Preoperative prophylactic insertion of intraaortic balloon pumps in critically ill patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery: a meta-analysis of RCTS.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Yunnan Hu, Mumu Fan, Peirong Zhang, Rui Li
{"title":"Preoperative prophylactic insertion of intraaortic balloon pumps in critically ill patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery: a meta-analysis of RCTS.","authors":"Yunnan Hu, Mumu Fan, Peirong Zhang, Rui Li","doi":"10.1186/s13019-024-02961-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) technique plays a crucial role in providing circulatory support for patients experiencing hemodynamic instability. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness and safety of preoperative prophylactic IABP insertion in patients undergoing acute critical coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases, covering the period from January 1995 to September 2022.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The incidence of renal insufficiency, mechanical ventilation exceeding 24 h, and bleeding events in the IABP group did not exhibit significant differences compared to the control group (relative risk [RR] = 0.85, P = 0.26; RR = 0.81, P = 0.08; RR = 0.95, P = 0.87). However, the hospital mortality rate was significantly lower in the IABP group than in the control group (RR = 0.54, P = 0.0007), and the length of ICU stay was shorter in the IABP group (mean difference [MD] = -1.12, P < 0.000001). The IABP group also exhibited a lower incidence of low cardiac output syndrome (LCOS%) compared to the control group (RR = 0.61, P < 0.0001), and a lower incidence of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE%) (RR = 0.70, P = 0.001). No significant publication bias was observed in the funnel plot analysis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Preoperative prophylactic insertion of IABP is currently considered beneficial in improving outcomes for critically ill patients undergoing CABG. This technique reduces hospital mortality, shortens ICU stays, and lowers the incidence of LCOS% and MACCE%.</p>","PeriodicalId":15201,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11342580/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13019-024-02961-y","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) technique plays a crucial role in providing circulatory support for patients experiencing hemodynamic instability. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness and safety of preoperative prophylactic IABP insertion in patients undergoing acute critical coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).

Methods: A comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases, covering the period from January 1995 to September 2022.

Results: The incidence of renal insufficiency, mechanical ventilation exceeding 24 h, and bleeding events in the IABP group did not exhibit significant differences compared to the control group (relative risk [RR] = 0.85, P = 0.26; RR = 0.81, P = 0.08; RR = 0.95, P = 0.87). However, the hospital mortality rate was significantly lower in the IABP group than in the control group (RR = 0.54, P = 0.0007), and the length of ICU stay was shorter in the IABP group (mean difference [MD] = -1.12, P < 0.000001). The IABP group also exhibited a lower incidence of low cardiac output syndrome (LCOS%) compared to the control group (RR = 0.61, P < 0.0001), and a lower incidence of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE%) (RR = 0.70, P = 0.001). No significant publication bias was observed in the funnel plot analysis.

Conclusion: Preoperative prophylactic insertion of IABP is currently considered beneficial in improving outcomes for critically ill patients undergoing CABG. This technique reduces hospital mortality, shortens ICU stays, and lowers the incidence of LCOS% and MACCE%.

接受冠状动脉搭桥手术的重症患者术前预防性插入主动脉内球囊泵:RCTS 的荟萃分析。
背景:主动脉内球囊反搏泵(IABP)技术在为血流动力学不稳定的患者提供循环支持方面发挥着至关重要的作用。本研究旨在评估急性危重冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)患者术前预防性插入 IABP 的有效性和安全性:方法:在PubMed、Cochrane Library和Embase数据库中进行了全面检索,时间跨度为1995年1月至2022年9月:与对照组相比,IABP 组肾功能不全、机械通气超过 24 小时和出血事件的发生率无显著差异(相对风险 [RR] = 0.85,P = 0.26;RR = 0.81,P = 0.08;RR = 0.95,P = 0.87)。然而,IABP 组的住院死亡率明显低于对照组(RR = 0.54,P = 0.0007),IABP 组的重症监护室住院时间更短(平均差 [MD] = -1.12,P 结论:IABP 组的住院时间更短(平均差 [MD] = -1.12,P 结论:IABP 组的住院时间更短(平均差 [MD] = -1.12,P 结论:IABP 组的住院时间更短):目前认为,术前预防性插入 IABP 有利于改善接受 CABG 的重症患者的预后。该技术可降低住院死亡率,缩短重症监护室的住院时间,降低 LCOS% 和 MACCE% 的发生率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery
Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
6.20%
发文量
286
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery is an open access journal that encompasses all aspects of research in the field of Cardiology, and Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery. The journal publishes original scientific research documenting clinical and experimental advances in cardiac, vascular and thoracic surgery, and related fields. Topics of interest include surgical techniques, survival rates, surgical complications and their outcomes; along with basic sciences, pediatric conditions, transplantations and clinical trials. Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery is of interest to cardiothoracic and vascular surgeons, cardiothoracic anaesthesiologists, cardiologists, chest physicians, and allied health professionals.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信