Land competition and its impact on decarbonized energy systems: A case study for Germany

IF 7.9 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS
Marlon Schlemminger , Clemens Lohr , Florian Peterssen , Dennis Bredemeier , Raphael Niepelt , Astrid Bensmann , Richard Hanke-Rauschenbach , Michael H. Breitner , Rolf Brendel
{"title":"Land competition and its impact on decarbonized energy systems: A case study for Germany","authors":"Marlon Schlemminger ,&nbsp;Clemens Lohr ,&nbsp;Florian Peterssen ,&nbsp;Dennis Bredemeier ,&nbsp;Raphael Niepelt ,&nbsp;Astrid Bensmann ,&nbsp;Richard Hanke-Rauschenbach ,&nbsp;Michael H. Breitner ,&nbsp;Rolf Brendel","doi":"10.1016/j.esr.2024.101502","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In densely populated countries, land competition is a key challenge in light of a growing population and the land-intensive decarbonization of energy supply. We apply an energy system model using linear optimization to Germany as an example for a densely populated and industrialized nation with a high energy demand to show how land competition affects the economics of land-intensive renewable energies. Bioenergy crops are currently cultivated on 6.5% of Germany’s land area. We find that allocating only 6% of the total land to the future energy system, which is even less than the current allocation to bioenergy crops, allows for a system that is close to the cost-minimum that we calculate when not restricting the land area. This 6% of the land area is divided into 4% for photovoltaics (PV), 2% for onshore wind and 0% for bioenergy crops. This would save 15<!--> <!-->billion<!--> <!-->€/a (15.1%) relative to the system that matches current political targets for utility-scale PV. For areas exceeding this 6%, we find that the most cost-efficient utilization comes from bioenergy crops, but they only add value to the energy system if there is plenty of land available. The value of land to the energy system is at least twice as high for 0% remaining emissions when compared to the case of 10% remaining green house gas emissions, although both scenarios are separated by less than five years according to current German law. Both our findings underline that considering the value of land as early as possible is necessary when developing state policies that shall lead to cost-efficient renewable energy systems.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":11546,"journal":{"name":"Energy Strategy Reviews","volume":"55 ","pages":"Article 101502"},"PeriodicalIF":7.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211467X24002116/pdfft?md5=91232f7480bf63a3f5f3226dea53b8d6&pid=1-s2.0-S2211467X24002116-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Strategy Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211467X24002116","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In densely populated countries, land competition is a key challenge in light of a growing population and the land-intensive decarbonization of energy supply. We apply an energy system model using linear optimization to Germany as an example for a densely populated and industrialized nation with a high energy demand to show how land competition affects the economics of land-intensive renewable energies. Bioenergy crops are currently cultivated on 6.5% of Germany’s land area. We find that allocating only 6% of the total land to the future energy system, which is even less than the current allocation to bioenergy crops, allows for a system that is close to the cost-minimum that we calculate when not restricting the land area. This 6% of the land area is divided into 4% for photovoltaics (PV), 2% for onshore wind and 0% for bioenergy crops. This would save 15 billion €/a (15.1%) relative to the system that matches current political targets for utility-scale PV. For areas exceeding this 6%, we find that the most cost-efficient utilization comes from bioenergy crops, but they only add value to the energy system if there is plenty of land available. The value of land to the energy system is at least twice as high for 0% remaining emissions when compared to the case of 10% remaining green house gas emissions, although both scenarios are separated by less than five years according to current German law. Both our findings underline that considering the value of land as early as possible is necessary when developing state policies that shall lead to cost-efficient renewable energy systems.

土地竞争及其对去碳化能源系统的影响:德国案例研究
在人口稠密的国家,由于人口增长和能源供应的土地密集型去碳化,土地竞争是一项关键挑战。我们采用线性优化的能源系统模型,以人口稠密、能源需求高的工业化国家德国为例,说明土地竞争如何影响土地密集型可再生能源的经济性。目前,生物能源作物的种植面积占德国土地面积的 6.5%。我们发现,未来的能源系统只需分配总土地面积的 6%(比目前生物能源作物的分配面积还要少),就能使系统接近我们在不限制土地面积的情况下计算出的最低成本。这 6% 的土地面积中,4% 用于光伏发电,2% 用于陆上风电,0% 用于生物能源作物。相对于符合当前公用事业规模光伏发电政治目标的系统,这将节省 150 亿欧元/年(15.1%)。对于超过 6% 的地区,我们发现生物能源作物的利用最具成本效益,但只有在有大量可用土地的情况下,生物能源作物才能为能源系统增值。在剩余排放量为 0% 的情况下,土地对能源系统的价值至少是剩余温室气体排放量为 10% 情况下的两倍,尽管根据德国现行法律,这两种情况相差不到五年。我们的这两项研究结果都强调,在制定国家政策时,有必要尽早考虑土地的价值,以建立具有成本效益的可再生能源系统。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Energy Strategy Reviews
Energy Strategy Reviews Energy-Energy (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
12.80
自引率
4.90%
发文量
167
审稿时长
40 weeks
期刊介绍: Energy Strategy Reviews is a gold open access journal that provides authoritative content on strategic decision-making and vision-sharing related to society''s energy needs. Energy Strategy Reviews publishes: • Analyses • Methodologies • Case Studies • Reviews And by invitation: • Report Reviews • Viewpoints
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信