Remote Teleproctoring with the TEGUS System for Mechanical Thrombectomy in a Non-Comprehensive Stroke Center: Initial Preliminary Data On Clinical Experience.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Maria Lourdes Diaz, Tomás Carmona, Manuel Requena, Carlos Piñana, David Hernández, Francesco Diana, Marta De Dios, Jordi Farrero, Marc Ribo, Arturo Fredes Araya, Laura Ludovica Gramegna, Francisco Purroy, Leandro Fernandez, Jordi Villalba, Manuel Quintana, Alejandro Tomasello
{"title":"Remote Teleproctoring with the TEGUS System for Mechanical Thrombectomy in a Non-Comprehensive Stroke Center: Initial Preliminary Data On Clinical Experience.","authors":"Maria Lourdes Diaz, Tomás Carmona, Manuel Requena, Carlos Piñana, David Hernández, Francesco Diana, Marta De Dios, Jordi Farrero, Marc Ribo, Arturo Fredes Araya, Laura Ludovica Gramegna, Francisco Purroy, Leandro Fernandez, Jordi Villalba, Manuel Quintana, Alejandro Tomasello","doi":"10.1007/s00062-024-01440-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Mechanical thrombectomy (MT) is typically performed by experienced neurointerventional radiologists. However, logistical and geographic limitations often hinder access to rapid MT. This study reports the first clinical experience using TEGUS teleproctoring to support MT conducted by general interventional radiologists (IR) at non-comprehensive stroke centers, compared to on-site proctoring outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Arnau de Vilanova Hospital in Spain used to transfer stroke patients requiring MT to a comprehensive Stroke Center 160 km away. To overcome COVID-19 mobility restrictions, the Tegus Teleproctoring System was installed. Before teleproctoring, the general interventional radiologist underwent six months of neurointerventional training at a primary stroke center. From April 2021 to May 2023, general IR conducted MT either with on-site proctor supervision or teleproctoring support. We aim to compare clinical outcome of patients receiving MT according to proctoring method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During the study, 49 MTs were performed: 15 with TEGUS teleproctoring and 34 with on-site proctoring. Both groups had similar baseline characteristics, except for NIHSS scores (Tegus 9 [IQR 6-20] vs 18 [IQR 12-22], p = 0.034). No significant differences were found in door-to-revascularization time (82 ± 28.2 vs 84 ± 26.4) min, p = (0.895). The final mTICI distribution and 90-day mRS scores were comparable after adjusting by stroke severity. There were no reports of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage in either group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study shows the feasibility of Tegus remote teleproctoring during emergent cases of MT in a remote hospital. It could improve the learning curve of interventional radiologists with limited experience in MT, and lower the territorial inequity associated to MT.</p>","PeriodicalId":49298,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Neuroradiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Neuroradiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00062-024-01440-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Mechanical thrombectomy (MT) is typically performed by experienced neurointerventional radiologists. However, logistical and geographic limitations often hinder access to rapid MT. This study reports the first clinical experience using TEGUS teleproctoring to support MT conducted by general interventional radiologists (IR) at non-comprehensive stroke centers, compared to on-site proctoring outcomes.

Methods: The Arnau de Vilanova Hospital in Spain used to transfer stroke patients requiring MT to a comprehensive Stroke Center 160 km away. To overcome COVID-19 mobility restrictions, the Tegus Teleproctoring System was installed. Before teleproctoring, the general interventional radiologist underwent six months of neurointerventional training at a primary stroke center. From April 2021 to May 2023, general IR conducted MT either with on-site proctor supervision or teleproctoring support. We aim to compare clinical outcome of patients receiving MT according to proctoring method.

Results: During the study, 49 MTs were performed: 15 with TEGUS teleproctoring and 34 with on-site proctoring. Both groups had similar baseline characteristics, except for NIHSS scores (Tegus 9 [IQR 6-20] vs 18 [IQR 12-22], p = 0.034). No significant differences were found in door-to-revascularization time (82 ± 28.2 vs 84 ± 26.4) min, p = (0.895). The final mTICI distribution and 90-day mRS scores were comparable after adjusting by stroke severity. There were no reports of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage in either group.

Conclusion: This study shows the feasibility of Tegus remote teleproctoring during emergent cases of MT in a remote hospital. It could improve the learning curve of interventional radiologists with limited experience in MT, and lower the territorial inequity associated to MT.

Abstract Image

在非综合卒中中心使用 TEGUS 系统远程指导机械血栓切除术:临床经验的初步初步数据。
目的:机械血栓切除术(MT)通常由经验丰富的神经介入放射科医生实施。然而,后勤和地理位置的限制往往阻碍了快速进行机械取栓术。本研究报告了首次使用 TEGUS 远程监查支持非综合卒中中心普通介入放射医师(IR)进行机械取栓术的临床经验,并与现场监查结果进行了比较:西班牙 Arnau de Vilanova 医院曾将需要 MT 的中风患者转送到 160 公里外的综合中风中心。为了克服 COVID-19 的行动限制,医院安装了 Tegus 远程监考系统。在远程监查之前,普通介入放射科医生要在初级卒中中心接受六个月的神经介入培训。从 2021 年 4 月到 2023 年 5 月,普通介入放射医师在现场监查员监督或远程监查支持下进行 MT。我们旨在比较不同监考方式下接受MT患者的临床疗效:研究期间共进行了 49 次 MT:结果:研究期间共进行了 49 次 MT:15 次采用 TEGUS 远程监考,34 次采用现场监考。除 NIHSS 评分(Tegus 9 [IQR 6-20] vs 18 [IQR 12-22],P = 0.034)外,两组患者的基线特征相似。门到血管再通时间(82±28.2 vs 84±26.4)分钟,p = (0.895),无明显差异。根据中风严重程度进行调整后,最终的 mTICI 分布和 90 天 mRS 评分具有可比性。两组患者均无症状性颅内出血报告:本研究表明,在偏远医院的 MT 急诊病例中,Tegus 远程远程指导是可行的。结论:这项研究表明,在偏远地区医院的急诊病例中,Tegus 远程远程指导是可行的,它可以改善经验有限的介入放射科医生在 MT 方面的学习曲线,并降低与 MT 相关的地域不平等。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Neuroradiology
Clinical Neuroradiology CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
3.60%
发文量
106
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Neuroradiology provides current information, original contributions, and reviews in the field of neuroradiology. An interdisciplinary approach is accomplished by diagnostic and therapeutic contributions related to associated subjects. The international coverage and relevance of the journal is underlined by its being the official journal of the German, Swiss, and Austrian Societies of Neuroradiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信