Adaptation and validation of a suicide-focused Word Sentence Association Paradigm to assess suicide-specific interpretation biases

Abstract

The cognitive model of suicide proposes that biased cognitive processes contribute to suicidal thoughts and behaviors, and initial evidence suggests that attentional bias to suicide-congruent cues may predict suicidal behavior beyond established clinical risk factors. To date, much less work has explored the potential role of interpretation biases in the development and prediction of suicide risk. The present study assessed the psychometric properties, including reliability, concurrent validity, and predictive validity, of a novel adaptation of the Word Sentence Association Paradigm (WSAP) to assess suicide-suicide interpretation biases. In a sample of 239 psychiatric inpatients, including patients with no recent suicidal ideation or lifetime attempts (n = 35), those with recent suicide attempts (n = 29), and those with recent suicidal ideation (n = 174), participants completed the modified WSAP as well as self-reported suicidal ideation and attempts for the subsequent 6 months. Although the WSAP demonstrated good reliability, evidence of concurrent and prospective validity (in terms of self-reported suicidal ideation and attempts) was limited. Specifically, the clinical groups did not differ from one another on any measure of interpretation bias, nor did suicide-specific interpretation endorsements predict concurrent or future suicidal ideation when controlling for dysphoric interpretation bias. However, suicide-specific interpretation biases were uniquely associated with a history of a lifetime suicide attempt. Future work should further clarify the extent and specificity of the relationship between suicide-specific interpretation biases and clinical outcomes.