Pervasive tissue-, genetic background-, and allele-specific gene expression effects in Drosophila melanogaster.

IF 4 2区 生物学 Q1 GENETICS & HEREDITY
PLoS Genetics Pub Date : 2024-08-23 eCollection Date: 2024-08-01 DOI:10.1371/journal.pgen.1011257
Amanda Glaser-Schmitt, Marion Lemoine, Martin Kaltenpoth, John Parsch
{"title":"Pervasive tissue-, genetic background-, and allele-specific gene expression effects in Drosophila melanogaster.","authors":"Amanda Glaser-Schmitt, Marion Lemoine, Martin Kaltenpoth, John Parsch","doi":"10.1371/journal.pgen.1011257","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The pervasiveness of gene expression variation and its contribution to phenotypic variation and evolution is well known. This gene expression variation is context dependent, with differences in regulatory architecture often associated with intrinsic and environmental factors, and is modulated by regulatory elements that can act in cis (linked) or in trans (unlinked) relative to the genes they affect. So far, little is known about how this genetic variation affects the evolution of regulatory architecture among closely related tissues during population divergence. To address this question, we analyzed gene expression in the midgut, hindgut, and Malpighian tubule as well as microbiome composition in the two gut tissues in four Drosophila melanogaster strains and their F1 hybrids from two divergent populations: one from the derived, European range and one from the ancestral, African range. In both the transcriptome and microbiome data, we detected extensive tissue- and genetic background-specific effects, including effects of genetic background on overall tissue specificity. Tissue-specific effects were typically stronger than genetic background-specific effects, although the two gut tissues were not more similar to each other than to the Malpighian tubules. An examination of allele specific expression revealed that, while both cis and trans effects were more tissue-specific in genes expressed differentially between populations than genes with conserved expression, trans effects were more tissue-specific than cis effects. Despite there being highly variable regulatory architecture, this observation was robust across tissues and genetic backgrounds, suggesting that the expression of trans variation can be spatially fine-tuned as well as or better than cis variation during population divergence and yielding new insights into cis and trans regulatory evolution.</p>","PeriodicalId":49007,"journal":{"name":"PLoS Genetics","volume":"20 8","pages":"e1011257"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11376557/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLoS Genetics","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1011257","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The pervasiveness of gene expression variation and its contribution to phenotypic variation and evolution is well known. This gene expression variation is context dependent, with differences in regulatory architecture often associated with intrinsic and environmental factors, and is modulated by regulatory elements that can act in cis (linked) or in trans (unlinked) relative to the genes they affect. So far, little is known about how this genetic variation affects the evolution of regulatory architecture among closely related tissues during population divergence. To address this question, we analyzed gene expression in the midgut, hindgut, and Malpighian tubule as well as microbiome composition in the two gut tissues in four Drosophila melanogaster strains and their F1 hybrids from two divergent populations: one from the derived, European range and one from the ancestral, African range. In both the transcriptome and microbiome data, we detected extensive tissue- and genetic background-specific effects, including effects of genetic background on overall tissue specificity. Tissue-specific effects were typically stronger than genetic background-specific effects, although the two gut tissues were not more similar to each other than to the Malpighian tubules. An examination of allele specific expression revealed that, while both cis and trans effects were more tissue-specific in genes expressed differentially between populations than genes with conserved expression, trans effects were more tissue-specific than cis effects. Despite there being highly variable regulatory architecture, this observation was robust across tissues and genetic backgrounds, suggesting that the expression of trans variation can be spatially fine-tuned as well as or better than cis variation during population divergence and yielding new insights into cis and trans regulatory evolution.

黑腹果蝇中普遍存在的组织、遗传背景和等位基因特异性基因表达效应。
基因表达变异的普遍性及其对表型变异和进化的贡献众所周知。这种基因表达变异与环境有关,调控结构的差异通常与内在因素和环境因素有关,并受到调控元件的调节,这些元件可以顺式(连接)或反式(非连接)相对于它们影响的基因起作用。迄今为止,人们对这种遗传变异在种群分化过程中如何影响近缘组织间调控结构的演变知之甚少。为了解决这个问题,我们分析了四个黑腹果蝇品系及其 F1 代杂交种在中肠、后肠和 Malpighian 小管中的基因表达,以及这两个肠道组织中微生物组的组成,它们来自两个不同的种群:一个来自衍生的欧洲种群,一个来自祖先的非洲种群。在转录组和微生物组数据中,我们发现了广泛的组织和遗传背景特异性效应,包括遗传背景对总体组织特异性的影响。组织特异性效应通常强于遗传背景特异性效应,尽管两种肠道组织之间的相似性并不比与马氏管之间的相似性高。对等位基因特异性表达的研究表明,虽然顺式效应和反式效应对不同种群间表达不同的基因的组织特异性要强于表达保守的基因,但反式效应的组织特异性要强于顺式效应。尽管存在高度可变的调控结构,但这一观察结果在不同组织和遗传背景之间都是稳健的,这表明在种群分化过程中,反式变异的表达在空间上的微调效果与顺式变异一样好,甚至更好,从而为顺式和反式调控进化提供了新的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
PLoS Genetics
PLoS Genetics GENETICS & HEREDITY-
自引率
2.20%
发文量
438
期刊介绍: PLOS Genetics is run by an international Editorial Board, headed by the Editors-in-Chief, Greg Barsh (HudsonAlpha Institute of Biotechnology, and Stanford University School of Medicine) and Greg Copenhaver (The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill). Articles published in PLOS Genetics are archived in PubMed Central and cited in PubMed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信