pulmonary Segmentectomy and Lobectomy under Uniportal Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery on Cardiopulmonary Function and Serum Tumor Markers in Patients with Early-Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.","authors":"Yiting Shi, Shuai Xiao","doi":"10.62713/aic.3462","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>In patients with early non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), single-port thoracoscopic anatomical segmentectomy is the primary therapeutic approach. However, the recovery of lung function is slow after operation. Conversely, anatomical segmental pneumonectomy, which excises a smaller volume of lung tissue, may facilitate more rapid functional recovery. This study aims to elucidate the comparative efficacy of these two surgical interventions by analyzing postoperative changes in cardiopulmonary function parameters and serum tumor markers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted on 120 patients with NSCLC between October 2020 and October 2023. The cohort was classified into two groups based on the surgical intervention: the pulmonary segmentectomy group (n = 57), which underwent uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic anatomical pulmonary segmentectomy, and the lobectomy group (n = 63), which received uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic anatomical lobectomy. Surgical parameters and perioperative stress indicators were recorded for both groups of patients. Additionally, cardiopulmonary function indicators and serum biomarker levels of the patients before and 3 months after operation were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The operation time of the segmentectomy group was longer than that of the lobectomy group, the intraoperative blood loss was higher, and the postoperative hospital stay, chest drainage volume and drainage tube indwelling time were shorter (p < 0.001). After treatment, forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), forced vital capacity (FVC), FEV1/FVC and maximal voluntary ventilation (MVV) in the segmentectomy group were higher than those in the lobectomy group (p < 0.001). After treatment, stroke volume (SV) and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in the segmentectomy group were higher than those in the lobectomy group (p < 0.001). There were no significant differences in carbohydrate antigen 50 (CA50), carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and cytokeratin 19 fragment antigen 21-1 (CYFRA21-1) levels between the two groups after treatment (p > 0.05). The levels of Epinephrine (E), Noradrenaline (NE) and Cortisol (Cor) in the segmentectomy group were lower than those in the lobectomy group at one day after operation (p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Compared to uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic anatomical lobectomy, anatomical pulmonary segmentectomy for the treatment of NSCLC is more effective in reducing surgical-induced damage to cardiopulmonary function and can lower perioperative oxidative stress response. However, both surgical approaches exhibit minimal impact on serum tumor marker levels.</p>","PeriodicalId":8210,"journal":{"name":"Annali italiani di chirurgia","volume":"95 4","pages":"593-602"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annali italiani di chirurgia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.62713/aic.3462","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: In patients with early non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), single-port thoracoscopic anatomical segmentectomy is the primary therapeutic approach. However, the recovery of lung function is slow after operation. Conversely, anatomical segmental pneumonectomy, which excises a smaller volume of lung tissue, may facilitate more rapid functional recovery. This study aims to elucidate the comparative efficacy of these two surgical interventions by analyzing postoperative changes in cardiopulmonary function parameters and serum tumor markers.

Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 120 patients with NSCLC between October 2020 and October 2023. The cohort was classified into two groups based on the surgical intervention: the pulmonary segmentectomy group (n = 57), which underwent uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic anatomical pulmonary segmentectomy, and the lobectomy group (n = 63), which received uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic anatomical lobectomy. Surgical parameters and perioperative stress indicators were recorded for both groups of patients. Additionally, cardiopulmonary function indicators and serum biomarker levels of the patients before and 3 months after operation were compared.

Results: The operation time of the segmentectomy group was longer than that of the lobectomy group, the intraoperative blood loss was higher, and the postoperative hospital stay, chest drainage volume and drainage tube indwelling time were shorter (p < 0.001). After treatment, forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), forced vital capacity (FVC), FEV1/FVC and maximal voluntary ventilation (MVV) in the segmentectomy group were higher than those in the lobectomy group (p < 0.001). After treatment, stroke volume (SV) and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in the segmentectomy group were higher than those in the lobectomy group (p < 0.001). There were no significant differences in carbohydrate antigen 50 (CA50), carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and cytokeratin 19 fragment antigen 21-1 (CYFRA21-1) levels between the two groups after treatment (p > 0.05). The levels of Epinephrine (E), Noradrenaline (NE) and Cortisol (Cor) in the segmentectomy group were lower than those in the lobectomy group at one day after operation (p < 0.001).

Conclusions: Compared to uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic anatomical lobectomy, anatomical pulmonary segmentectomy for the treatment of NSCLC is more effective in reducing surgical-induced damage to cardiopulmonary function and can lower perioperative oxidative stress response. However, both surgical approaches exhibit minimal impact on serum tumor marker levels.

单孔视频辅助胸腔镜手术下解剖肺段切除术和肺叶切除术对早期非小细胞肺癌患者心肺功能和血清肿瘤标志物的影响
目的:对于早期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者,单孔胸腔镜解剖分段切除术是主要的治疗方法。然而,术后肺功能恢复缓慢。相反,解剖学分段肺切除术切除的肺组织体积较小,可能有助于更快地恢复功能。本研究旨在通过分析术后心肺功能参数和血清肿瘤标志物的变化,阐明这两种手术治疗方法的疗效比较:对2020年10月至2023年10月期间的120例NSCLC患者进行了回顾性分析。根据手术干预将队列分为两组:肺段切除术组(n = 57)和肺叶切除术组(n = 63),前者接受单孔视频辅助胸腔镜解剖肺段切除术,后者接受单孔视频辅助胸腔镜解剖肺叶切除术。两组患者的手术参数和围手术期应激指标均有记录。此外,还比较了患者术前和术后3个月的心肺功能指标和血清生物标志物水平:结果:分段切除组的手术时间长于肺叶切除组,术中失血量较高,术后住院时间、胸腔引流量和引流管留置时间较短(P < 0.001)。治疗后,分段切除组的一秒用力呼气容积(FEV1)、用力肺活量(FVC)、FEV1/FVC 和最大自主通气量(MVV)均高于肺叶切除组(P < 0.001)。治疗后,分段切除组的每搏容量(SV)和左室射血分数(LVEF)高于肺叶切除组(P < 0.001)。两组治疗后碳水化合物抗原 50(CA50)、癌胚抗原(CEA)和细胞角蛋白 19 片段抗原 21-1(CYFRA21-1)水平无明显差异(P > 0.05)。段切除组术后一天的肾上腺素(E)、去甲肾上腺素(NE)和皮质醇(Cor)水平低于肺叶切除组(P < 0.001):与单孔视频辅助胸腔镜解剖肺叶切除术相比,解剖肺段切除术治疗NSCLC能更有效地减少手术引起的心肺功能损伤,并能降低围手术期的氧化应激反应。不过,这两种手术方法对血清肿瘤标志物水平的影响都很小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
12.50%
发文量
116
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Annali Italiani di Chirurgia is a bimonthly journal and covers all aspects of surgery:elective, emergency and experimental surgery, as well as problems involving technology, teaching, organization and forensic medicine. The articles are published in Italian or English, though English is preferred because it facilitates the international diffusion of the journal (v.Guidelines for Authors and Norme per gli Autori). The articles published are divided into three main sections:editorials, original articles, and case reports and innovations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信