Investigating the impact of OCT imaging of the crystalline lens on the accuracy and precision of cataract assessment.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-23 DOI:10.1111/opo.13383
Niamh Burke, Pádraig J Mulholland, Pearse A Keane, Julie-Anne Little
{"title":"Investigating the impact of OCT imaging of the crystalline lens on the accuracy and precision of cataract assessment.","authors":"Niamh Burke, Pádraig J Mulholland, Pearse A Keane, Julie-Anne Little","doi":"10.1111/opo.13383","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To determine if supplementing standard clinical assessments with Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) imaging of the crystalline lens improves the accuracy and precision of lens opacity assessment and associated clinical management decisions by optometrists.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fifty optometrists registered in the UK or Éire undertook a clinical vignette study where participants graded lens opacities and made associated clinical management decisions based on the image(s)/information displayed. Three forms of vignettes were presented: (1) Slit-lamp (SL) images of the lens, (2) SL and OCT images and (3) SL, OCT and visual function measures. Vignettes were constructed using anonymised data from 50 patients with varying cataract severity, each vignette being presented twice in a randomised order (total vignette presentations = 300). The accuracy of opacity and management decisions were evaluated using descriptive statistics and non-parametric Bland-Altman analysis where assessments from experienced clinicians were the reference. The precision of assessments was examined for each vignette form using non-parametric Bland-Altman analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All (n = 50) participants completed the study, with 36 working in primary eyecare (primary eyecare) settings and 14 in hospital eyecare services (HES). Agreement was highest where vignettes contained all clinical data (i.e., SL, OCT and visual function data-grading: 51.0%, management: 50.5%), and systematically reduced with decreasing vignette content (p < 0.001). A larger number of vignettes containing imaging and visual function measures exhibited below reference (i.e., less conservative) grading compared with vignettes containing imaging data alone (all p < 0.05). HES-based optometrists were more likely to grade lens opacities lower than clinicians working in primary eyecare (p < 0.001). Good measurement precision was evident for all vignettes, with a mean bias close to zero and limits of agreement below one grading step for all conditions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The addition of anterior segment OCT to SL images improved the accuracy of lens opacity grading. Structural assessment alone yielded more conservative decision making, which reversed once visual functional data was available.</p>","PeriodicalId":19522,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/opo.13383","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To determine if supplementing standard clinical assessments with Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) imaging of the crystalline lens improves the accuracy and precision of lens opacity assessment and associated clinical management decisions by optometrists.

Methods: Fifty optometrists registered in the UK or Éire undertook a clinical vignette study where participants graded lens opacities and made associated clinical management decisions based on the image(s)/information displayed. Three forms of vignettes were presented: (1) Slit-lamp (SL) images of the lens, (2) SL and OCT images and (3) SL, OCT and visual function measures. Vignettes were constructed using anonymised data from 50 patients with varying cataract severity, each vignette being presented twice in a randomised order (total vignette presentations = 300). The accuracy of opacity and management decisions were evaluated using descriptive statistics and non-parametric Bland-Altman analysis where assessments from experienced clinicians were the reference. The precision of assessments was examined for each vignette form using non-parametric Bland-Altman analysis.

Results: All (n = 50) participants completed the study, with 36 working in primary eyecare (primary eyecare) settings and 14 in hospital eyecare services (HES). Agreement was highest where vignettes contained all clinical data (i.e., SL, OCT and visual function data-grading: 51.0%, management: 50.5%), and systematically reduced with decreasing vignette content (p < 0.001). A larger number of vignettes containing imaging and visual function measures exhibited below reference (i.e., less conservative) grading compared with vignettes containing imaging data alone (all p < 0.05). HES-based optometrists were more likely to grade lens opacities lower than clinicians working in primary eyecare (p < 0.001). Good measurement precision was evident for all vignettes, with a mean bias close to zero and limits of agreement below one grading step for all conditions.

Conclusions: The addition of anterior segment OCT to SL images improved the accuracy of lens opacity grading. Structural assessment alone yielded more conservative decision making, which reversed once visual functional data was available.

研究晶状体 OCT 成像对白内障评估准确性和精确性的影响。
目的:确定用晶体透镜光学相干断层成像(OCT)对标准临床评估进行补充是否能提高验光师对晶状体混浊评估和相关临床管理决策的准确性和精确性:50 名在英国或爱尔兰注册的验光师进行了一项临床小故事研究,参与者根据显示的图像/信息对晶状体混浊进行分级并做出相关临床管理决定。小故事以三种形式呈现:(1) 晶状体的裂隙灯(SL)图像;(2) SL 和 OCT 图像;(3) SL、OCT 和视觉功能测量。小插图是利用 50 名白内障严重程度不同的患者的匿名数据制作的,每个小插图以随机顺序展示两次(小插图展示总数 = 300)。采用描述性统计和非参数布兰-阿尔特曼分析法对不透明和管理决策的准确性进行评估,并以经验丰富的临床医生的评估结果为参考。使用非参数布兰-阿尔特曼分析法检查了每种小插图形式的评估精确度:所有参与者(n = 50)均完成了研究,其中 36 人在基层眼科医疗机构工作,14 人在医院眼科医疗服务机构工作。在包含所有临床数据的小节中,一致性最高(即,SL、OCT 和视觉功能数据--分级:51.0%,管理:50.5%),随着小节内容的减少,一致性系统性降低(P 结论:在小节中加入前节 OCT,可以提高视觉功能的分级和管理:将眼前节 OCT 添加到 SL 图像中可提高晶状体混浊分级的准确性。仅对结构进行评估会产生更保守的决策,而一旦有了视觉功能数据,情况就会发生逆转。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
13.80%
发文量
135
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Ophthalmic & Physiological Optics, first published in 1925, is a leading international interdisciplinary journal that addresses basic and applied questions pertinent to contemporary research in vision science and optometry. OPO publishes original research papers, technical notes, reviews and letters and will interest researchers, educators and clinicians concerned with the development, use and restoration of vision.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信