Intra-rater and inter-rater reliability of novel photographic foot print glass box (PFPGB) method in young healthy adults: An observational, cross-sectional study
Abhijeet A. Deshmukh , Lokesh A. Gujar , Tejas S. Savarkar , Maneesha S. Deshpande , Pushpa R. Dhote
{"title":"Intra-rater and inter-rater reliability of novel photographic foot print glass box (PFPGB) method in young healthy adults: An observational, cross-sectional study","authors":"Abhijeet A. Deshmukh , Lokesh A. Gujar , Tejas S. Savarkar , Maneesha S. Deshpande , Pushpa R. Dhote","doi":"10.1016/j.jorep.2024.100462","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The ink footprint method and photographic footprint method are used for measuring foot arches. Chippaux-Smirak index, Staheli index, and Clarke's angle are the parameters to assess foot arches. The aim of this study was to assess Intra-rater and inter-rater reliability of novel photographic foot print glass box (PFPGB) method in 19-to-21 year young healthy adults.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The ink footprint method and photographic footprint method was conducted on 144 young healthy collegiate students of age 19–21 years both males and females. Chippaux-Smirak index, Staheli index, and Clarke's angle was measured with ink footprint method and photographic footprint. The intra-class and inter-class correlation coefficient (ICC) was evaluated for reliability(r).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The photographic glass box method and ink footprint method, showed the intra-rater and inter-rater reliability test values greater than 0.9 and the ICC range varies from 0.92 to 0.98, which is classified as excellent reliability.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Current study showed excellent intra-rater and inter-rater reliability of Photographic footprint glass box method evaluated by Chippaux- Smirak index, Staheli index and Clarke's angle in young healthy adults of 19–21 years. Hence it proves to effective tool for assessing foot arches offering precise measurements.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100818,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Reports","volume":"4 3","pages":"Article 100462"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2773157X24001577/pdfft?md5=53a9be5c1670a3dfee36366fa4bd695a&pid=1-s2.0-S2773157X24001577-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2773157X24001577","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
The ink footprint method and photographic footprint method are used for measuring foot arches. Chippaux-Smirak index, Staheli index, and Clarke's angle are the parameters to assess foot arches. The aim of this study was to assess Intra-rater and inter-rater reliability of novel photographic foot print glass box (PFPGB) method in 19-to-21 year young healthy adults.
Methods
The ink footprint method and photographic footprint method was conducted on 144 young healthy collegiate students of age 19–21 years both males and females. Chippaux-Smirak index, Staheli index, and Clarke's angle was measured with ink footprint method and photographic footprint. The intra-class and inter-class correlation coefficient (ICC) was evaluated for reliability(r).
Results
The photographic glass box method and ink footprint method, showed the intra-rater and inter-rater reliability test values greater than 0.9 and the ICC range varies from 0.92 to 0.98, which is classified as excellent reliability.
Conclusion
Current study showed excellent intra-rater and inter-rater reliability of Photographic footprint glass box method evaluated by Chippaux- Smirak index, Staheli index and Clarke's angle in young healthy adults of 19–21 years. Hence it proves to effective tool for assessing foot arches offering precise measurements.