Comparison of the efficacy and safety of a 730-nm picosecond titanium sapphire laser and a 1064-nm picosecond neodymium yttrium aluminum garnet laser for the treatment of acquired bilateral nevus of Ota-like macules: A split-face, evaluator-blinded, randomized, and controlled pilot trial.

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 DERMATOLOGY
Wanxin Chen, Zhongshuai Wang, Zhenzhen Li, Chen Yuan, Xiaofeng Zhang, Li Li, Yan Yan, Baoxi Wang
{"title":"Comparison of the efficacy and safety of a 730-nm picosecond titanium sapphire laser and a 1064-nm picosecond neodymium yttrium aluminum garnet laser for the treatment of acquired bilateral nevus of Ota-like macules: A split-face, evaluator-blinded, randomized, and controlled pilot trial.","authors":"Wanxin Chen, Zhongshuai Wang, Zhenzhen Li, Chen Yuan, Xiaofeng Zhang, Li Li, Yan Yan, Baoxi Wang","doi":"10.1111/jocd.16511","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The picosecond neodymium yttrium aluminum garnet laser (PNYL) has been successfully used in treating acquired bilateral nevus of Ota-like macules (ABNOM). The 730-nm picosecond titanium sapphire laser (PTSL) is an emerging tool for pigmentary disorders. However, no studies have compared two different wavelengths of picosecond laser for the treatment of ABNOM.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To compare the efficacy and safety of the 730-nm PTSL with the 1064-nm PNYL in the treatment of ABNOM.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fifteen participants with ABNOM were randomized to undergo a single session of either the 730-nm PTSL on one side of the face and 1064-nm PNYL on the other side. Efficacy and safety assessments were performed by blinded visual evaluations at baseline, 12 weeks, and 24 weeks posttreatment. Participants' satisfaction and adverse effects were recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared to baseline, The 730-nm PTSL-treated side showed better improvement than that of the 1064-nm PNYL-treated side at 24 weeks posttreatment (1.67 ± 1.047 vs. 0.87 ± 0.640, p = 0.027). There were no significant differences in pain sensation and participants' satisfaction between the two laser treatments.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The 730-nm PTSL is more effective than the 1064-nm PNYL in the treatment of ABNOM.</p>","PeriodicalId":15546,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jocd.16511","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The picosecond neodymium yttrium aluminum garnet laser (PNYL) has been successfully used in treating acquired bilateral nevus of Ota-like macules (ABNOM). The 730-nm picosecond titanium sapphire laser (PTSL) is an emerging tool for pigmentary disorders. However, no studies have compared two different wavelengths of picosecond laser for the treatment of ABNOM.

Aims: To compare the efficacy and safety of the 730-nm PTSL with the 1064-nm PNYL in the treatment of ABNOM.

Methods: Fifteen participants with ABNOM were randomized to undergo a single session of either the 730-nm PTSL on one side of the face and 1064-nm PNYL on the other side. Efficacy and safety assessments were performed by blinded visual evaluations at baseline, 12 weeks, and 24 weeks posttreatment. Participants' satisfaction and adverse effects were recorded.

Results: Compared to baseline, The 730-nm PTSL-treated side showed better improvement than that of the 1064-nm PNYL-treated side at 24 weeks posttreatment (1.67 ± 1.047 vs. 0.87 ± 0.640, p = 0.027). There were no significant differences in pain sensation and participants' satisfaction between the two laser treatments.

Conclusions: The 730-nm PTSL is more effective than the 1064-nm PNYL in the treatment of ABNOM.

比较 730 纳米皮秒钛蓝宝石激光和 1064 纳米皮秒钕钇铝石榴石激光治疗获得性双侧太田痣样黄斑的有效性和安全性:分面、评价者盲法、随机对照试验。
背景:皮秒钕钇铝石榴石激光(PNYL)已成功用于治疗获得性双侧太田痣样黄斑(ABNOM)。730 纳米皮秒钛蓝宝石激光器(PTSL)是治疗色素性疾病的新兴工具。目的:比较 730 波长皮秒激光和 1064 波长皮秒激光治疗 ABNOM 的有效性和安全性:方法:15 位 ABNOM 患者被随机分配到一侧面部接受 730 纳米 PTSL 治疗,另一侧接受 1064 纳米 PNYL 治疗。疗效和安全性评估分别在基线、治疗后 12 周和 24 周通过盲法视觉评估进行。参与者的满意度和不良反应也被记录在案:与基线相比,730 nm PTSL 治疗侧在治疗后 24 周的改善效果优于 1064 nm PNYL 治疗侧(1.67 ± 1.047 vs. 0.87 ± 0.640,p = 0.027)。两种激光疗法在疼痛感觉和参与者满意度方面没有明显差异:结论:在治疗 ABNOM 方面,730 波长 PTSL 比 1064 波长 PNYL 更有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
13.00%
发文量
818
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology publishes high quality, peer-reviewed articles on all aspects of cosmetic dermatology with the aim to foster the highest standards of patient care in cosmetic dermatology. Published quarterly, the Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology facilitates continuing professional development and provides a forum for the exchange of scientific research and innovative techniques. The scope of coverage includes, but will not be limited to: healthy skin; skin maintenance; ageing skin; photodamage and photoprotection; rejuvenation; biochemistry, endocrinology and neuroimmunology of healthy skin; imaging; skin measurement; quality of life; skin types; sensitive skin; rosacea and acne; sebum; sweat; fat; phlebology; hair conservation, restoration and removal; nails and nail surgery; pigment; psychological and medicolegal issues; retinoids; cosmetic chemistry; dermopharmacy; cosmeceuticals; toiletries; striae; cellulite; cosmetic dermatological surgery; blepharoplasty; liposuction; surgical complications; botulinum; fillers, peels and dermabrasion; local and tumescent anaesthesia; electrosurgery; lasers, including laser physics, laser research and safety, vascular lasers, pigment lasers, hair removal lasers, tattoo removal lasers, resurfacing lasers, dermal remodelling lasers and laser complications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信