Multidimensional prediction of continuous positive airway pressure adherence

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
{"title":"Multidimensional prediction of continuous positive airway pressure adherence","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.sleep.2024.08.018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is the standard treatment for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Unsatisfactory adherence to CPAP is an important clinical issue to resolve. Cluster analysis is a powerful tool to distinguish subgroups in a multidimensional fashion. This study aimed to investigate the use of cluster analysis for predicting CPAP adherence using clinical polysomnographic (PSG) parameters and patient characteristics.</p></div><div><h3>Patients/methods</h3><p>Participants of this multicenter observational study were 1133 patients with OSA who were newly diagnosed and implemented CPAP. Ward's method of cluster analysis was applied to in-laboratory diagnostic PSG parameters and patient characteristics. CPAP adherence was assessed during 90- and 365-day periods after CPAP initiation in each cluster. We adopted the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services criterion for CPAP adherence, i.e., CPAP use ≥4 h per night for 70 % or more of the observation period. Logistic regression analysis was performed to stratify clusters according to CPAP adherence.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Five clusters were identified through cluster analysis. Clustering was significantly associated with CPAP adherence at 90- and 365-day periods after CPAP initiation. Logistic regression revealed that the cluster with features including apnea predominant sleep-disordered breathing, high apnea-hypopnea index, and relatively older age demonstrated the highest CPAP adherence.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Cluster analysis revealed hidden connections using patient characteristics and PSG parameters to successfully identify patients more likely to adhere to CPAP for 90 days and up to 365 days. When prescribing CPAP, it is possible to identify patients with OSA who are more likely to be non-adherent.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":21874,"journal":{"name":"Sleep medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sleep medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1389945724003897","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is the standard treatment for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Unsatisfactory adherence to CPAP is an important clinical issue to resolve. Cluster analysis is a powerful tool to distinguish subgroups in a multidimensional fashion. This study aimed to investigate the use of cluster analysis for predicting CPAP adherence using clinical polysomnographic (PSG) parameters and patient characteristics.

Patients/methods

Participants of this multicenter observational study were 1133 patients with OSA who were newly diagnosed and implemented CPAP. Ward's method of cluster analysis was applied to in-laboratory diagnostic PSG parameters and patient characteristics. CPAP adherence was assessed during 90- and 365-day periods after CPAP initiation in each cluster. We adopted the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services criterion for CPAP adherence, i.e., CPAP use ≥4 h per night for 70 % or more of the observation period. Logistic regression analysis was performed to stratify clusters according to CPAP adherence.

Results

Five clusters were identified through cluster analysis. Clustering was significantly associated with CPAP adherence at 90- and 365-day periods after CPAP initiation. Logistic regression revealed that the cluster with features including apnea predominant sleep-disordered breathing, high apnea-hypopnea index, and relatively older age demonstrated the highest CPAP adherence.

Conclusion

Cluster analysis revealed hidden connections using patient characteristics and PSG parameters to successfully identify patients more likely to adhere to CPAP for 90 days and up to 365 days. When prescribing CPAP, it is possible to identify patients with OSA who are more likely to be non-adherent.

多维度预测持续正压通气的依从性
目的持续气道正压(CPAP)是治疗阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)的标准方法。对 CPAP 的依从性不满意是一个需要解决的重要临床问题。聚类分析是以多维方式区分亚组的有力工具。本研究旨在利用临床多导睡眠图(PSG)参数和患者特征,研究如何使用聚类分析预测 CPAP 的依从性。对实验室诊断 PSG 参数和患者特征采用了 Ward 聚类分析法。在每个群组中,对开始使用 CPAP 后 90 天和 365 天内的 CPAP 依从性进行了评估。我们采用了美国医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心的 CPAP 坚持率标准,即在 70% 或以上的观察期内每晚使用 CPAP ≥4 小时。结果通过聚类分析确定了五个聚类。聚类与开始使用 CPAP 后 90 天和 365 天的 CPAP 依从性明显相关。Logistic 回归显示,具有呼吸暂停为主的睡眠呼吸障碍、高呼吸暂停-低通气指数和年龄相对较大等特征的聚类的 CPAP 依从性最高。在开具 CPAP 处方时,有可能识别出更有可能不坚持使用 CPAP 的 OSA 患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Sleep medicine
Sleep medicine 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
6.20%
发文量
1060
审稿时长
49 days
期刊介绍: Sleep Medicine aims to be a journal no one involved in clinical sleep medicine can do without. A journal primarily focussing on the human aspects of sleep, integrating the various disciplines that are involved in sleep medicine: neurology, clinical neurophysiology, internal medicine (particularly pulmonology and cardiology), psychology, psychiatry, sleep technology, pediatrics, neurosurgery, otorhinolaryngology, and dentistry. The journal publishes the following types of articles: Reviews (also intended as a way to bridge the gap between basic sleep research and clinical relevance); Original Research Articles; Full-length articles; Brief communications; Controversies; Case reports; Letters to the Editor; Journal search and commentaries; Book reviews; Meeting announcements; Listing of relevant organisations plus web sites.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信