Image Quality Evaluation for Brain Soft Tissue in Neuro -endovascular Treatment by Dose-reduction Mode of Dual-axis "Butterfly" Scan.

Hisayuki Hosoo, Yoshiro Ito, Koji Hirata, Mikito Hayakawa, Aiki Marushima, Tomohiko Masumoto, Hiroshi Yamagami, Yuji Matsumaru
{"title":"Image Quality Evaluation for Brain Soft Tissue in Neuro -endovascular Treatment by Dose-reduction Mode of Dual-axis \"Butterfly\" Scan.","authors":"Hisayuki Hosoo, Yoshiro Ito, Koji Hirata, Mikito Hayakawa, Aiki Marushima, Tomohiko Masumoto, Hiroshi Yamagami, Yuji Matsumaru","doi":"10.3174/ajnr.A8472","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>Flat-panel cone-beam CT (CBCT) is essential for detecting hemorrhagic complications during neuroendovascular treatments. Despite its superior image quality and trajectory over conventional CBCT (Circular scan), dual-axis butterfly scan incurs a slightly higher radiation dose relative to conventional CBCT. This study evaluates the image quality in dose-reduction mode to uncover the appropriate radiation dose for the butterfly scan.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We prospectively included patients who scheduled neuroendovascular treatment and performed conventional CBCT and dose-reduction mode of the butterfly scan. Two reduced radiation dose modes were utilized for the butterfly scan: medium-dose butterfly scan (70% of the original dose, 45 mGy) or low-dose butterfly scan (50% of the original dose, 30 mGy). The enrolled patients were assigned alternately to receive either the medium-or low-dose butterfly scan. We evaluated and compared artifacts, contrast, and discrimination of the corticomedullary junction between conventional CBCT and one of the dose-reduction modes of the butterfly scan, with a 5-point scale scoring system.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty patients were enrolled in each of the medium-and low-dose groups, totaling 40 patients. Compared to conventional CBCT, the medium-dose butterfly group exhibited reduced artifacts, enhanced contrast, and discriminated corticomedullary junction (except in the occipital lobe). While the low-dose butterfly group exhibited markedly reduced artifacts and improved contrast (except in the occipital lobe), a significant improvement in corticomedullary junction discrimination was unobserved.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Even with dose reduction, the specialized trajectory of the butterfly scan enables artifact reduction, contrast improvement, and enhanced corticomedullary junction discrimination. However, the impact of the reduced dose was more noticeable, particularly in the occipital region where susceptibility to bone interference resulted in decreased contrast and compromised corticomedullary junction discrimination.</p><p><strong>Abbreviations: </strong>AVM=arteriovenous malformation, CBCT=cone-beam CT, CAS=carotid artery stenting, CTDI=CT dose index, DAVF=dural arteriovenous fistula, FD=flow diverter,PTAS=percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stenting.</p>","PeriodicalId":93863,"journal":{"name":"AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A8472","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and purpose: Flat-panel cone-beam CT (CBCT) is essential for detecting hemorrhagic complications during neuroendovascular treatments. Despite its superior image quality and trajectory over conventional CBCT (Circular scan), dual-axis butterfly scan incurs a slightly higher radiation dose relative to conventional CBCT. This study evaluates the image quality in dose-reduction mode to uncover the appropriate radiation dose for the butterfly scan.

Materials and methods: We prospectively included patients who scheduled neuroendovascular treatment and performed conventional CBCT and dose-reduction mode of the butterfly scan. Two reduced radiation dose modes were utilized for the butterfly scan: medium-dose butterfly scan (70% of the original dose, 45 mGy) or low-dose butterfly scan (50% of the original dose, 30 mGy). The enrolled patients were assigned alternately to receive either the medium-or low-dose butterfly scan. We evaluated and compared artifacts, contrast, and discrimination of the corticomedullary junction between conventional CBCT and one of the dose-reduction modes of the butterfly scan, with a 5-point scale scoring system.

Results: Twenty patients were enrolled in each of the medium-and low-dose groups, totaling 40 patients. Compared to conventional CBCT, the medium-dose butterfly group exhibited reduced artifacts, enhanced contrast, and discriminated corticomedullary junction (except in the occipital lobe). While the low-dose butterfly group exhibited markedly reduced artifacts and improved contrast (except in the occipital lobe), a significant improvement in corticomedullary junction discrimination was unobserved.

Conclusions: Even with dose reduction, the specialized trajectory of the butterfly scan enables artifact reduction, contrast improvement, and enhanced corticomedullary junction discrimination. However, the impact of the reduced dose was more noticeable, particularly in the occipital region where susceptibility to bone interference resulted in decreased contrast and compromised corticomedullary junction discrimination.

Abbreviations: AVM=arteriovenous malformation, CBCT=cone-beam CT, CAS=carotid artery stenting, CTDI=CT dose index, DAVF=dural arteriovenous fistula, FD=flow diverter,PTAS=percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stenting.

双轴 "蝴蝶 "扫描的剂量降低模式对神经血管内治疗中脑部软组织的图像质量评估
背景和目的:平板锥束 CT(CBCT)对于检测神经内血管治疗过程中的出血并发症至关重要。尽管双轴蝶形扫描的图像质量和轨迹优于传统 CBCT(环形扫描),但其辐射剂量略高于传统 CBCT。本研究评估了剂量降低模式下的图像质量,以确定蝶形扫描的适当辐射剂量:我们前瞻性地纳入了计划接受神经血管治疗的患者,并对其进行了常规 CBCT 和剂量减低模式的蝶形扫描。蝶形扫描采用了两种辐射剂量降低模式:中剂量蝶形扫描(原始剂量的 70%,45 mGy)或低剂量蝶形扫描(原始剂量的 50%,30 mGy)。入组患者交替接受中剂量或低剂量蝶形扫描。我们采用 5 点评分法评估并比较了传统 CBCT 和一种剂量降低模式的蝶形扫描之间的伪影、对比度和皮质髓质交界处的辨别力:中剂量组和低剂量组各有 20 名患者,共 40 名患者。与传统的 CBCT 相比,中剂量蝶形扫描组减少了伪影,增强了对比度,并能分辨皮质髓质交界处(枕叶除外)。低剂量蝶形组的伪影明显减少,对比度有所提高(枕叶除外),但皮质髓质交界处的辨别能力没有明显改善:结论:即使减少了剂量,蝶形扫描的特殊轨迹也能减少伪影、提高对比度并增强皮质髓质交界处的辨别力。然而,减少剂量的影响更为明显,尤其是在枕骨区,该区域易受骨干扰,导致对比度下降,影响了皮质髓质交界处的辨别能力:缩写:AVM=动静脉畸形,CBCT=锥形束 CT,CAS=颈动脉支架植入术,CTDI=CT 剂量指数,DAVF=硬脑膜动静脉瘘,FD=血流分流器,PTAS=经皮腔内血管成形术和支架植入术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信