Comparing South Dakota Pharmacist Perspectives of Pharmacy Services in Rural versus Urban settings

IF 1.8 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
{"title":"Comparing South Dakota Pharmacist Perspectives of Pharmacy Services in Rural versus Urban settings","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.rcsop.2024.100490","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Access to healthcare services is a major barrier to residents of the rural state of South Dakota. As a highly accessible member of the healthcare team, outpatient pharmacists can play a key role in a patient's healthcare journey. There is a need to identify the unique barriers and facilitators pharmacists in both rural and urban areas face to maximize the impact of their role.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The objective of this work was to compare perceptions of rural and urban pharmacists regarding the facilitators and barriers to providing patient care in South Dakota.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This qualitative project highlights results from interviews and focus group sessions with a convenience sample of South Dakota pharmacists. Participants were recruited using a referral word-of-mouth system, contracts with healthcare market research agencies, newspaper advertisements, and posters displayed in public locations in South Dakota. Practice location was characterized as rural or urban based on United States Department of Agriculture definitions. Findings from interviews and focus group sessions were coded and analyzed using content analysis by two student researchers.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Participants included 12 rural-practicing and 21 urban-practicing pharmacists in South Dakota. In both rural and urban areas, key barriers included communication with providers (50% rural; 50% urban), lack of electronic health record access (25% rural; 14% urban), not enough staff (22% rural; 20% urban), and patient misunderstanding the scope of pharmacy (22% rural; 40% urban). Barriers specific to rural areas included time to provide services (22%), having smaller facilities (27%) and provider hesitation regarding collaborative practice agreements (29%). There were no urban-specific barriers. Facilitators specific to urban areas included frequent communication with patients (6.1%) and good quality support staff (9.1%). There were no rural-specific facilitators.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Next steps include increasing awareness of pharmacy-based patient care services, researching further to identify the extent to which facilitators and barriers influence the ability to initiate and sustain pharmacy services in rural and urban areas, and providing support to pharmacies to overcome barriers and leverage facilitators.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":73003,"journal":{"name":"Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667276624000878/pdfft?md5=f2a28af8a8f8fc3c1610e0bc7a336b88&pid=1-s2.0-S2667276624000878-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667276624000878","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Access to healthcare services is a major barrier to residents of the rural state of South Dakota. As a highly accessible member of the healthcare team, outpatient pharmacists can play a key role in a patient's healthcare journey. There is a need to identify the unique barriers and facilitators pharmacists in both rural and urban areas face to maximize the impact of their role.

Objective

The objective of this work was to compare perceptions of rural and urban pharmacists regarding the facilitators and barriers to providing patient care in South Dakota.

Methods

This qualitative project highlights results from interviews and focus group sessions with a convenience sample of South Dakota pharmacists. Participants were recruited using a referral word-of-mouth system, contracts with healthcare market research agencies, newspaper advertisements, and posters displayed in public locations in South Dakota. Practice location was characterized as rural or urban based on United States Department of Agriculture definitions. Findings from interviews and focus group sessions were coded and analyzed using content analysis by two student researchers.

Results

Participants included 12 rural-practicing and 21 urban-practicing pharmacists in South Dakota. In both rural and urban areas, key barriers included communication with providers (50% rural; 50% urban), lack of electronic health record access (25% rural; 14% urban), not enough staff (22% rural; 20% urban), and patient misunderstanding the scope of pharmacy (22% rural; 40% urban). Barriers specific to rural areas included time to provide services (22%), having smaller facilities (27%) and provider hesitation regarding collaborative practice agreements (29%). There were no urban-specific barriers. Facilitators specific to urban areas included frequent communication with patients (6.1%) and good quality support staff (9.1%). There were no rural-specific facilitators.

Conclusions

Next steps include increasing awareness of pharmacy-based patient care services, researching further to identify the extent to which facilitators and barriers influence the ability to initiate and sustain pharmacy services in rural and urban areas, and providing support to pharmacies to overcome barriers and leverage facilitators.

比较南达科他州药剂师对农村和城市药房服务的看法
背景对于南达科他州的农村居民来说,获得医疗保健服务是一个主要障碍。门诊药剂师作为医疗团队中极易接触到的一员,可以在患者的医疗过程中发挥关键作用。这项工作的目的是比较农村和城市药剂师对在南达科他州为患者提供医疗保健服务的促进因素和障碍的看法。方法该定性项目突出强调了对南达科他州药剂师进行方便抽样的访谈和焦点小组会议的结果。我们通过口碑转介系统、与医疗保健市场调研机构签订合同、报纸广告以及在南达科他州公共场所张贴海报等方式招募参与者。根据美国农业部的定义,实践地点被划分为农村或城市。两名学生研究员通过内容分析法对访谈和焦点小组会议的结果进行了编码和分析。在农村和城市地区,主要障碍包括与医疗服务提供者的沟通(50% 的农村地区;50% 的城市地区)、缺乏电子健康记录访问(25% 的农村地区;14% 的城市地区)、人手不足(22% 的农村地区;20% 的城市地区)以及患者对药学范围的误解(22% 的农村地区;40% 的城市地区)。农村地区特有的障碍包括提供服务的时间(22%)、设施规模较小(27%)以及提供者对合作实践协议犹豫不决(29%)。没有城市特有的障碍。城市地区特有的促进因素包括与患者的频繁沟通(6.1%)和高素质的辅助人员(9.1%)。结论接下来的步骤包括:提高对基于药房的患者护理服务的认识;进一步研究以确定促进因素和障碍在多大程度上影响了在农村和城市地区启动和维持药房服务的能力;以及为药房提供支持以克服障碍和利用促进因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
103 days
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信