Assessment and comparison of the diagnostic value of CT-scan and MRI in acute traumatic spinal compression fractures

Kaveh Jamalipour Soufi , Ghazaleh Jamalipour Soufi , Nastaran Fallahpour , Ali Hekmatnia
{"title":"Assessment and comparison of the diagnostic value of CT-scan and MRI in acute traumatic spinal compression fractures","authors":"Kaveh Jamalipour Soufi ,&nbsp;Ghazaleh Jamalipour Soufi ,&nbsp;Nastaran Fallahpour ,&nbsp;Ali Hekmatnia","doi":"10.1016/j.jorep.2024.100443","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>Vertebral compression fractures (VCFs) frequently occur in trauma patients, with a significant portion affecting younger individuals. Choosing suitable modalities is crucial in these patients to early diagnose of VCF, especially for the prevention of further consequences in VCF patients who are asymptomatic or have mild symptoms. The purpose of this study is to assess and compare the diagnostic value of CT scanning and MRI in detecting spinal compression fractures in acute traumatic patients.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This descriptive analytical study has been performed on traumatic patients with VCFs in hospital based on the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) evidences obtained from April 2020 to February 2021. Computerized tomography (CT), MRI and demographic data of cases were collected from electronic hospital records. Two radiologists reviewed CT-scan and MRI data again.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The results were organized in software SPSS 23 for statistical analysis. Compared to MRI, the sensitivity of CT-scan in the diagnosis of stable VCFs was less than 50 % at all levels; accordingly, the results were 20, 42, and 33 % at cervical, thoracic, and lumbar levels, respectively. This significant difference suggested the necessity of MRI evaluations in such cases. Additionally, the difference in sensitivity of unstable cases was significant; the obtained results were 67, 29, and 52 % at cervical, thoracic, and lumbar levels, respectively). CT-scan illustrated 100 % sensitivity for diagnosing the cases with more than 50 % vertebral body height loss (VBHL). Besides, CT-scan sensitivity in the cases with less than 50 % VBHL was 57 %, 38 %, and 47 % at cervical, thoracic, and lumbar levels, respectively.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>CT-scan for detecting traumatic VCFs and assessing VBHL had significantly lower sensitivity than MRI, especially in the stable cases. Also, potential hazards of harmful radiation could be avoided by applying MRI instead of CT-scan.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100818,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Reports","volume":"4 3","pages":"Article 100443"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2773157X24001383/pdfft?md5=48ce33a2a434195d351daf83f72389a1&pid=1-s2.0-S2773157X24001383-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2773157X24001383","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

Vertebral compression fractures (VCFs) frequently occur in trauma patients, with a significant portion affecting younger individuals. Choosing suitable modalities is crucial in these patients to early diagnose of VCF, especially for the prevention of further consequences in VCF patients who are asymptomatic or have mild symptoms. The purpose of this study is to assess and compare the diagnostic value of CT scanning and MRI in detecting spinal compression fractures in acute traumatic patients.

Methods

This descriptive analytical study has been performed on traumatic patients with VCFs in hospital based on the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) evidences obtained from April 2020 to February 2021. Computerized tomography (CT), MRI and demographic data of cases were collected from electronic hospital records. Two radiologists reviewed CT-scan and MRI data again.

Results

The results were organized in software SPSS 23 for statistical analysis. Compared to MRI, the sensitivity of CT-scan in the diagnosis of stable VCFs was less than 50 % at all levels; accordingly, the results were 20, 42, and 33 % at cervical, thoracic, and lumbar levels, respectively. This significant difference suggested the necessity of MRI evaluations in such cases. Additionally, the difference in sensitivity of unstable cases was significant; the obtained results were 67, 29, and 52 % at cervical, thoracic, and lumbar levels, respectively). CT-scan illustrated 100 % sensitivity for diagnosing the cases with more than 50 % vertebral body height loss (VBHL). Besides, CT-scan sensitivity in the cases with less than 50 % VBHL was 57 %, 38 %, and 47 % at cervical, thoracic, and lumbar levels, respectively.

Conclusion

CT-scan for detecting traumatic VCFs and assessing VBHL had significantly lower sensitivity than MRI, especially in the stable cases. Also, potential hazards of harmful radiation could be avoided by applying MRI instead of CT-scan.

评估和比较 CT 扫描与磁共振成像对急性外伤性脊柱压缩骨折的诊断价值
目的椎体压缩性骨折(VCF)经常发生在外伤患者身上,其中很大一部分是年轻人。对这些患者来说,选择合适的方法对早期诊断椎体压缩性骨折至关重要,尤其是对那些无症状或症状轻微的椎体压缩性骨折患者来说,可有效预防进一步的后果。本研究旨在评估和比较 CT 扫描和 MRI 在检测急性创伤患者脊柱压缩性骨折方面的诊断价值。研究人员从医院电子病历中收集了计算机断层扫描(CT)、磁共振成像(MRI)和病例的人口统计学数据。结果用 SPSS 23 软件进行统计分析。与核磁共振成像相比,CT 扫描诊断稳定型 VCF 的灵敏度在所有层面均低于 50%;因此,在颈椎、胸椎和腰椎层面的灵敏度分别为 20%、42% 和 33%。这一显著差异表明,有必要对此类病例进行磁共振成像评估。此外,不稳定病例的灵敏度也有显著差异;在颈椎、胸椎和腰椎层面的结果分别为 67%、29% 和 52%)。CT 扫描对椎体高度损失超过 50% 的病例的诊断灵敏度为 100%。结论 CT 扫描检测创伤性 VCF 和评估 VBHL 的灵敏度明显低于 MRI,尤其是在病情稳定的病例中。此外,用核磁共振成像代替 CT 扫描可避免潜在的有害辐射危害。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信