Madison R Glass, Elisa A Waxman, Satoshi Yamashita, Michael Lafferty, Alvaro A Beltran, Tala Farah, Niyanta K Patel, Rubal Singla, Nana Matoba, Sara Ahmed, Mary Srivastava, Emma Drake, Liam T Davis, Meghana Yeturi, Kexin Sun, Michael I Love, Kazue Hashimoto-Torii, Deborah L French, Jason L Stein
{"title":"Cross-site reproducibility of human cortical organoids reveals consistent cell type composition and architecture.","authors":"Madison R Glass, Elisa A Waxman, Satoshi Yamashita, Michael Lafferty, Alvaro A Beltran, Tala Farah, Niyanta K Patel, Rubal Singla, Nana Matoba, Sara Ahmed, Mary Srivastava, Emma Drake, Liam T Davis, Meghana Yeturi, Kexin Sun, Michael I Love, Kazue Hashimoto-Torii, Deborah L French, Jason L Stein","doi":"10.1016/j.stemcr.2024.07.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>While guided human cortical organoid (hCO) protocols reproducibly generate cortical cell types at one site, variability in hCO phenotypes across sites using a harmonized protocol has not yet been evaluated. To determine the cross-site reproducibility of hCO differentiation, three independent research groups assayed hCOs in multiple differentiation replicates from one induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC) line using a harmonized miniaturized spinning bioreactor protocol across 3 months. hCOs were mostly cortical progenitor and neuronal cell types in reproducible proportions that were consistently organized in cortical wall-like buds. Cross-site differences were detected in hCO size and expression of metabolism and cellular stress genes. Variability in hCO phenotypes correlated with stem cell gene expression prior to differentiation and technical factors associated with seeding, suggesting iPSC quality and treatment are important for differentiation outcomes. Cross-site reproducibility of hCO cell type proportions and organization encourages future prospective meta-analytic studies modeling neurodevelopmental disorders in hCOs.</p>","PeriodicalId":21885,"journal":{"name":"Stem Cell Reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11411306/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stem Cell Reports","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stemcr.2024.07.008","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CELL & TISSUE ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
While guided human cortical organoid (hCO) protocols reproducibly generate cortical cell types at one site, variability in hCO phenotypes across sites using a harmonized protocol has not yet been evaluated. To determine the cross-site reproducibility of hCO differentiation, three independent research groups assayed hCOs in multiple differentiation replicates from one induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC) line using a harmonized miniaturized spinning bioreactor protocol across 3 months. hCOs were mostly cortical progenitor and neuronal cell types in reproducible proportions that were consistently organized in cortical wall-like buds. Cross-site differences were detected in hCO size and expression of metabolism and cellular stress genes. Variability in hCO phenotypes correlated with stem cell gene expression prior to differentiation and technical factors associated with seeding, suggesting iPSC quality and treatment are important for differentiation outcomes. Cross-site reproducibility of hCO cell type proportions and organization encourages future prospective meta-analytic studies modeling neurodevelopmental disorders in hCOs.
期刊介绍:
Stem Cell Reports publishes high-quality, peer-reviewed research presenting conceptual or practical advances across the breadth of stem cell research and its applications to medicine. Our particular focus on shorter, single-point articles, timely publication, strong editorial decision-making and scientific input by leaders in the field and a "scoop protection" mechanism are reasons to submit your best papers.