A census tract-level assessment of social determinants of health, traffic exposure, and asthma exacerbations in New York State's Medicaid Population (2005–2015)

Temilayo Adeyeye , Tabassum Zarina Insaf , Catherine Adler , Victoria Wagner , Anisa Proj , Susan McCauley
{"title":"A census tract-level assessment of social determinants of health, traffic exposure, and asthma exacerbations in New York State's Medicaid Population (2005–2015)","authors":"Temilayo Adeyeye ,&nbsp;Tabassum Zarina Insaf ,&nbsp;Catherine Adler ,&nbsp;Victoria Wagner ,&nbsp;Anisa Proj ,&nbsp;Susan McCauley","doi":"10.1016/j.eehl.2024.04.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study aims to evaluate the association between social determinants, environmental exposure metrics, and the risk of asthma emergency department (ED) visits in the New York State (NYS) Medicaid population using small-area analysis. Traffic densities for each census tract in NYS were calculated using the length of road segments within each tract and total area of the tract to produce a measure of average number of vehicles per square meter per day. Data on social determinants of health including internal and external environments and other demographic factors were obtained from various sources. Poisson regression analyses were conducted to identify significant factors associated with asthma ED visits in Medicaid claim and encounter data for years 2005–2015. High traffic density in NYS excluding New York City (NYC) correlated with increased risk of asthma ED visits (RR 1.69; 95% CI: 1.42, 2.00), mitigated by adjusting for environmental and social determinants (RR 1.00; 95% CI: 0.85, 1.19). Similar trends were observed in NYC only (RR 1.19; 95% CI: 1.00, 1.41), with the adjusted risk remaining elevated (RR 1.14; 95% CI: 0.98, 1.33) albeit not statistically significant. Living in census tracts with high concentrated disadvantage index, high proportions of minorities, and less green space predicted higher asthma ED visits. We mapped predicted rates and model residuals to identify areas of high risk. Our results support previous findings that environmental and social risk factors in poor and urban areas contribute to asthma exacerbations in the NYS Medicaid population, even if they may not necessarily contribute to its development.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":29813,"journal":{"name":"Eco-Environment & Health","volume":"3 3","pages":"Pages 300-307"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772985024000334/pdfft?md5=f9ba009260ea381bf7df2a14a2ec4d21&pid=1-s2.0-S2772985024000334-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eco-Environment & Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772985024000334","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate the association between social determinants, environmental exposure metrics, and the risk of asthma emergency department (ED) visits in the New York State (NYS) Medicaid population using small-area analysis. Traffic densities for each census tract in NYS were calculated using the length of road segments within each tract and total area of the tract to produce a measure of average number of vehicles per square meter per day. Data on social determinants of health including internal and external environments and other demographic factors were obtained from various sources. Poisson regression analyses were conducted to identify significant factors associated with asthma ED visits in Medicaid claim and encounter data for years 2005–2015. High traffic density in NYS excluding New York City (NYC) correlated with increased risk of asthma ED visits (RR 1.69; 95% CI: 1.42, 2.00), mitigated by adjusting for environmental and social determinants (RR 1.00; 95% CI: 0.85, 1.19). Similar trends were observed in NYC only (RR 1.19; 95% CI: 1.00, 1.41), with the adjusted risk remaining elevated (RR 1.14; 95% CI: 0.98, 1.33) albeit not statistically significant. Living in census tracts with high concentrated disadvantage index, high proportions of minorities, and less green space predicted higher asthma ED visits. We mapped predicted rates and model residuals to identify areas of high risk. Our results support previous findings that environmental and social risk factors in poor and urban areas contribute to asthma exacerbations in the NYS Medicaid population, even if they may not necessarily contribute to its development.

Abstract Image

对纽约州医疗补助人口的健康、交通接触和哮喘恶化的社会决定因素进行人口普查区级评估(2005-2015 年)
本研究旨在通过小区域分析,评估纽约州(NYS)医疗补助人群中的社会决定因素、环境暴露指标和哮喘急诊就诊风险之间的关联。纽约州每个人口普查区的交通密度都是通过每个普查区内的路段长度和普查区的总面积计算得出的,以衡量每天每平方米的平均车辆数。有关健康的社会决定因素(包括内部和外部环境及其他人口因素)的数据来自各种渠道。我们进行了泊松回归分析,以确定 2005-2015 年医疗补助申请和就诊数据中与哮喘急诊就诊相关的重要因素。纽约州(不包括纽约市)的高交通密度与哮喘急诊就诊风险的增加相关(RR 1.69;95% CI:1.42, 2.00),调整环境和社会决定因素后,风险有所降低(RR 1.00;95% CI:0.85, 1.19)。仅在纽约市也观察到类似的趋势(RR 1.19;95% CI:1.00,1.41),调整后的风险仍然较高(RR 1.14;95% CI:0.98,1.33),尽管在统计上并不显著。居住在集中劣势指数高、少数民族比例高和绿地较少的人口普查区,哮喘急诊就诊率较高。我们绘制了预测率和模型残差图,以确定高风险地区。我们的研究结果支持了之前的研究结果,即贫困地区和城市地区的环境和社会风险因素会导致纽约州医疗补助人群的哮喘恶化,即使这些因素不一定会导致哮喘的发生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Eco-Environment & Health
Eco-Environment & Health 环境科学与生态学-生态、环境与健康
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
审稿时长
22 days
期刊介绍: Eco-Environment & Health (EEH) is an international and multidisciplinary peer-reviewed journal designed for publications on the frontiers of the ecology, environment and health as well as their related disciplines. EEH focuses on the concept of “One Health” to promote green and sustainable development, dealing with the interactions among ecology, environment and health, and the underlying mechanisms and interventions. Our mission is to be one of the most important flagship journals in the field of environmental health. Scopes EEH covers a variety of research areas, including but not limited to ecology and biodiversity conservation, environmental behaviors and bioprocesses of emerging contaminants, human exposure and health effects, and evaluation, management and regulation of environmental risks. The key topics of EEH include: 1) Ecology and Biodiversity Conservation Biodiversity Ecological restoration Ecological safety Protected area 2) Environmental and Biological Fate of Emerging Contaminants Environmental behaviors Environmental processes Environmental microbiology 3) Human Exposure and Health Effects Environmental toxicology Environmental epidemiology Environmental health risk Food safety 4) Evaluation, Management and Regulation of Environmental Risks Chemical safety Environmental policy Health policy Health economics Environmental remediation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信