Sex differences in delay times in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: A cohort study

{"title":"Sex differences in delay times in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: A cohort study","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.medcle.2024.02.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The present study analyzes a cohort of consecutive patients with ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction (STEMI), evaluating the ischemia–reperfusion times from the perspective of gender differences (females versus males), with a long-term follow-up.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Single-center analytical cohort study of patients with STEMI in a tertiary hospital, between January 2015 and December 2020.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 2668 patients were included, 2002 (75%) men and 666 (25%) women. The time elapsed from the onset of symptoms to the opening of the artery was 197<!--> <!-->min (IQR 140–300) vs 220<!--> <!-->min (IQR 152–340), <em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.004 in men and women respectively. A delay in health care significantly impacts the occurrence of cardiovascular adverse events at follow-up, HR 1.34 [95%CI 1.06–1.70]; <em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.015.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Women took longer to go to health care services and had a longer delay both in the diagnosis of STEMI and in coronary reperfusion. It is imperative to emphasize the necessity of educating women about the recognition of ischemic heart disease symptoms, empowering them to raise early alarms and seek timely medical attention.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74154,"journal":{"name":"Medicina clinica (English ed.)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicina clinica (English ed.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2387020624003164","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The present study analyzes a cohort of consecutive patients with ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction (STEMI), evaluating the ischemia–reperfusion times from the perspective of gender differences (females versus males), with a long-term follow-up.

Methods

Single-center analytical cohort study of patients with STEMI in a tertiary hospital, between January 2015 and December 2020.

Results

A total of 2668 patients were included, 2002 (75%) men and 666 (25%) women. The time elapsed from the onset of symptoms to the opening of the artery was 197 min (IQR 140–300) vs 220 min (IQR 152–340), p = 0.004 in men and women respectively. A delay in health care significantly impacts the occurrence of cardiovascular adverse events at follow-up, HR 1.34 [95%CI 1.06–1.70]; p = 0.015.

Conclusions

Women took longer to go to health care services and had a longer delay both in the diagnosis of STEMI and in coronary reperfusion. It is imperative to emphasize the necessity of educating women about the recognition of ischemic heart disease symptoms, empowering them to raise early alarms and seek timely medical attention.

ST 段抬高型心肌梗死延迟时间的性别差异:一项队列研究
背景本研究分析了ST段抬高型急性心肌梗死(STEMI)连续患者队列,从性别差异(女性与男性)的角度评估了缺血再灌注时间,并进行了长期随访。结果共纳入2668例患者,其中男性2002例(75%),女性666例(25%)。男性和女性从症状出现到动脉开通的时间分别为197分钟(IQR 140-300)和220分钟(IQR 152-340),P = 0.004。结论 女性就医时间更长,STEMI 诊断和冠状动脉再灌注的延迟时间也更长。必须强调的是,有必要对妇女进行缺血性心脏病症状识别方面的教育,使她们有能力发出早期警报并及时就医。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信