Enhancing grid hosting capacity with coordinated non-firm connections in industrial energy communities

IF 5.4 Q2 ENERGY & FUELS
Sigurd Bjarghov , Sverre Stefanussen Foslie , Magnus Askeland , Rubi Rana , Henning Taxt
{"title":"Enhancing grid hosting capacity with coordinated non-firm connections in industrial energy communities","authors":"Sigurd Bjarghov ,&nbsp;Sverre Stefanussen Foslie ,&nbsp;Magnus Askeland ,&nbsp;Rubi Rana ,&nbsp;Henning Taxt","doi":"10.1016/j.segy.2024.100154","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>A significant increase in grid connection requests from industrial customers has lead to long connection queues. Combined with long lead times on grid construction, the result is significant socioeconomic losses due to lack of grid capacity. Distribution system operators (DSO) have therefore introduced non-firm connections as an alternative, where the new grid customer may connect on the condition that the DSO retains the right to disconnect the grid customer if necessary. An option to potential disconnection is for customers to leverage flexibility to stay below an agreed capacity level. Unfortunately, many existing grid customers possess flexibility potential but lack incentives to utilise it. To address this, we propose a “coordinated non-firm connection”, where the new grid customer forms an energy community with existing grid customers to coordinate flexibility and capacity utilisation. To demonstrate technical feasibility and incentive compatibility, we formulate a complementarity model. Applying this model to a case study involving three industrial grid customers, we showcase both technical potential and incentive compatibility. Results illustrate how energy community members engage in capacity trading within a local market, ensuring adherence to grid limitations. The game theory-based model confirms sufficient economic benefit for all members to participate.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34738,"journal":{"name":"Smart Energy","volume":"15 ","pages":"Article 100154"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666955224000248/pdfft?md5=4a1b81ab158a95020a1a43bca4e3db91&pid=1-s2.0-S2666955224000248-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Smart Energy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666955224000248","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A significant increase in grid connection requests from industrial customers has lead to long connection queues. Combined with long lead times on grid construction, the result is significant socioeconomic losses due to lack of grid capacity. Distribution system operators (DSO) have therefore introduced non-firm connections as an alternative, where the new grid customer may connect on the condition that the DSO retains the right to disconnect the grid customer if necessary. An option to potential disconnection is for customers to leverage flexibility to stay below an agreed capacity level. Unfortunately, many existing grid customers possess flexibility potential but lack incentives to utilise it. To address this, we propose a “coordinated non-firm connection”, where the new grid customer forms an energy community with existing grid customers to coordinate flexibility and capacity utilisation. To demonstrate technical feasibility and incentive compatibility, we formulate a complementarity model. Applying this model to a case study involving three industrial grid customers, we showcase both technical potential and incentive compatibility. Results illustrate how energy community members engage in capacity trading within a local market, ensuring adherence to grid limitations. The game theory-based model confirms sufficient economic benefit for all members to participate.

Abstract Image

通过协调工业能源社区的非确认连接,提高电网托管能力
工业客户的并网申请大幅增加,导致并网排队时间过长。再加上电网建设周期长,结果是由于电网容量不足而造成重大社会经济损失。因此,配电系统运营商(DSO)引入了非确认连接作为替代方案,即新的电网客户可以连接电网,但条件是配电系统运营商保留在必要时断开电网客户连接的权利。除了可能的断开连接外,客户还可以利用灵活性,使其保持在商定的容量水平以下。遗憾的是,许多现有电网客户拥有灵活性潜力,但缺乏利用灵活性的动力。为了解决这个问题,我们提出了 "协调非确认连接",即新电网客户与现有电网客户组成一个能源社区,以协调灵活性和容量利用。为了证明技术可行性和激励相容性,我们建立了一个互补模型。将该模型应用于涉及三个工业电网客户的案例研究中,我们展示了技术潜力和激励相容性。研究结果说明了能源社区成员如何在本地市场进行容量交易,确保遵守电网限制。基于博弈论的模型证实了所有成员参与其中都能获得足够的经济利益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Smart Energy
Smart Energy Engineering-Mechanical Engineering
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
审稿时长
73 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信